The influence of ultrasonic radiation of low intensity in cultured fibroblast cells
Bertin, Larissa Dragonetti; Pires-Oliveira, Deise Aparecida de A.; Oliveira, Priscila Daniela; Serpeloni, Juliana Almeida; Szezerbaty, Stheace Kelly F.; Santos, João Paulo Manfre; Oliveira, Rodrigo Franco
Abstract
Introduction: In vitro and in vivo put in evidence that the Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound therapy exerts a significant influence on cell function (cytoskeleton organization, stimulation of mitochondrial activity, ATP levels and plasma membrane). Objective: This study will analyze the radiation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in fibroblast cells L 929. Method: In this study are presented the data from each exposure group average and standard deviation in each moment of evaluation (24 hours, 48 hours and 72 hours). The control group (received no radiation), 0.2 W/cm2 with 10% pulse regime (1: 9 duty cycle), 0.2 W / cm2 with 20% pulse regime (2: 8 cycle work), 0.4 W/cm2 with pulse scheme 10% (1: 9 duty cycle), 0.4 W/cm2 with pulse scheme 20% (2: 8 duty cycle). The analyzes will be performed through optical microscopy, MTT method 3 - (4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl) -2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide, within the incubation times of 24, 48 and 72 hours. Results: Given the above study, the results presented in this project will be directed to increase the stimulation process and proliferation of fibroblast cells from the pulsed ultrasonic irradiation of low intensity, correlating with the healing process, neovascularization and repair. Conclusion: Therefore, the study of the effect of ultrasound from cell culture provides us with a simple and informative model on the significant aspects of the use of physical therapy in vivo system.
Keywords
References
1. Kitchen, S. Eletroterapia: Prática baseada em evidências. 2a ed. bras. Barueri-SP: Manole, 2003.
2. Olsson, D.C. et al. Estimulação ultrasônicapulsada e contínua no processo cicatricial de ratos submetidos à celiotomia. Revista Ciência Rural, v.36, n.3, p.61-6, 2006.
3. Tang CH, Yang RS, Huang TH, Lu DY, Chuang WJ, Huang TF, et al. Ultrasound stimulates cyclooxygenase-2 expression and increases bone formation through integrin, focal adhesion kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and akt pathway in osteoblasts. Mol Pharmacol. 2006;69(6):2047-57.
4. Paliwal, S.; mitragotri, s. Therapeutic opportunities in biological responses of ultrasound. Ultrasonics 48 (2008) 271-278.
5. Zhou S, Schmelz A, Seufferlein T, Li Y, Zhao J, Bachem MG. Molecular mechanisms of low- intensity pulsed ultrasound in human skin fibroblasts. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279(52):54463-9.
6. Mendonça AC, Ferreira AS, Barbieri CH, Thomazine JA, Mazzer N. Efeitos do ultra-som pulsado de baixa intensidade sobre a cicatrização por segunda intensão de lesão cutâneas totais em ratos.Acta Ortop Bras. 2006;14(3):152-7.
7. Blume K, Matsuo E, Lopes MS, Lopes LG. Dosimetria proposta para o tratamento por ultra-som: uma revisão de literatura. Fisioter Mov. 2005;18(3):55-64.
8. Mizrahi N, Seliktar D, Kimmel E. Ultrasound-induced angiogenic response in endothelial cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(11):1818-29.
9. Johns LD. Nonthermal effects of therapeutic ultrasound: the frequency resonance hypothesis. J Athl Train. 2002;37(3):293-9.
10. Pires-Oliveira et al., Assessment of cytoskeleton and endoplasmatic reticulum of fibroblast cells submitted to low-level laser therapy and low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Photomed. Laser Surg. v. 27, n. 3, p. 461-466, 2009.
11. Udroiu, Sgura A, Vignoli L, Bologna M A, D’Amen M, Salvi D, et al. 2014. “Micronucleus test on Triturus carnifex as a tool for environmental biomonitoring.” Environmental and molecular mutagenesis doi:10.1002/m.21914.
12. Silva JMN, Carvalho JP, Moura Júnior MJ, Arisawa ELS, Martin AA, Sá HP, et al. Estudo da ação do ultrassom terapêutico em modelo experimental de tendinite em ratos Wistar. ConsSaúde. 2010; 9(4):625-32.
13. Oliveira AAP, Oliveira RF, Soares CP. Comparação do efeito da terapia laser de baixa potencia e irradiação ultra-sônica pulsada de baixa intensidade in vitro. Consciencia e Saúde. 2008;7(4):457-462.
14. Taskan, i.; ozyazgan, i,; tercan, m,; kardas, hy,; balkanli s,; saraymen, s,; zorlu, s,; ozugul y,; a comparative study of the effect of ultrasound of electrostimulation on wound healing in rats. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1997.
15. Liang, H. et al. Opmisation of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer (sonoporation) in skeletal muscle cells. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. v. 30, n. 11, p. 1523-29, 2004.
16. Greenleaf, W. J. et al. Artificial cavitation nuclei significantly enhance acoustically induced cell transfection. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. v. 24, n. 4, p. 587-95, 1998.
17. Denir, H,; Balay, h,; kirnap, na,; a comparasion of the effects of electrical stimulation and laser treatment on experimental wound healing in rats. J rehabil res dev. 2004.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email