Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942013000100004
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Bloqueio seletivo dos nervos supraescapular e axilar promove analgesia satisfatória e menor grau de bloqueio motor: comparação com o bloqueio interescalênico

Selective suprascapular and axillary nerve block provides adequate analgesia and minimal motor block: comparison with interscalene block

Patrícia Falcão Pitombo; Rogério Meira Barros; Marcos Almeida Matos; Norma Sueli Pinheiro Módolo

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942013000100004 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.63, n1, p.52-58, 2013
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 2
Views: 1143

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVO: Cirurgias artroscópicas do ombro cursam com intensa dor pós-operatória. Diversas técnicas analgésicas têm sido preconizadas. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar o bloqueio dos nervos supraescapular e axilar nas cirurgias artroscópicas de ombro com a abordagem interescalênica do plexo braquial. MÉTODO: Sessenta e oito pacientes foram alocados em dois grupos de 34, de acordo com a técnica utilizada: grupo interescalênico (GI) e grupo seletivo (GS), sendo ambas as abordagens realizadas com neuroestimulador. No GI, após resposta motora adequada foram injetados 30 mL de levopubivacaína em excesso enantiomérico de 50% a 0,33% com adrenalina 1:200.000. No GS, após resposta motora do nervo supraescapular e axilar, foram injetados 15 mL da mesma substância em cada nervo. Em seguida, realizada anestesia geral. Variáveis avaliadas: tempo para realização dos bloqueios, analgesia, consumo de opioide, bloqueio motor, estabilidade cardiocirculatória, satisfação e aceitabilidade pelo paciente. RESULTADOS: Tempo para execução do bloqueio interescalênico foi significativamente menor que para realização do bloqueio seletivo. Analgesia foi significativamente maior no pós-operatório imediato no GI e no pós-operatório tardio no GS. Consumo de morfina foi significativamente maior na primeira hora no GS. Bloqueio motor foi significativamente menor no GS. Estabilidade cardiocirculatória, satisfação e aceitabilidade da técnica pelo paciente não diferiram entre os grupos. Ocorreu uma falha no GI e duas no GS. CONCLUSÕES: Ambas as técnicas são seguras, eficazes com mesmo grau de satisfação e aceitabilidade. O bloqueio seletivo de ambos os nervos apresentou analgesia satisfatória, com a vantagem de proporcionar bloqueio motor restrito ao ombro.

Palavras-chave

ANALGESIA: Pós-operatório, ANESTÉSICOS: Local, levobupivacaína, CIRURGIA: Ortopédica, TÉCNICAS ANESTÉSICAS: Regional, plexo braquial

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Shoulder arthroscopic surgeries evolve with intense postoperative pain. Several analgesic techniques have been advocated. The aim of this study was to compare suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks in shoulder arthroscopy using the interscalene approach to brachial plexus blockade. METHODS: According to the technique used, sixty-eight patients were allocated into two groups: interscalene group (IG, n = 34) and selective group (SG, n = 34), with neurostimulation approach used for both techniques. After appropriate motor response, IG received 30 mL of 0.33% levobupivacaine in 50% enantiomeric excess with adrenalin 1:200,000. After motor response of suprascapular and axillary nerves, SG received 15 mL of the same substance on each nerve. General anesthesia was then administered. Variables assessed were time to perform the blocks, analgesia, opioid consumption, motor block, cardiovascular stability, patient satisfaction and acceptability. RESULTS: Time for interscalene blockade was significantly shorter than for selective blockade. Analgesia was significantly higher in the immediate postoperative period in IG and in the late postoperative period in SG. Morphine consumption was significantly higher in the first hour in SG. Motor block was significantly lower in SG. There was no difference between groups regarding cardiocirculatory stability and patient satisfaction and acceptability. Failure occurred in IG (1) and SG (2). CONCLUSIONS: Both techniques are safe, effective, and with the same degree of satisfaction and acceptability. The selective blockade of both nerves showed satisfactory analgesia, with the advantage of providing motor block restricted to the shoulder.

Keywords

Anesthesia, Conduction, Anesthetics, Local, Brachial Plexus, Orthopedic Procedures, Shoulder Joint

References

Fredrickson MJ, Krishnan S, Chen CY. Postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery: a critical appraisal and review of current techniques. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:608-624.

Busfield BT, Romero DM. Pain pump use after shoulder arthroscopy as a cause of glenohumeral chondrolysis. Arthroscopy. 2009;25:647-652.

Hansen BP, Beck CL, Beck EP, Townsley RW. Postarthroscopic glenohumeral chondrolysis. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35.

Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: Its etiology, treatment, and prevention. Anesthesiology. 1992;77:162-184.

Singelyn FJ, Lhotel L, Fabre B. Pain relief after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a comparison of intraarticular analgesia, suprascapular nerve block, and interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:589-592.

Balas GI. Regional anesthesia for surgery on the shoulder. Anesth Analg. 1971;50:1036-1041.

Wedel DJ. Nerve blocks. Miller's Anesthesia. 1994:1535-1564.

Barber FA. Suprascapular nerve block for shoulder arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2005;21.

Emery P. Suprascapular nerve block for chronic shoulder pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Br Med J. 1989;299:1079-1080.

Vecchio PC, Adebajo AO, Hazleman BL. Suprascapular nerve block for persistent rotator cuff lesions. J Rheumatol. 1993;20:453-454.

Checcucci G, Allegra A, Bigazzi P, Gianesello L, Ceruso M, Gritti G. A new technique for regional anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder sugery based on a suprascapular nerve block and an axillary nerve block: an evaluation of the first results. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:689-696.

Abramson J.H., Gahlinger Paul M. Programa Pepi [Computer programs for epidemiologists]. .

Bromage PR. A comparasion of the hydrochloride and carbon dioxide salts of lidocaine and prilocaine in epidural analgesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1965;16(^sSuppl):55-69.

Thompson JC. Atlas de anatomia ortopédica de Netter. 2004:66-69.

Price DJ. The shoulder block: a new alternative to interscalene brachial plexus blockade for the control of postoperative shoulder pain. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:575-581.

Roark . Suprascapular nerve block at the spinoglenoid notch. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28:361-362.

Meier G, Bauereis C, Maurer H. The modified technique of continuous supraescapular nerve block: A safe technique in the treatment of shoulder pain. Anaesthesist. 2002;51:747-753.

Feigl GC, Anderhuber F, Dorn C. Modified lateral block of the suprascapular nerve: a safe approach and how much to inject? A morphological study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;6:488-494.

Mallon WJ, Wilson RJ, Basamania MD. The association of supraescapular neuropathy with massive rotator cuff tears: a preliminary report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:395-398.

Warner JP, Krushell RJ, Masquelet A, Gerber C. Anatomy and relationships of the suprascapular nerve: anatomical constraints to mobilization of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles in the management of massive rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:36-45.

Pere P, Pitkänen M, Rosenberg PH. Effect of interscalene plexus block on diaphragmatic motion and on ventilatory function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1992;36:53-57.

Kempen PM, O'Donnel J, Lawler R, Mantha V. Acute respiratory insufficiency during interscalene plexus block. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1415-1416.

Rothe C, Asghar S, Andersen HL. Ultrasound-guided block of axillary nerve: a volunteer study of a new method. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011;55:565-570.

5dd436de0e88253151c63493 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections