Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942011000100002
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Anestesia regional para cesariana em gestantes obesas: estudo retrospectivo

Regional anesthesia for cesarean section in obese pregnant women: a retrospective study

Flávia Romano Rodrigues; Maria José Nascimento Brandão

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942011000100002 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.61, n1, p.17-20, 2011
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 0
Views: 1009

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O levantamento dos dados teve por objetivo identificar as técnicas anestésicas, suas dificuldades e complicações em pacientes com IMC > 30 kg.m-2 submetidas à cesariana. Este levantamento de dados justifica-se por embasar o desenvolvimento de novos protocolos e condutas mais adequadas a essa população de gestantes. MÉTODO: Estudo retrospectivo de levantamento de dados e complicações anestésicas em pacientes obesas, maiores de 18 anos, submetidas à cesariana no período de janeiro de 2004 a dezembro de 2006. As variáreis avaliadas foram: idade, peso, altura, IMC, estado físico (ASA), técnicas anestésicas, dificuldades na palpação e punção, complicações hemodinâmicas (sangramento e hipotensão) e complicações anestésicas. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliadas 315 fichas anestésicas. A média de idade foi de 29,1 anos, o IMC médio foi de 39,25 e a maioria das pacientes foi classificada como ASA II (63,2%). A técnica anestésica mais utilizada foi raquianestesia. Em 47 procedimentos, havia descrição de dificuldade de punção e, em 31 casos, dificuldade de palpação. CONCLUSÕES: As dificuldades técnicas encontradas foram mais acentuadas em pacientes de classes mais elevadas de obesidade, assim como hipotensão, sangramento e tempo cirúrgico.

Palavras-chave

ANESTESIA, Obstétrica, CIRURGIA, Obstétrica, DOENÇAS,Obesidade, TÉCNICAS ANESTÉSICAS, Regional, TÉCNICAS ANESTÉSICAS, Regional

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of the data gathering was to indentify anesthetic techniques, and their difficulties and complications in patients with BMI > 30 kg.m-2 undergoing cesarean sections. The study intends to support the development of new protocols and more adequate conducts for this population of pregnant women. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of data and anesthetic complications in obese patients older than 18 years of age who underwent cesarean sections from January 2004 to December 2006; variables investigated included: age, weight, height, BMI, physical status (ASA), anesthetic techniques, difficulties in palpation and puncturing, hemodynamic complications (bleeding and hypotension), and anesthetic complications. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifteen anesthetic forms were evaluated. Mean age was 29.1 years, mean BMI 39.25, and the majority of patients was classified as ASA II (63.2%). Spinal anesthesia charts used more often, difficulty to puncture was reported in 47 procedures, and difficulty to palpate was reported in 31 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Technical difficulties as well as hypotension, bleeding, and surgical time were more frequent in patients with higher degrees of obesity.

Keywords

Pregnancy, High-risk, Obesity, Morbid, Anesthesia, Spinal, Anesthesia, Epidural, Cesarean Section, Anesthesia Obstetrical

References

Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation. 2000.

Wolf M, Kettyle E, Sandler L. Obesity and preeclampsia: the potencial role of inflammation. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:757-762.

Kaufman I, Bondy R, Benjamin A. Peripartum cardiomyopathy and thromboembolism: anesthetic management and clinical course of an obese, diabetic patient. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:161-165.

Castro LC, Avina RL. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14:601-606.

Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D. Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate: a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1091-1097.

Nucci LB, Schmidt MI, Ducan BB. Nutritional status of pregnant women: prevalence and associated pregnancy outcomes. Rev Saúde Pública. 2001;35:502-507.

Schulzeck S, Gleim M, Palm S. Anasthesie zur Sectio caesarea bei Adipositas: Befunde einer vierjahrigen Beobachtung. Anaesthesist. 2003;52:787-794.

Saravanakumar K, Rao SG, Cooper GM. Obesity and obstetric anaesthesia. Anaethesia. 2006;61:36-48.

Andreasen KR, Andersen ML, Schantz AL. Obesity and pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:1022-1029.

Hood DD, Dewan DM. Anesthetic and obstetric outcome in morbidly obese parturients. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:1210-1218.

Perlow JH, Morgan MA. Massive maternal obesity and perioperative cesarean morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:560-565.

Bongain A, Isnard V, Gillet JY. Obesity in obstetrics and gynaecology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;77:217-228.

Guasch E, Ortega R, Gilsanz F. Analgesia epidural para parto em la gestante obesa. Rev Soc Esp Dolor. 2006;13:468-474.

Brockelsby J, Dresner M. Obesity and pregnancy. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2006;17:125-129.

5dd6d6310e88257a7f13f286 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections