Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2017.01.011
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Review Article

Importance of using basic statistics adequately in clinical research

Importância do uso adequado da estatística básica nas pesquisas clínicas

Célio Fernando de Sousa Rodrigues; Fernando José Camello de Lima; Fabiano Timbó Barbosa

Downloads: 0
Views: 1002

Abstract

Abstract Background and objective The inadequate use of basic statistics is the main responsible for scientific article misinterpretation. The purpose of this review article was to review some basic statistical topics to alert authors and readers about the importance of basic statistics proper reporting. Content A bibliographical and cross-sectional study was carried out, which analyzed publications in books and articles in the following databases: SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) and PubMed (Available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information). Medical research is not free from the risk of false positive and false negative results due to the choice of statistical tests and presence of small sample sizes. Conclusion Understanding the correct use of basic statistics leads to fewer errors in reporting the results of studies performed and in the interpretation of their conclusions.

Keywords

Biostatistics, Anesthesia, Sample size

Resumo

Resumo Justificativa e objetivo O uso inadequado da estatística básica é o maior responsável pelo erro de interpretação dos artigos científicos. O objetivo deste artigo de revisão foi rever alguns tópicos básicos de estatística para alertar autores e leitores sobre a importância do relato adequado da estatística básica. Conteúdo Foi feita pesquisa bibliográfica e transversal que analisou publicações em livros, artigos nas bases de dados SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library Online) e PubMed, do National Center for Biotechnology Information. Pesquisas na área médica não estão livres do risco de resultados falso positivos e falso negativos devido à escolha dos testes estatísticos e à presença de pequenos tamanhos de amostra. Conclusão A compreensão acerca do uso adequado da estatística básica propicia menores erros nos relatos dos resultados de estudos executados e na interpretação das suas conclusões.

Palavras-chave

Bioestatística, Anestesia, Tamanho da amostra

References

Windish DM, Diener-West M. A clinician-educator's roadmap to choosing and interpreting statistical tests. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:656-60.

Kurichi JE, Sonnad SS. Statistical methods in the surgical literature. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:476-84.

Bajwa SJ. Basics, common errors, and essentials of statistical tools and techniques in anesthesiology research. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31:547-53.

Barbosa FT, Sousa DA. Frequency of the adequate use of statistical tests of hypothesis in original articles published in the Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia between January 2008 and December 2009. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2010;60:528-36.

Hokanson JA, Luttman DJ, Weiss GB. Frequency and diversity of use of statistical techniques in oncology journals. Cancer Treat Rep. 1986;70:589-94.

Goldin J, Zhu W, Sayre JW. A review of the statistical analysis used in papers published in Clinical Radiology and British Journal of Radiology. Clin Radiol. 1996;51:47-50.

Altman DG, Gore SM, Gardner MJ. Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983;7:286-93.

Bailar JC, Mosteller F. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Amplifications and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:266-73.

Kim M. Statistical methods in arthritis & rheumatism: current trends. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3741-9.

McHugh ML. Descriptive statistics. Part I: level of measurement. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2003;8:35-47.

Twycross A, Shields L. Statistics made simple. Part 2. Standard deviation, variance and range. Paediatr Nurs. 2004;16:24.

McHugh ML. Descriptive statistics. Part II: most commonly used descriptive statistics. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2003;8:111-6.

Twycross A, Shields L. Statistics made simple. Part 1: mean, medians, and mode. Paediatr Nurs. 2004;16:32.

Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics. Part 2: descriptive statistics. Ann Emer Med. 1990;19:309-15.

Clegg F. Introduction to statistics I: descriptive statistics. Br J Hospital Med. 1987;37:356-67.

Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics. Part 3, sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and hypothesis testing. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:591-7.

Biau DJ, Jolles BM, Porcher R. P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: an explanation for new researchers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:855-62.

Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics. Part 4: statistical inference techniques in hypothesis testing. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:820-5.

Rumsey D. Testes de hipóteses mais utilizados. Estatística para Leigos. 2010:237-47.

Gaddis ML. Statistical methodology: IV. Analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and multivariate analysis of variance. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5:258-65.

Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics. Part 5: statistical inference techniques for hypothesis testing with nonparametric data. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19:1054-9.

Twycross A, Shields L. Statistics made simple. Part 4: choosing the right test. Paediatr Nurs. 2004;16:24.

Charan J, Kantharia ND. How to calculate sample size in animal studies?. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4:303-6.

Goodman NW, Hughes AO. Statistical awareness of research workers in British anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1992;68:321-4.

5dcc63390e88251737bf58f3 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections