Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942006000400002
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Artigo Científico

Interação entre a analgesia de parto e o seu resultado: avaliação pelo peso e índice de Apgar do recém-nascido

The interaction between labor analgesia and its results: assessment using the newborn´s weight and Apgar score

Andrea Stolf Eberle; Eliana Marisa Ganem; Norma Sueli Pinheiro Módolo; Rosa Beatriz Amorim; Giane Nakamura; Christiane D'Oliveira Marques; Yara Marcondes Machado Castiglia

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942006000400002 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.56, n4, p.343-351, 2006
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 0
Views: 1119

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Existem controvérsias quanto à possibilidade de a analgesia de parto interferir no andamento do trabalho de parto e na vitalidade do recém-nascido. O objetivo deste estudo foi a interação entre analgesia do parto pelas técnicas peridural contínua e duplo bloqueio, com pequena dose de anestésico local, e o tipo de parto ocorrido, pela análise do peso e índice de Apgar do recém-nascido. MÉTODO: Analisaram-se, prospectivamente, os resultados de 168 analgesias de parto (janeiro de 2002 a janeiro de 2003), divididas em quatro grupos: G1 (n = 58) peridural contínua e evolução para parto vaginal; G2 (n = 69) duplo bloqueio e evolução para parto vaginal; G3 (n = 25) peridural contínua e evolução para cesariana; G4 (n = 16) duplo bloqueio e evolução para cesariana. Para G1 foi administrada ropivacaína a 0,125% (12 a 15 mL), para G2, bupivacaína a 0,5% (0,5 a 1 mL), sufentanil (10 mg), por via subaracnóidea. Administrou-se ropivacaína a 0,5%, por via peridural, para o parto vaginal (8 mL) e para cesariana (20 mL). Avaliaram-se idade, peso, altura, índice de massa corpórea (IMC), idade gestacional (IG), paridade e complicações (hipotensão arterial, bradicardia e hipóxia), e, do recém-nascido, peso e índice de Apgar (1º, 5º e 10º min). RESULTADOS: A maioria das parturientes era primigesta, com gestação de termo (uma IG de 28 semanas e nenhum pós-datismo), com peso, G2 < G4, e, IMC, G2 £ G4. Para o peso do RN, G1 < G3 e G2 < G4, e o Apgar do 1º min, G1 > G3. CONCLUSÕES: As técnicas de analgesia, peridural contínua e duplo bloqueio, com pequenas doses de anestésico local, não apresentaram interação com o resultado do parto, se a análise estiver focalizada no peso e no índice de Apgar do recém-nascido.

Palavras-chave

ANALGESIA, Parto, ANESTÉSICOS, Local, CIRURGIA, Obstétrica

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are controversies regarding whether labor analgesia can interfere with labor and the vitality of the newborn. The objective of this study was the interaction between labor analgesia, using the continuous epidural and combined spinal-epidural techniques with a small dose of local anesthetic, and the type of delivery analyzing the newborn's weight and Apgar score. METHODS: The results of 168 labor analgesias (from January 2002 to January 2003) were analyzed. They were divided in 4 groups: G1 (n = 58), continuous epidural and evolution to vaginal delivery; G2 (n = 69), combined spinal-epidural and evolution to vaginal delivery; G3 (n = 25), continuous epidural and evolution to cesarean; G4 (n = 16), combined spinal-epidural and evolution to cesarean. G1 received 0.125% ropivacaine (12 to 15 mL), G2 received subarachnoid 0.5% bupivacaine (0.5 to 1 mL) and sufentanil (10 mg). Epidural ropivacaine 0.5% for the vaginal delivery (8 mL) and for cesarean (20 mL). The patient's age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), gestational age, number of prior pregnancies, and complications (arterial hypotension, bradycardia, and hypoxia) and the newborn's weight and Apgar score (at 1, 5, and 10 minutes) were evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of pregnant women were primiparous and presented with a term pregnancy (one with gestational age of 28 weeks and none post-term pregnancy); weight, G2 < G4; and MBI, G2 £ G4. For the weight of the newborn, G1 < G3 and G2 < G4, and for the Apgar score at 1st minute, G1 > G3. CONCLUSIONS: If the analysis focuses the newborn's weight and Apgar score, the techniques of analgesia, continuous epidural and combined spinal-epidural with small doses of local anesthetic, do not interfere with the result of the delivery.

Keywords

ANALGESIA, Labor, ANESTHETICS, Local, SURGERY, Obstetric

Referências

Cheek GT, Gutsche BB. Epidural analgesia for labor and vaginal delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1987;30:515-529.

Thorp JA, Hu DH, Albin RM. The effect of intrapartum epidural analgesia on nulliparous labor: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:851-858.

Ramin SM, Gambling DR, Lucas MJ. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:783-789.

Lieberman E, Lang JM, Cohen A. Association of epidural analgesia with cesarean delivery in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;88:993-1000.

Philipsen T, Jensen NH. Epidural block or parenteral pethidine as analgesic in labour: a randomized study concerning progress in labour an instrumental deliveries. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1989;30:27-33.

Bofill JA, Vincent RD, Ross EL. Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:1465-1470.

Clark A, Carr D, Loyd G. The influence of epidural analgesia on cesarean delivery rates: a randomized, prospective clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:1527-1533.

Sharma SK, Sidawi JE, Ramin SM. Cesarean delivery: a randomized trial of epidural versus patient-controlled meperidine analgesia during labor. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:487-494.

Hess PE, Pratt SD, Soni AK. An association between severe labor pain and cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:881-886.

Wuitchik M, Bakal D, Lipshitz J. The clinical significance of pain and cognitive activity in latent labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73:35-42.

Nakamura G, Castiglia YMM, Nascimento Jr P. Bupivacaína, ropivacaína e levobupivacaína em analgesia e anestesia de parto. Repercussões materno-fetais. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2000;50:105 - 111.

Campbell DC, Zwack RM, Crone LA. Ambulatory labor epidural analgesia: bupivacaine versus ropivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1384-1389.

Curi PR. Metodologia e Análise da Pesquisa em Ciências Biológicas. 1998.

Rojansky N, Tanos V, Reubinoff B. Effect of epidural analgesia on duration and outcome of induced labor. Intern J Gynecol Obstet. 1997;56:237-244.

Kampe S, Tausch B, Paul M. Epidural block with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective caesarean section: maternal cardiovascular parameters, comfort and neonatal well-being. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20:27-12.

Thorngren-Jerneck K, Herbst A. Low 5-minute Apgar score: a population-based register study of 1 million births. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:65-70.

Golan A, Lin G, Evron S. Oligohydramnios: maternal complications and fetal outcome in 145 cases. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;37:91-95.

Ingemarsson I, Kallen K. Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76,761 postterm pregnancies in Sweden, 1982-1991: a register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;76:658-662.

5dd42a170e88251723c63498 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Eletrônico) 0104-0014 (Impresso)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 Todos os direitos reservados.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections