Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/resr/article/doi/10.1590/1234-56781806-94790053s01004
Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural
Artigo de pesquisa

Percepção dos Consumidores Relativamente à Carne de Bovino: cenários de escolha a partir de grupos de discussão

Inês Viegas; José Manuel Lima Santos; Magda Aguiar Fontes

Downloads: 0
Views: 1176

Resumo

Nas economias desenvolvidas, a segurança dos alimentos, o bem­-estar animal e o ambiente têm vindo a assumir relevância nas preocupações dos consumidores. Procurámos saber, através da metodologia dos grupos de discussão (focus groups) realizados em duas cidades de Portugal, Lisboa e Porto, as preocupações e perceções dos consumidores relativamente a estes atributos, os quais são essencialmente acreditados. Este conhecimento é fundamental para a aplicação posterior de métodos de preferências declaradas. Foi ainda possível obter, com base em exercícios de seleção entre carnes diferenciadas, e através de um modelo logit, intervalos de preços passíveis de serem utilizados posteriormente na definição de cenários em experiências de escolha (método de preferências declaradas).

Palavras-chave

segurança dos alimentos, bem-estar animal, ambiente, cenários de escolha, grupos de discussão.

References

ADAMOWICZ, W., LOUVIERE, J. e SWAIT, J. Introduction to attribute-based stated choice methods. NOAA - National Oceanic And Athmosferic Administration, 1998.

AGUIAR FONTES, M., PINTO, A. S. e LEMOS, J. P. C. Qualidade na carne de bovino: atributos e perceção. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências Veterinárias, RPCV, 110, 577-580, p. 21-29, 2011.

AGUIAR FONTES, M. et al. Is beef differentiation a real source of competitiveness? A combination of procedures to achieve an answer. In: FANFANI, R. et al. (Org.). Competitiveness in agriculture and food industry: US and EU perspectives. Bologna: Bup, 2008.

ALFNES, F. Stated preferences for imported and hormone-treated beef: application of a mixed logit model. European Review of Agriculture Economics, v. 31, p. 19-37, 2004.

ANGULO, A. e Gil, J. M. Risk perception and consumer willingness to pay for certified beef in Spain. Food Quality And Preference, v. 18, p. 1106-1117, 2007.

BANOVIC, M. et al. Consumers' quality perception of national branded; national store branded and imported store branded beef. Meat Science, v. 84, p. 54-65, 2010.

BECH, A. et al. Consumers' quality perception. In: FREWER, L., RISVIK, E. e SCHIFFERSTEIN, H. (Org.). Food, people and society. A European perspective of consumer's food choices. New York: Springer, 2001.

BEHRENS, J. H. et al. Consumer purchase habits and views on food safety: a Brazilian study. Food Control, 21, 963-969, 2010.

BERNUÉS, A., OLAIZOLA, A. e CORCORAN, K. Labelling information demanded by european consumers and relationships with purchasing motives, quality and safety of meat. Meat Science, p. 1095-1106, 2003.

BLOKHUIS, H. et al. Animal welfare's impact on the food chain. Trends in Food Science and Technology, v. 19, p. S79-S87, 2008.

CASWELL, J. A., BREDAHL, M. E. e HOOKER, N. H. How quality management metasystems are affecting the food industry. Review of Agricultural Economics, v. 20, p. 547-557, 1998.

DE CARLOS, P. et al. Analysis of consumer perceptions on quality and food safety in the Spanish beef market: a future application in new product development. In: XIth Congress Of The Eaae "the future of rural europe in the global agri-food system". Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005.

DE PASSILLÉ, A. M. e RUSHEN, J. Food safety and environmental issues in animal welfare. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz., v. 24, p. 757-766, 2005.

FEARNE, A., HORNIBROOK, S. e DEDMAN, S. The management of perceived risk in the food supply chain: a comparative study of retailer-led beef quality assurance achemes in Germany and Italy. International Food Aand Agribusiness Management Review, v. 4, p. 19-36, 2001.

FISCHHOFF, B. e FURBY, L. Measuring values: a conceptual framework for interpreting transactions with special reference to contingent valuation of visibility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, p. 147-184, 1988.

GRUNERT, K. G. Current issues in the understanding of consumer food choice. Trends in Food Science and Technology, v. 13, p. 275-285, 2002.

GRUNERT, K. G. Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand. European Review of Agricultural Economics, v. 32, p. 369-391, 2005.

GRUNERT, K. G., BREDHAL, L. e BRUNSO, K. Consumer perception of meat quality and implications for product development in the meat sector - a review. Meat Science, v. 66, p. 259-272, 2004.

HANLEY, N., WRIGHT, R. E. e ADAMOWICZ, V. Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics, v. 11, p. 413-428, 1998.

