Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942005000200004
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Impacto da implantação de clínica de avaliação pré-operatória em indicadores de desempenho

Impact of preoperative outpatient evaluation clinic on performance indicators

Florentino Fernandes Mendes; Ligia Andrade da Silva Telles Mathias; Gastão Fernandes Duval Neto; Alan Rodrigues Birck

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942005000200004 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.55, n2, p.175-187, 2005
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 0
Views: 1010

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar os efeitos da implantação de Clínica de Avaliação Pré-Operatória Ambulatorial (APOA) em indicadores de desempenho do centro cirúrgico. MÉTODO: Durante cinco anos acompanhou-se, prospectivamente, o total de consultas APOA; o total de cirurgias realizadas; o total e os motivos de suspensão das cirurgias; as cirurgias realizadas em regime ambulatorial ou com o paciente internado; a taxa de suspensão das cirurgias e a média de permanência dos pacientes internados. Os motivos de suspensão das cirurgias foram divididos em causas médicas e administrativas. A taxa de suspensão foi apresentada em percentual, a média de permanência, em dias de permanência. Os demais indicadores foram apresentados como total. O estudo foi dividido em cinco períodos - Pré-APOA, APOA 1, 2, 3 e 4 - correspondendo, respectivamente, aos anos de 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 e 2002. Em cada ano, a variação percentual dos indicadores foi comparada com o ano anterior e com o Ano Pré-APOA. Para verificar as interações entre os indicadores, foram estabelecidas razões. RESULTADOS: A Clínica de APOA, exceto para o total de cirurgias realizadas, apresentou melhora de todos os indicadores acompanhados. Essa melhora foi menor no início, crescente e mais significativa no ano APOA4. Houve diminuição do número total de cirurgias suspensas, principalmente por causas administrativas, diminuição da taxa de suspensão de cirurgias e da média de permanência, sendo essa diminuição crescente e mais acentuada no ano APOA4. Existe correlação (r = 0,977) entre a taxa de suspensão de cirurgias e a média de permanência dos pacientes internados. CONCLUSÕES: Existem alterações significativas nos indicadores. A melhora é gradual e progressiva, à medida que se avança em anos em relação ao desenvolvimento da Clínica de APOA, e repercute na melhoria dos indicadores.

Palavras-chave

ANESTESIA, CIRURGIA, INDICADORES

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed at evaluating the effects of implementing a Preoperative Outpatient Evaluation Clinic (POEC) based on operating center performance indicators. METHODS: The following data were prospectively followed for five years: total POEC evaluations and surgeries performed; total and reasons for surgeries cancellation; inpatient or outpatient surgeries performed; procedures cancellation rate and mean hospital stay of admitted patients. Reasons for procedure cancellations were divided in medical and administrative reasons. Cancellation rate is presented in percentage. Mean hospital stay is presented in days. Other indicators are presented in total figures. The study was divided in five periods: Pre-POEC, POEC 1, 2, 3 and 4, corresponding, respectively, to the years of 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002. For each year, indicators percentage was compared to previous year and to the year Pre-POEC. Reasons were defined to check interactions among indicators. RESULTS: Except for total performed procedures, POEC has improved all tracked indicators. This improvement was low at the beginning and more significant in the year POEC 4. There has been decrease in the total number of cancelled procedures due to administrative reasons. There was also a decrease in procedures cancellation rate and mean hospital stay. These decreases were progressive and more marked in POEC 4. There is correlation (r = 0.977) between procedures cancellation rate and mean stay of admitted patients. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant changes in indicators. Improvement is gradual and progressive as years go by with regard to POEC development, and positively affects indicators improvement.

Keywords

ANESTHESIA, INDICATORS, SURGERY

Referências

Becker Jr KE. Cost containment in Anesthesiology. ASA - The American Society of Anesthesiologists. 1994;22:13-25.

Roizen MF, Foos JF, Fischer SP. Preoperative Evaluation. Anesthesia. 2000:824-883.

Fischer SP. Do preoperative clinic improve operating room efficiency?. Seminars in Anesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Pain. 1999;18:273-280.

François C. Public demand for grater safety: What solutions can be proposed?. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002;15:225-226.

Kley van W, Moons KGM, Rutten CLG. The effect of outpatient preoperative evaluation of hospital inpatients on cancellation of surgery and length of hospital stay. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:644-649.

Mathias LAST, Mathias RS. Avaliação pré-operatória: um fator de qualidade. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1997;47:335-349.

Pollard JB, Olson L. Early outpatient preoperative anesthesia assessment: Does it help to reduce operating room cancellations?. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:502-505.

Foss JF, Apfelbaum J. Economics of preoperative evaluation clinics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001;14:559-562.

Pollard JB, Garnerin P, Dalman RL. Use of outpatient preoperative evaluation to decrease length of stay for vascular surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:1307-1311.

Fischer SP. Cost-effective preoperative evaluation and testing. Chest. 1999;115(^ssuppl):96S-100S.

Fischer SP. Development and effectiveness of an anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic in a teaching hospital. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:196-206.

Gathe-Ghermay JC, Liu LL. Preoperative programs in Anesthesiology. Anesthesiol Clin N Am. 1999;17:335-353.

Pollard JB. Economic aspects of an anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2002;15:257-261.

Gibby GL. How preoperative assessment programs can be justified financially to hospital administrators. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2002;40:17-30.

Kopp VJ. Preoperative preparation: value, perspective, and practice in patient care. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2000;13:551-574.

Shah NK, Lim M, Tratloff T. Incidence and reasons for cancellation of cases in an ambulatory surgery center. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:A3.

Pollard JB, Zboray AL, Mazze RI. Economic benefits attributed to opening a preoperative evaluation clinic for outpatients. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:407-410.

Kluger MT, Tham EJ, Coleman NA. Inadequate pre-operative evaluation and preparation: a review of 197 reports from de Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:1173-1178.

Fleisher LA. Effect of perioperative evaluation and consultation on cost and outcome of surgical care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2000;13:209-213.

Hand R, Levin P, Stanziola A. The causes of canceled elective surgery. Qual Assur Utilization Rev. 1990;5:2-6.

Lingston JL, Harvey M, Kitchin N. Role of pre-admission clinics in a general surgical unit: a 6-month audit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1993;75:211-212.

Ngozi I, Chung F. Effect of return hospital visits on economics of ambulatory surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001;14:537-538.

Boothe P. Changing the admission process for elective surgery: An economic analysis. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:391-394.

Oliveira AR, Mendes FF, Oliveira M. Os clientes e a avaliação pré-operatória ambulatorial. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2003;53:83-88.

Kley van W. Optimizing the benefits of outpatient preoperative anesthesia evaluation. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:1461-1462.

Macario A, Vitez TS, Dunn B. Where are the costs in perioperative care?: Analysis of hospital costs and charges for inpatient surgical care. Anesthesiology. 1995;83:1138-1144.

Callegari J. Bioestatística: princípios e aplicações. 2003:256.

5dd7d2350e8825543913f286 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Eletrônico) 0104-0014 (Impresso)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 Todos os direitos reservados.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections