Evaluación de la calidad del contenido en páginas web de Google sobre Cirugía Ortognática
Evaluation of the quality of the content in Google web pages about Orthognathic Surgery
Ana Catalina Torres Martínez, Diana Chacón Otárola, Silvia Pacheco Rodríguez
Resumen
Objetivo: evaluar la calidad de la información encontrada en páginas web por medio del buscador Google™ sobre cirugía ortognática en idioma español. Métodos: se utilizaron tres herramientas: Riordain y McCreary para categorizar el contenido, DISCERN y JAMA para evaluar la calidad, posteriormente se realizó la estadística descriptiva con las pruebas Chi cuadrado y Kruskal Wallis para comparar las variables. Resultados: de 100 sitios consultados, 49 cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión. Al evaluar la especialización, el 75% de los sitios visitados estaba dedicado a cirugía ortognática y tratamientos afines. El 97,7% de los sitios se basa en hechos médicos y no hay casi evidencia de ensayos clínicos en los sitios visitados (1,0%). Con respecto a JAMA, las variables más ausentes fueron atribución (39 páginas) y fecha de publicación y actualización (36 páginas); sin embargo, no se observó diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre la afiliación de las páginas web y las variables del instrumento (p= 0,111). Según DISCERN, la mayor parte del contenido de las páginas estudiadas fue regular con 41,7% o pobre con 39,6 %, solamente el 18.8% obtuvo una calificación adecuada. Además, no se mostró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre afiliación de las páginas web y la calificación de contenido según DISCERN (p = 0,337). Conclusión: los pacientes están expuestos a una gran variedad fuentes de información de calidad de contenido pobre o regular sobre cirugía ortognática y otros temas de salud.
Palabras clave
Abstract
Objective: the aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the information found on web pages through Google™ search engine on “orthognathic surgery” in Spanish. Methods: three instruments were used: Riordain and McCreary to categorize the content; DISCERN and JAMA to assess quality; Subsequently, descriptive statistics were performed with the Chi square and Kruskal Wallis tests to compare the variables. Results: Of 100 sites consulted, 49 met the inclusion criteria. When evaluating the Specialization, 75% of the websites were dedicated to orthognathic surgery and related treatments. 97.7% of the sites are based on medical facts, and there is almost no evidence of clinical trials in the studied sites (1%). Regarding JAMA, the most absent variables were Attribution (39 pages) and Currency (36 pages). However, no statistically significant difference was found between the affiliation of the web pages and the variables of the instrument (p= 0.111). According to DISCERN, most of the content of the pages studied was regular 41.7% or poor 39.6%, only 18.8% obtained an adequate rating. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between website affiliation and DISCERN content rating (p = 0.337). Conclusions: Patients are exposed to a wide variety of quality information sources with poor or regular content on orthognathic surgery and other health topics.
Keywords
Referencias
Aslam, S. (2021). YouTube by the numbers: stats, demographics & fun facts: Omnicore. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/ Consultado: 22 de febrero 2022.
Aldairy, T., Laverick, S., & McIntyre, G. T. (2012). Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid? European Journal of Orthodontics, 34(4), 466–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr046
Bavbek, N. C., & Tuncer, B. B. (2017). Information on the Internet Regarding Orthognathic Surgery in Turkey: Is It an Adequate Guide for Potential Patients? Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 30(3), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2017.17027
Bhamrah, G., Ahmad, S., & Nimhurchadha, S. (2015). Internet discussion forums, an information and support resource for orthognathic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 147(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.020
Bhamrah, G., Ahmad, S., & NiMhurchadha, S. (2015a). Internet discussion forums, an information and support resource for orthognathic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics, 147(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.020
Bhamrah, G., Ahmad, S., & NiMhurchadha, S. (2015b). Internet discussion forums, an information and support resource for orthognathic patients. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 147(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.08.020
Charnock, D. (1998). The discern handbook:Quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices. University of Oxford and The British Library, 1–55. http://www.discern-genetics.org/discern.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.webcitation.org/6MhdgErhv
Engelmann, J., Fischer, C., & Nkenke, E. (2020). Quality assessment of patient information on orthognathic surgery on the internet. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery : Official Publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery, 48(7), 661–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.05.004
Hegarty, E., Campbell, C., Grammatopoulos, E., DiBiase, A. T., Sherriff, M., & Cobourne, M. T. (2017). YouTubeTM as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. Journal of Orthodontics, 44(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2017.1319010
Hu, X., Pan, H., He, W., Hua, H., & Yan, Z. (2017). Evaluation of the content quality of websites for recurrent aphthous ulcers and oral lichen planus. BMC Oral Health, 17(170). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0467-1
Irwin, J. Y., Thyvalikakath, T., Spallek, H., Wali, T., Kerr, A. R., & Schleyer, T. (2011). English and Spanish oral cancer information on the internet: a pilot surface quality and content evaluation of oral cancer web sites. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 71(2), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2010.00207.x
Jung Hwan Jo, Eui Joo Kim, Ji Rak Kim, Moon Jong Kim, Jin Woo Chung, & Ji Woon Park. (2018). Quality and readability of internet-based information on halitosis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 215–222. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2212440317312051
Leira, Y., Castelo-Baz, P., Pérez-Sayáns, M., Blanco, J., & Lorenzo-Pouso, A. I. (2019). Available patient-centered Internet information on peri-implantitis. Can our patients understand it? Clinical Oral Investigations, 23(4), 1569–1574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2583-y
López-Jornet P, C.-A. F. (2010). The quality of internet information relating to oral leukoplakia. Pub Med US National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, 15(5), 727–731. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.15.e727
López-Jornet, P., & Camacho-Alonso, F. (2009). The quality of internet sites providing information relating to oral cancer. Oral Oncology, 45(9), e95–e98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.03.017
Lorenzo-Pouso, A., Perez-Sayans, M., Kujan, O., Castelo-Baz, P., Chamorro-Petronacci, C., Garcia-Garcia, A., & Blanco-Carrion, A. (2019). Patient-centered web-based information on oral lichen planus: Quality and readability. Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 24(4), e461-467. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22992
Ni Riordain R, M. C. (2009). Head and neck cancer information on the internet: type, accuracy and content. Pub Med US National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, 45(8), 675–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.10.006.
Olkun, H. K., & Demirkaya, A. A. (2018). Evaluation of internet information about lingual orthodontics using DISCERn and JAMA tools. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 31(2), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17042
Olkun HK, D. A. (2018). Evaluation of Internet Information about Lingual Orthodontics Using DISCERN and JAMA Tools. Pub Med US National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, 31(2), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17042.
Pithon, M. M., & dos Santos, E. S. (2014). Information available on the internet about pain after orthognathic surgery: a careful review. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 19(6), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.19.6.086-092.oar
Raj, S., Sharma, V. L., Singh, A. J., & Goel, S. (2016). Evaluation of Quality and Readability of Health Information Websites Identified through India’s Major Search Engines. Advances in Preventive Medicine, 2016, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4815285
Riordain RN, H. T. (2014). Content and quality of website information on the treatment of oral ulcers. Pub Med US National Library of Medicine, National Institute of Health, 217(7), E15. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.886.
Silberg, W. M. (1997). Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet. Jama, 277(15), 1244. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540390074039
SUTEL. (2022). 86 de cada 100 habitantes tiene acceso a Internet. https://www.sutel.go.cr/noticias/comunicados-de-prensa/86-de-cada-100-habitantes-tiene-acceso-internet
Submitted date:
01/04/2022
Accepted date:
27/04/2022
Publication date:
21/10/2022
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
CiteULike
Email