Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942007000100004
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Artigo Científico

Efeitos do tratamento prévio com lidocaína, paracetamol e lidocaína-fentanil por via venosa na dor causada pela injeção de propofol: estudo comparativo

Effect of pretreatment with lidocaine, intravenous paracetamol and lidocaine-fentanyl on propofol injection pain: comparative study

Khaled M. El-Radaideh

Downloads: 0
Views: 977

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Foi realizado estudo duplamente encoberto, aleatório, para avaliar a eficácia do tratamento prévio, por via venosa, com lidocaína, paracetamol (Perfalgan®) ou lidocaína associada ao fentanil na redução da dor causada pela injeção de propofol. MÉTODOS: Imediatamente após a oclusão venosa com torniquete de borracha foi feita a administração venosa de 4 mL de lidocaína a 1% (Grupo L, n = 50), 4 mL de paracetamol (Perfalgan®) (40 mg) (Grupo R, n = 50), lidocaína a 2% associada a 100 µg de fentanil (Grupo LF, n = 50) ou 4 mL de solução fisiológica a 0,9% (Grupo P, n = 50; grupo-controle com placebo) a 200 adultos. A liberação da obstrução venosa foi feita após 60 segundos, sendo seguida da administração venosa de propofol, 2,5 mg.kg-1 a uma velocidade de 0,5 mg.s-1 através de cateter 20G inserido na veia do dorso da mão. A avaliação da dor foi feita durante a injeção de propofol. Ela incluiu movimentos da mão, expressão verbal espontânea de dor, caretas e gemidos durante a injeção de propofol. RESULTADOS: Lidocaína-fentanil (70% sem dor) e lidocaína (68% sem dor) foram mais eficazes na redução da dor causada pela injeção de propofol do que o paracetamol (54% sem dor) e o placebo (36% sem dor) (p < 0,05). A diferença na redução da incidência de dor causada pela injeção de propofol entre a lidocaína e lidocaína-fentanil não foi significativa. O paracetamol foi muito superior ao placebo (p < 0,05). CONCLUSÕES: O propofol é um anestésico amplamente utilizado. Lidocaína e lidocaína-fentanil administrados como tratamento prévio, na forma de retenção venosa durante 60 segundos, antes da administração do propofol reduziram de forma acentuada a dor causada pela injeção de propofol, enquanto o paracetamol (Perfalgan®) reduziu discretamente essa mesma dor.

Palavras-chave

ANESTÉSICOS, Venoso, COMPLICAÇÕES, dor à injeção

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Performed a randomized, double blind study to assess the efficacy of intravenous (IV) pretreatment with lidocaine, IV paracetamol (Perfalgan®) or lidocaine mixed with fentanyl in reducing propofol injection pain. METHODS: Immediately after venous occlusion with a rubber tourniquet on the patient's arm IV lidocaine 1% 4 mL (Group L, n = 50), IV paracetamol (Perfalgan®) 4 mL (40 mg) (Group R, n = 50), lidocaine 2% mixed with 100 µg fentanyl (Group LF, n = 50) or normal saline 4 mL (Group P, n = 50; as placebo control) was given to 200 adult patients. The release of the venous occlusion was done after 60s and followed by intravenous administration of propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1 at rate of 0.5 mg.s-1 through a 20G catheter inserted in hand dorsum vein. Pain assessment was made during the propofol injection. This included movement of hand, spontaneous verbal expressions of pain, frowning, and moaning during the injection of propofol. RESULTS: Lidocaine-fentanyl (70% pain free), and lidocaine (68% pain free) significantly reduced propofol injection pain more than paracetamol (54% pain free) and more than placebo (36% pain free) (p < 0.05). The difference in reducing the incidence of propofol injection pain between lidocaine and lidocaine-fentanyl did not reach statistical significance. There was a significant superiority of paracetamol compared to placebo (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Propofol, a commonly used anesthetic. Given as a venous retention pretreatment 60 seconds before propofol, lidocaine and lidocaine-fentanyl were found to significantly reduce the propofol injection pain, whereas IV paracetamol (Perfalgan®) slightly reduced the propofol injection pain.