HARPER, G. e HENSON, S. Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice. Consumer concerns about animal welfare and the impact on food choice. European Commission, 2001.

HARPER, G. e MAKATOUNI, A. Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal, v. 104, p. 287-299, 2002.

HOYOS, D. The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics, v. 69, p. 1595-1603, 2010.

KALLAS, Z., GÓMEZ-LIMÓN, J. A. e ARRIAZA, M. Are citizens willing to pay for agricultural multifunctionality? Agricultural Economics, v. 36, p. 405-419, 2007.

KORZEN, S. e LASSEN, J. Meat in a context. On the relation between perceptions and contexts. Appetite, v. 54, p. 274-281, 2010.

KRUEGER, R. A. e CASEY, M. A. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide For Applied Research, Sage Publications, Incorporated, 2008.

LAGERKVIST, C. J. e HESS, S. A meta-analysis of consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare. European Review of Agricultural Economics, v. 38, p. 55-78, 2011.

LOUVIERE, J., HENSHER, D. A. e SWAIT, J. Stated Choice Methods, Analysis And Applications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.

LUSK, J. L., NILSSON, T. e FOSTER, K. Public preferences and private choices: effect of altruism and free riding on demand for environmentally certified pork. Environmental and Resource Economics, v. 36, p. 499-521, 2007.

NGAPO, T. M. et al. Consumer perceptions: pork and pig production. Insights from France, England, Sweden and Denmark. Meat Science, v. 66, p. 125-134, 2003.

NORTHEN, J. Quality attributes and quality cues. effective communication in the UK meat supply chain. British Food Journal, v. 102, p. 230-245, 2000.

OLSON, J. C. e JACOBY, J. Cue utilization of the quality perception process. In: VENKATESAN, M. (Org.). Proceedings of the Third Annual Conference of the Association for Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research, University of Iowa, Iowa City, 1972.

OLYNK, N. e ORTEGA, D. L. Consumer preferences for verified dairy cattle management practices in processed dairy products. Food Control, v. 30, p. 298-305, 2013.

POUTA, E. et al. Consumer choice of broiler meat: the effects of country of origin and production methods. Food Quality and Preference, v. 21, p. 539-546, 2010.

PROJECT AGRO 422. Project Agro 422 - Uma Política De Qualidade Para a carne de bovino em portugal: modos de produção, gostos e preferências dos consumidores, 2004-2007.

RESURRECCION, A. V. A. Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meat products. Meat Science, v. 66, p. 11-20, 2003.

ROSE, J. M. et al. Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives. Transportation Research Part B, v. 42, p. 395-406, 2008.

SEPÚLVEDA, W., MAZA, M. T. e MANTECÓN, A. R. Factors that affect and motivate the purchase of quality-lavelled beef in Spain. Meat Science, v. 80, p. 1282-1289, 2008.

STEENKAMP, J. B. E. M. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research, v. 21, p. 309-333, 1990.

TROY, D. J. e KERRY, J. P. Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Science, v. 86, p. 214-226, 2010.

VANHONACKER, F. et al. Citizens' views on farm animal welfare and related information provision: exploratory insights from Flandres, Belgium. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, v. 23, p. 551-569, 2010.

VANHONACKER, F. et al. Flemish consumer attitudes towards more sustainable food choices. Appetite, v. 62, p. 7-16, 2013.

VERBEKE, W. e VIAENE, W. Beliefs, attitude and behaviour towards fresh meat consumption in Belgium: empirical evidence from a consumer survey. Food Quality and Preference, v. 10, p. 437-445, 1999.

VERBEKE, W. e VACKIER, I. Profile and effects of consumer involvement in fresh meat. Meat Science, v. 67, p. 159-168, 2004.

VERBEKE, W. e ROOSEN, J. Market differentiation potential of country-of-origin, quality and traceability labeling. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, v. 10, p. 20-35, 2009.

VERBEKE, W. et al. European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork. Meat Science, v. 84, p. 284-292, 2010a.

VERBEKE, W. et al. European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality guarantee. Insights from a qualitative study in four eu countries. Appetite, v. 54, p. 289-296, 2010b.

VIEGAS, I., SANTOS, J. L. e AGUIAR FONTES, M. Consumers' Perceptions towards Beef Safety, Animal Welfare and Environment: Getting Insights and Choice Scenarios from Focus Groups. Submitted to Appetite, set. 2013a.

VIEGAS, I. et al. Beef Credence attributes: implications of substitution effects on consumers' WTP. Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 65, n. 3, p. 600-615, 2014.

WEZEMAEL, L. V. et al. European consumers and beef safety: perceptions, expectations and uncertainty reduction strategies. Food Control, v. 21, p. 835-844, 2010.
 

5ced3cf60e88258b6fa63c10 resr Articles
Links & Downloads

resr

Share this page
Page Sections