ERGONOMIA NO SISTEMA DE GESTÃO DA SEGURANÇA E SAÚDE NO TRABALHO
ERGONOMICS IN THE OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ERGONOMÍA NODO SISTEMA DE GESTIÓN DESDE SEGURIDAD Y SALUD EN EL TRABAJO
Carmen Elena Martinez Riascos, Leila Amaral Gontijo, Eugenio Andrés Díaz Merino
Resumo
O Sistema de Gestão de Segurança e Saúde no Trabalho (SGSST) busca identificar e avaliar os riscos ocupacionais e atender aos requisitos legais de cada setor econômico. A
ergonomia, por sua parte, também está relacionada à proteção da saúde dos trabalhadores estabelecendo uma estreita relação, nos seus domínios de especialização (físico, cognitivo e organizacional). Neste sentido, este artigo tem como objetivo caracterizar os artigos que abordam a Ergonomia e o Sistema de Gestão de Segurança e Saúde Ocupacional (SGSST) e identificar quais domínios da ergonomia foram utilizados. Esta pesquisa qualitativa escolheu o instrumento Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C), para a seleção da literatura, identificação, análise e reflexão das características de SGSST. Foram selecionados 31 artigos como o fragmento de literatura científica, realizando uma análise bibliométrica avançada, identificando características da abordagem metodológica e as técnicas utilizadas para a coleta de dados. Apresentam-se a lista dos métodos ou ferramentas analisados ou usados e identificaram-se os aspectos dos domínios da ergonomia física, cognitiva e organizacional considerados pelos pesquisadores em seus estudos. Identificou-se que a ergonomia cognitiva está sendo abordada desde as atividades e treinamento, começa a ser trabalhada a avaliação de desempenho do trabalhador e o controle do estresse. No relativo aos aspectos organizacionais a incursão da cultura organizacional nas empresas vem contribuindo para trabalhar na gestão das atividades de prevenção com os trabalhadores.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
The Occupational Health and Safety Management System (SGSST) seeks to identify and evaluate occupational risks and meet the legal requirements of each economic sector. Ergonomics, for its part, is also related to protecting workers' health, establishing a close relationship, in their domains of specialization (physical, cognitive and organizational). In this sense, this article aims to characterize the articles that address Ergonomics and the Occupational Health and Safety Management System (SGSST) and identify which domains of ergonomics were used. This qualitative research chose the Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (ProKnow-C) instrument to select literature, identify, analyze and reflect on SGSST characteristics. 31 articles were selected as a fragment of scientific literature, carrying out an advanced bibliometric analysis, identifying characteristics of the methodological approach and the techniques used for data collection. A list of methods or tools analyzed or used is presented and aspects of the domains of physical, cognitive and organizational ergonomics considered by researchers in their studies are identified. It was identified that cognitive ergonomics is being addressed from activities and training, worker performance assessment and stress control are beginning to be worked on. Regarding organizational aspects, the incursion of organizational culture in companies has contributed to working on the management of prevention activities with workers.
Translation version DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/rae.v15n2.e202108.en
Keywords
Resumen
EL Sistema de Gestión de Seguridad y Salud nodo Trabajar (SGSST) buscar identificar y evaluar riesgos laborales y cumplir con los requisitos legales de cada sector económico. La ergonomía, por su parte, también se relaciona con la protección de la salud de los trabajadores, estableciendo una estrecha relación, en sus dominios de especialización (físico, cognitivo y organizacional). En este sentido, este artículo tiene como objetivo caracterizar los artículos que abordan la Ergonomía y el Sistema de Gestión de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo (SGSST) e identificar cual dominios desde ergonomía Ellos eran usado. Este buscar cualitativo el escogió el instrumento Proceso de Desarrollo del ConocimientoConstructivista (ProKnow-C) , para la selección de literatura, identificación, análisis y reflexión sobre las características de los SGSST. Se seleccionaron 31 artículos como fragmento de literatura científica, realizándose un análisis bibliométrico avanzado, identificando características desde acercarse metodológico y hacia técnicas usado para la recopilación de datos. Se presenta una lista de métodos o herramientas analizados o utilizados y se identifican aspectos de los dominios de la ergonomía física, cognitiva y organizacional considerados por los investigadores en sus estudios. Se identificó que desde las actividades y capacitaciones se está abordando la ergonomía cognitiva, se comienza a trabajar la evaluación del desempeño de los trabajadores y el control del estrés. En cuanto a los aspectos organizacionales, la incursión de la cultura organizacional en las empresas ha contribuido a trabajar en la gestión de actividades de prevención con los trabajadores.
DOI de la versión traducida: https://doi.org/10.4322/rae.v15n2.e202108.es
Palabras clave
Referencias
Abu-Khader, M. M. (2004). Impact of Human Behaviour on Process Safety Management in Developing Countries. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 82(6), 431–437. https://doi.org/10.1205/psep.82.6.431.53206
Asadzadeh, S. M., Azadeh, A., Negahban, A., & Sotoudeh, A. (2013). Assessment and improvement of integrated HSE and macroergonomics factors by fuzzy cognitive maps: The case of a large gas refinery. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 26(6), 1015– 1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2013.03.007
Boatca, M. – E., & Cirjaliu, B. (2015). A Proposed Approach for an Efficient Ergonomics Intervention in Organizations. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23(October 2014), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00411-6
Cardoso, T. L., Ensslin, S. R., Ensslin, L., Ripoll-Feliu, V. M., & Dutra, A. (2015). Reflexões para avanço na área de Avaliação e Gestão do Desempenho das universidades: uma análise da literatura científica. Seminários Em Administração (XVIII SEMEAD). https://doi.org/http://sistema.semead.com.br/18semead/resultado/trabalhosPDF/205.pdf
Colombo, S., & Demichela, M. (2008). The systematic integration of human factors into safety analyses: An integrated engineering approach. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93(12), 1911–1921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2008.03.029
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
De Oliveira Lacerda, R. T., Ensslin, L., & Ensslin, S. R. (2014). Research opportunities in strategic management field: A performance measurement approach. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 15(2), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2014.060165
Dutra, A., Ripoll-Feliu, V. ., Fillol, A. ., Ensslin, S. ., & Ensslin, L. (2015). The construction of knowledge from the scientific literature about the theme seaport performance evaluation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(2), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2015-0056
Ensslin, L, Ensslin, S. ., Dutra, A., Nunes, N. ., & Reis, C. (2017). BPM governance: a literature analysis of performance evaluation. Business Process Management Journal, 23(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-11-2015-0159
Ensslin, Leonardo, Ensslin, S. R., & Pacheco, G. C. (2012). Um estudo sobre segurança em estádios de futebol baseado na análise bibliométrica da literatura internacional A study about safety in football stadiums based on bibliometric analysis of international literature. Perspectivas Em Ciência de Informação, 17(2), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413- 99362012000200006
Ensslin, S. R., Ensslin, L., Imlau, J. M., & Chaves, L. C. (2014). Processo de Mapeamento das Publicações Científicas de um Tema : Portfólio Bibliográfico e Análise Bibliométrica sobre avaliação de desempenho de cooperativas de produção agropecuária. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 52(3), 587–608. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-20032014000300010
Eskandari, D., Gharabagh, M. J., Barkhordari, A., Gharari, N., Panahi, D., Gholami, A., & Teimori-Boghsani, G. (2021). Development of a scale for assessing the organization’s safety performance based fuzzy ANP. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 69(October 2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104342
Garrigou, A., Peeters, S., Jackson, M., Sagory, P., & Carballeda, G. (2007). Contribuições da Ergonomia à Prevenção dos Riscos Profissionais. In Blucher (Ed.), Ergonomia (pp. 423–439).
Givehchi, S., Hemmativaghef, E., & Hoveidi, H. (2017). Association between safety leading indicators and safety climate levels. Journal of Safety Research, 62, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.05.003
González, B. A., Adenso-Díaz, B., & González Torre, P. (2003). Ergonomic performance and quality relationship: An empirical evidence case. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 31(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00116-6
Haro, E., & Kleiner, B. M. (2008). Macroergonomics as an organizing process for systems safety. Applied Ergonomics, 39(4), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.02.018
Hoffmeister, K., Gibbons, A., Schwatka, N., & Rosecrance, J. (2015). Ergonomics Climate Assessment: A measure of operational performance and employee well-being. Applied Ergonomics, 50, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.03.011 IEA. (2019). International Ergonomics Association. Definition and Domains of Ergonomics. http://www.iea.cc
Iida, I., & Buarque, L. (2016). Ergonomia: Projeto e produção (3rd ed.). Blucher. ISO. (2018). ISO 45001:2018 - Occupational health and safety management systems — Requirements with guidance for use (p. 47).
Kariuki, S. G., & Löwe, K. (2007). Integrating human factors into process hazard analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92(12), 1764–1773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.01.002
Kirwan, B. (1998). Safety management assessment and task analysis: A missing link? (pp. 67–92). Oxford: Elsevier. In A. Hale & M. Baram (Eds.), Safety management: The challenge of change (pp. 67–92).
Laing, a C., Cole, D. C., Theberge, N., Wells, R. P., Kerr, M. S., & Frazer, M. B. (2007). Effectiveness of a participatory ergonomics intervention in improving communication and psychosocial exposures. Ergonomics, 50(7), 1092–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701308708.
Lima, F.P.A. et al. (2015). Barragens, barreiras de prevenção e limites da segurança: para aprender com a catástrofe de Mariana. Rev. bras. saúde ocup. [online], v. 40, n. 132, p. 118- 3 120. https://doi.org/10.1590/0303-7657ED02132115.
Maggi, B., & Tersac, G. de. (2004). O trabalho e a abordagem ergonômica. In A ergonomia em busca de seus princípios: debates epistemológicos.
Edgard Blucher. Mattson Molnar, M., Von Thiele Schwarz, U., Hellgren, J., Hasson, H., & Tafvelin, S. (2019). Leading for Safety: A Question of Leadership Focus. Safety and Health at Work, 10(2), 180– 187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2018.12.001
Mearns, K., Whitaker, S. M., & Flin, R. (2003). Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments. Safety Science, 41(8), 641–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(02)00011-5
, S. (2010). Ergonomics and occupational safety and health: An ILO perspective. Applied Ergonomics, 41(6), 744–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.004
Nunes, I. L. (2015). Integration of ergonomics and lean six sigma. A model proposal. Procedía Manufacturing, 3, 890–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.124
Nwankwo, C. D., Theophilus, S. C., & Arewa, A. O. (2020). A comparative analysis of process safety management (PSM) systems in the process industry. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 66(June 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104171
Payne, S. C., Bergman, M. E., Rodríguez, J. M., Beus, J. M., & Henning, J. B. (2010). Leading and lagging: Process safety climate-incident relationships at one year. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23(6), 806–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.06.004
Radjiyev, A., Qiu, H., Xiong, S., & Nam, K. H. (2015). Ergonomics and sustainable development in the past two decades (1992-2011): Research trends and how ergonomics can contribute to sustainable development. Applied Ergonomics, 46(PA), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.07.006
Sgourou, E., Katsakiori, P., Goutsos, S., & Manatakis, E. (2010). Assessment of selected safety performance evaluation methods in regards to their conceptual, methodological and practical characteristics. Safety Science, 48(8), 1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.001
Shikdar, A. A., & Sawaqed, N. M. (2004). Ergonomics, and occupational health and safety in the oil industry: A managers’ response. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 47(2–3), 223– 232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2004.07.004
Sinelnikov, S., Inouye, J., & Kerper, S. (2015). Using leading indicators to measure occupational health and safety performance. Safety Science, 72, 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.010
Tamim, N., Laboureur, D. M., Hasan, A. R., & Mannan, M. S. (2019). Developing leading indicators-based decision support algorithms and probabilistic models using Bayesian network to predict kicks while drilling. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 121, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.021
Thomson Corporation. (2018). EndNote X9. Thomson Corporation. Valmorbida, S. M. ., Ensslin, S. ., Ensslin, L., & Ripoll-Feliu, V. . (2016). Rankings universitários mundiais: que dizem os estudos internacionais? REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educación, 14(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2016.14.2.001
Valmorbida, S. M. I., & Ensslin, S. R. (2015). Avaliação de Desempenho de Rankings Universitários: Revisão da Literatura e diretrizes para futuras investigações. Anais Do Encontro Da ANPAD (XXXIX EnANPAD 2015).
Vogt, J., Leonhardt, J., Koper, B., & Pennig, S. (2010). Human factors in safety and business management. Ergonomics, 53(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903248801