Keywords

ANESTHETICS, Intravenous, COMPLICATIONS: pain on injection

Referências

Fletcher GC, Gillespie JA, Davidson JA. The effect of temperature upon pain during injection of propofol. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:498-499.

McCulloch MJ, Lees NW. Assessment and modification of pain on induction with propofol (Diprivan). Anaesthesia. 1985;40:1117-1120.

McCrirrick A, Hunter S. Pain of injection of propofol: the effect of injectate temperature. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:443-444.

Barker P, Langton JA, Murphy P. Effects of prior administration of cold saline on pain during propofol injection: A comparison with cold propofol and propofol with lignocaine. Anaesthesia. 1991;46:1069-1070.

Yokota S, Komatsu T, Komura Y. Pretreatment with topical 60% lidocaine tape reduces pain on injection of propofol. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:672- 674.

Overbaugh R, Jone P, Nguyen A. Effect of mixed versus unmixed lidocaine with propofol. Internet J Anesthesiol. 2003;7(2).

Lyons B, Lohan D, Flynn C. Modification of pain on injection of propofol: A comparison of pethidine and lignocaine. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:394-395.

Pang WW, Mok MS, Huang S. The analgesic effect of fentanyl, morphine, meperidine, and lidocaine in the peripheral veins: a comparative study. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:382- 386.

Mecklem DW. Propofol injection pain: comparing the addition of lignocaine or metoclopramide. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1994;22:568-570.

Wilkinson D, Anderson M, Gauntlett IS. Pain on injection of propofol: modification by nitroglycerin. Anesth Analg. 1993;77:1139-1142.

Nicol ME, Moriarty J, Edwards J. Modification of pain on injection of propofol - a comparison between lignocaine and procaine. Anaesthesia. 1991;46:67-69.

Eriksson M. Prilocaine reduces injection pain caused by propofol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39:210-213.

Smith AJ. Power I - The effect of pretreatment with ketorolac on pain during intravenous injection of propofol. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:883-885.

Huang YW, Buerkle H, Lee TH. Effect of pretreatment with ketorolac on propofol injection pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:1021-1024.

Schaub E, Kern C, Landau R. Pain on injection: a double-blind comparison of propofol with lidocaine pretreatment versus propofol formulated with long- and medium-chain triglycerides. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1699-1702.

Mangar D, Holak E. Tourniquet at 50 mmHg followed by intravenous lidocaine diminishes hand pain associated with propofol injection. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:250-252.

Scott RP, Saunders DA, Norman J. Propofol: clinical strategies for preventing the pain of injection. Anaesthesia. 1988;43:492-494.

Iwama H, Nakane M, Ohmori S. Nafamostat mesilate, a kallikrein inhibitor, prevents pain on injection with propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81:963-964.

Picard P, Tramer MR. Prevention of pain on injection with propofol: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:963-969.

Nyman Y, von Hofsten K, Georgiadi A. Propofol injection pain in children: a prospective randomized double-blind trial of a new propofol formulation versus propofol with added lidocaine. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:222-225.

Larsen B, Beerhalter U, Biedler A. Less pain on injection by a new formulation of propofol?: A comparison with propofol LCT. Anaesthesist. 2001;50:842-845.

Power I, Hons BSC, Brown DT. The effect of fentanyl, meperidine and diamorphine on nerve conduction in vitro. Reg Anesth. 1991;16:204-208.

Gissen AJ, Gugino LD, Datta S. Effects of fentanyl and sufentanil on peripheral mammalian nerves. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:1272-1276.

Editorial: IV paracetamol product launched. PJ online - Pharmaceut J. 2004;272:498.

5dd8470f0e8825516f13f287 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections