Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.12.004
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Review Article

Digital block with or without the addition of epinephrine in the anesthetic solution

Bloqueios em dedos de mãos com epinefrina incluída ou não nas soluções anestésicas

Almiro dos Reis Júnior; Denise Quinto

Downloads: 0
Views: 1043

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Review of various techniques for digital blocks with local anesthetic, with or without epinephrine. CONTENTS: Description of various procedures and comparison of results reported in the literature, mainly on latency and quality of anesthesia, details on vasoconstrictor effect of epinephrine, intraoperative bleeding, necessity of tourniquet use, duration of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, blood flow and digital SpO2 behavior, local and systemic complications, and also approaches and drugs to be used in certain situations of ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: The advantages of adding epinephrine to the anesthetic solution are minor when compared to the risks of the procedure, and it seems dangerous to use a vasoconstrictor in the fingers, unless the safety of the technique and the possibility of discarding the tourniquet are definitely proven.

Keywords

Anesthesia, regional, Local anesthetics, cocaine, lidocaine, bupivacaine, ropivacaine, Surgery, fingers, Ischemia, epinephrine

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Revisão das diversas técnicas para bloqueios em dedos de mãos, com anestésico local associado ou não à epinefrina. CONTEÚDO: São descritos os procedimentos usados e comparados os resultados obtidos na literatura, principalmente em relação a: latência e qualidade da anestesia, detalhes sobre o efeito vasoconstritor da epinefrina, sangramento intraoperatório, necessidade ou não do uso de torniquete, duração da anestesia e da analgesia pós-operatórias, comportamento do fluxo arterial e da SpO2 digitais, complicações locais e sistêmicas e, ainda, condutas e medicamentos a serem usados em determinadas situações de isquemia. CONCLUSÕES: As vantagens da inclusão de epinefrina na solução anestésica são de pouca importância quando comparadas aos riscos do procedimento e parece perigoso usar o vasoconstritor em dedos de mão, a não ser que fiquem definitivamente comprovadas a inocuidade da técnica e a possibilidade do descarte do torniquete.

Palavras-chave

Anestesia, regional, Anestésicos locais, cocaína, lidocaína, bupivacaína, ropivacaína, Cirurgia, dedos de mãos, Isquemia, epinefrina

References

Bridenbaugh LD. The upper extremity: somatic blockade. Neural blockade in clinical anesthesia and management of pain. 1988:412-5.

Fisher L, Gordon M. Anesthesia for hand surgery. Green's operative hand surgery, vol. 2011:32-4.

Scarff CE, Scarff CW. Digital nerve blocks: more gain with less pain. Australas J Dermatol.. 2007;48:60-1.

Reis A Jr. Dessangramento e garroteamento de membros com finalidade cirúrgica. 1998:11-57.

Chiu DTW. Transthecal digital block: flexor tendon sheath used for anesthetic infusion. J Hand Surg.. 1990;15:471-3.

Hill RG Jr, Patterson JW, Parker JC. Comparison of trans- thecal digital block and traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. Ann Emerg Med.. 1995;25:604-7.

Williams JG, Lalonde DH. Randomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2000;118:1195-200.

Cummings AJ, Tisol W, Meyer LE. Modified transthecal digital block versus traditional digital block for anesthesia of the finger. J Hand Surg.. 2004;29:44-8.

Sonohata A, Asami K, Ogawa S. Single injection digi- tal block: is a transthecal injection necessary?. J Hand Surg.. 2009;34:94-8.

Sonohata M, Nagamine S, Maeda K. Subcuta-neous single injection digital block with epinephrine. 2012.

Reis A Jr. Anestesia regional intravenosa. 1996:203-7.

Reis JA. Carta ao editor: Anestesia regional intravenosa digital. Rev Bras Anestesiol.. 1990;40:77.

Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Miller JH. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth?. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2001;107:393-7.

Krunic AL, Wang LC, Soltani K. Digital anesthesia with epinephrine: an old myth revisited. J Am Acad Dermatol.. 2004;51:755-9.

Lalonde DH, Bell M, Benoit P. A multicenter prospective study of 3,110 consecutive cases of elective epinephrine use in the fingers and hand: the Dalhousie project clinical phase. J Hand Surg (Am).. 2005;30:1061-7.

Chowdhry S, Seidenstricker L, Cooney DS. Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth. A retrospective review of 1,111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2010;126:2031-4.

Mann T, Hammert WC. Epinephrine and hand surgery. J Hand Surg.. 2012;37:1254-6.

Denkler K. A comprehensive review of epinephrine in the finger: to do or not to do. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2001;108:114-24.

Sylaidis P, Logan A. Digital blocks with adrenaline. An old dogma refuted. J Hand Surg.. 1998;23:17-9.

Denkler KA. Epinephrine in the digits. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2011;128:598.

Fizcharles-Bowe C, Denkler KA, Lalonde DH. Hand. . 2007;2:5-11.

Thomson CJ, Lalonde DH, Denkler KA. A critical look at the evidence for and against elective epinephrine use in the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2007;119:260-6.

Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Miller JH. Epinephrine in digital blocks: revisited. Ann Plast Surg.. 1998;41:410-4.

Andrades PR, Olguin FA. Digital blocks with or without epinephrine. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2003;111:1769-70.

Nodwell T, Lalonde DH. How long does it take phentolamine to reserve adrenaline-induced vasoconstriction in the finger and hand? A prospective randomized blinded study: the Dalhouse project experimental phase. Can J Plast Surg.. 2003;11:187-90.

Denkler K. Dupuytren's faciectomies in 60 consecutive digits using lidocaine with epinephrine and no tourniquete. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2005;115:802-10.

Waterbrook AL, German CA, Southall JC. Is epinephrine harm- ful when used with anesthetics for digital nerve blockers?. Ann Emerg Med.. 2007;50:472-5.

Sönmez A, Yaman M, Esroy B. Digital blocks with and without adrenaline: a randomized-controlled study of capillary blood parameters. J Hand Surg.. 2008;33:515-8.

Lalonde DH, Lalond JF. Discussion: do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Par II. A retrospective review of 1111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2010;126:2035-6.

Muck AE, Bebarta VS, Borys DJ. Six years of epinephrine digital injections: absence of significant local or systemic effects. Ann Emerg Med.. 2010;56:270-5.

Altinyazar HC, Ozdemir H, Koca R. Epinephrine in digital block: color Doppler flow imaging. Dermatol Surg.. 2004;30:508-11.

McGovern SJ. Treatment of accidental injection of adrenaline from an auto-injector-device. J Accid Emerg Med.. 1997;14:379-80.

Lee G, Thomas PC. Accidental digital injection of adrenaline from an autoinjector device. J Accid Emerg Med.. 1998;15:287.

Barkhordarian AR, Wakelin SH, Paes TRF. Accidental digital injection of adrenaline from an autoinjector device. Br J Der- matol.. 2000;43:359.

Kairalla E. Epinephrine-induced digital ischemia relieved by phentolamine. Plast Reconstr Surg.. 2001;108:1831-2.

Velissariou I, Cotrell S, Berry K. Management of adrenaline (epinephrine) induced digital ischemia in children after acci- dental injection from an EpiPen. Emerg Med J.. 2004;21:387-8.

Schintler MV, Arbab E, Aberer W. Accidental perforat- ing bone injury using the EpiPen autoinjection device. Allergy.. 2005;60:259-60.

Sicherer SH, Simons FE. Self-injectable epinephrine for first-aid management of anaphylaxis. Pediatrics.. 2007;119:638-46.

Mathez C, Favrat B, Staeger P. Management options for acciden- tal injection of epinephrine from an autoinjector: a case report. J Med Case Reports.. 2009;3:7268.

Greenberg MI, Riviello RJ. Local effects after inadvertent digital injection with an epinephrine auto- injector. Clin Toxicol (Phila).. 2010;48:1179-80.

5dcd9b500e8825be5bbf58f1 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections