Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942011000100007
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Avaliação pré-anestésica e redução dos custos do preparo pré-operatório

Preanesthesia evaluation and reduction of preoperative care costs

Márcia Rodrigues Neder Issa; Núbia Faria Campos Isoni; Alessandra Marinho Soares; Magda Lourenço Fernandes

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942011000100007 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.61, n1, p.65-71, 2011
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 1
Views: 1085

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A avaliação pré-anestésica (APA) é fundamental no preparo do paciente cirúrgico. Entre suas muitas vantagens, destaca-se a redução dos custos com o preparo pré-operatório. Embora estudos prévios tenham constatado esse benefício, não é certo que ele se aplique adequadamente em nosso meio. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os custos do preparo pré-operatório realizado pelo cirurgião com os custos estimados a partir da APA. Paralelamente, comparou-se a classificação do estado físico da American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) determinada pelo anestesiologista ou por outros especialistas. MÉTODO: Duzentos pacientes candidatos a procedimentos cirúrgicos ou diagnósticos eletivos, cujo preparo pré-operatório foi orientado pelo cirurgião, foram submetidos à APA após internação hospitalar. O anestesiologista determinou os exames complementares ou as consultas especializadas e necessárias a cada paciente. Foram comparados o número e os custos dos exames ou consultas indicados pelo anestesiologista com aqueles realizados no preparo pré-operatório. Comparou-se também a classificação da ASA determinada pelo anestesiologista ou pelo médico que realizou a consulta especializada. RESULTADOS: Dos 1.075 exames complementares realizados, 55,8% não estavam indicados, o que equivaleu a uma fração de 50,8% do custo total com exames. O anestesiologista considerou que 37 pacientes (18,5%) não precisariam realizar exames. O custo do preparo orientado pelo cirurgião foi 25,11% maior do que o custo estimado a partir da avaliação pré-anestésica, sendo essa diferença estatisticamente significante (p < 0,01). Houve discordância na classificação da ASA em 9,3% dos pacientes avaliados pelo especialista. CONCLUSÕES: O preparo pré-operatório baseado na avaliação pré-anestésica criteriosa pode resultar em significativa redução dos custos quando comparado ao preparo orientado pelo cirurgião. Observou-se boa concordância na determinação do escore da ASA.

Palavras-chave

AVALIAÇÃO, EXAMES COMPLEMENTARES

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preanesthesia evaluation (PAE) is fundamental in the preparation of a surgical patient. Among its advantages is the reduction of preoperative care costs. Although prior studies had observed this benefit, it is not clear whether it can be taken into consideration among us. The objective of the present study was to compare the costs of preoperative care performed by the surgeon with estimated costs based on PAE. In parallel, we compared the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification determined by the anesthesiologist with that estimated by other specialists. METHODS: Two hundred patients scheduled for elective surgery or diagnostic procedures whose preoperative care was made by the surgeon underwent PAE after hospital admission. The anesthesiologist determined which ancillary exams or referrals necessary for each patient. The number and cost of ancillary exams or referrals requested by the anesthesiologist were compared with those of the preoperative preparation. The ASA classification according to the anesthesiologist was also compared to that of the physician in charge of the consultation. RESULTS: Out of 1,075 ancillary exams performed, 55.8% were not indicated, which corresponded to 50.8% of the total cost of exams. The anesthesiologist considered that 37 patients (18.5%) did not require exams. The cost of surgeon-oriented preoperative care was higher than that based on the preanesthesia evaluation and this difference in costs was statistically significant (p < 0.01). In 9.3% of the patients discordance in ASA classification according to the specialist was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative care based on judicious preanesthesia evaluation can result in significant reduction in costs when compared to that oriented by the surgeon. Good concordance in ASA classification was observed.

Keywords

Anesthesia, Preoperative Care, Laboratory Techniques and Procedures, Costs and Cost Analysis

Referencias

Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:485-496.

Klopfenstein CE, Forster A, Van Gessel E. Anesthetic assessment in an outpatient consultation clinic reduces preoperative anxiety. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:511-515.

Mendes FF, Mathias LAST, Duval Neto GF. Impacto da implantação de clínica de avaliação pré-operatória em indicadores de desempenho. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2005;45:175-187.

Barnes PK, Emerson PA, Hajnal S. Influence of an anaesthetist on nurse-led, computer-based, pre-operative assessment. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:576-580.

Ferrando A, Ivaldi C, Buttiglieri A. Guidelines for preoperative assessment: impact on clinic practice and costs. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17:323-329.

Allison JG, Bromley HR. Unnecessary preoperative investigations: evaluation and cost analysis. Am Surg. 1996;62:686-689.

New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. 1963;24.

Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:159-241.

Preoperative tests, the use of routine preoperative tests for elective surgery-Evidence, methods and guidance. 2003.

Fischer SP. Cost-effective preoperative evaluation and testing. Chest. 1999;115(^s5):96S-100S.

Starsnic MA, Guarnieri DM, Norris MC. Efficacy and financial benefit of an anesthesiologist-direct university preadmission evaluation center. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:299-305.

Foss JF, Apfelbaum J. Economics of preoperative evaluation clinics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001;14:559-562.

Sharma GK, Sharma SB, Shaheen WH. Preoperative Testing: Contributor Information and Disclosures. 2009.

Pasternak LR. Preoperative laboratory testing: general issues and considerations. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2004;22:13-25.

Mathias LA, Guaratini AA, Gozzani JL. Exames complementares pré-operatórios: análise crítica. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2006;56:658-668.

Robbins JA, Mushlin AL. Preoperative evaluation of healthy patient. Med Clin North Am. 1979;294:1145-1156.

Narr BJ, Warner ME, Schroeder DR. Outcomes of patients with no laboratory assessment before anesthesia and a surgical procedure. Mayo Clin Proc. 1997;72:505-509.

Kaplan EB, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann AJ. The usefulness of preoperative laboratory screening. JAMA. 1985;253:3576-3581.

Parker BM, Tetzlaff JE, Litaker DL. Redefining the preoperative evaluation process and the role of anesthesiologist. J Clin Anesth. 2000;12:350-356.

Ficher SP. Development and effectiveness of an anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic in a teaching hospital. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:196-206.

Finegan BA, Rashiq S, McAlister FA. Selective ordering of preoperative investigations by anesthesiologists reduces the number and cost of tests. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:575-80.

Power LM, Thrackray NM. Reduction of preoperative investigations with the introduction of an anaesthetist: led preoperative assessment clinic. Anaesth Intensive care. 1999;27:481-488.

Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel Jr EL. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978;49:239-243.

Haynes SR, Lawler PG. An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation. Anaesthesia. 1995;50:195-199.

Mak PH, Campbell RC, Irwin MG. The ASA Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30:633-640.

5dd6d7f70e8825c20713f287 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electrónico) 0104-0014 (Impreso)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 Todos los derechos reservados.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections