Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942004000500013
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Miscellaneous

Raquianestesia unilateral com baixa dose de bupivacaína a 0,5% hiperbárica

Unilateral spinal anesthesia with low 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine dose

Luiz Eduardo Imbelloni; Lúcia Beato; José Antônio Cordeiro

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942004000500013 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.54, n5, p.700-706, 2004
PDF Português
PDF English
Downloads: 1
Views: 1020

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: A raquianestesia unilateral pode apresentar vantagens, principalmente em pacientes ambulatoriais. Baixas doses da solução anestésica, agulhas ponta de lápis ou ponta cortante, lenta velocidade de injeção e a posição lateral têm sido relatados como facilitadores da produção de raquianestesia unilateral. O presente estudo longitudinal investiga o grau de raquianestesia unilateral utilizando 5 mg de bupivacaína a 0,5% hiperbárica injetada através de agulha 27G tipo Quincke no paciente em decúbito lateral, com membro a ser operado voltado para baixo. MÉTODO: Raquianestesia com bupivacaína a 0,5% foi realizada através da agulha 27G Quincke em 30 pacientes estado físico ASA I e II, submetidos à cirurgias ortopédicas. A punção subaracnóidea foi realizada com o paciente previamente colocado com o lado a ser operado voltado para baixo e foram injetados 5 mg de bupivacaína a 0,5% hiperbárica na velocidade de 1 ml.15s-1. Bloqueios sensitivo e motor (picada de agulha e escala de 0 a 3) foram comparados entre os lados a ser operado e o contralateral. RESULTADOS: Os bloqueios motor e sensitivo entre o lado operado e o contralateral foram significativamente diferentes em todos os momentos. Raquianestesia unilateral foi obtida em 85,7% dos pacientes. Estabilidade hemodinâmica foi observada em todos os pacientes. Nenhum paciente desenvolveu cefaléia pós-raquianestesia. CONCLUSÕES: Nas condições deste estudo a bupivacaína hiperbárica a 0,5% (5 mg) proporcionou um predominante bloqueio unilateral. Vinte minutos foram suficientes para a instalação do bloqueio. As principais vantagens da raquianestesia unilateral são a estabilidade hemodinâmica, a satisfação do paciente e recuperação mais rápida da anestesia.

Palavras-chave

ANESTÉSICOS, ANESTÉSICOS, TÉCNICAS ANESTÉSICAS, TÉCNICAS ANESTÉSICAS

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Unilateral spinal anesthesia may be advantageous, especially for outpatient procedures. Low anesthetic doses, pencil point or cutting point needles, slow injection rate and the lateral position have been reported as helping unilateral spinal anesthesia technique. This longitudinal study aimed at investigating the depth of unilateral spinal anesthesia with 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine injected with 27G Quincke needle with patients in the lateral position and limb to be operated on facing downward. METHODS: Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine and 27G Quincke needle was induced in 30 patients physical status ASA I-II submitted to orthopedic surgeries. Spinal puncture was performed with patients previously placed with the side to be operated on facing downward and 5 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine were injected at 1 mL.15s-1. Sensory and motor blocks (pinprick and 0 to 3 scores) were compared between operated and contralateral sides. RESULTS: Motor and sensory blocks between operated and contralateral sides were significantly different in all moments. Unilateral spinal anesthesia was obtained in 85.7% of patients. There has been hemodynamic stability in all patients. No patient has developed post dural puncture headache. CONCLUSIONS: In the conditions of our study, 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (5 mg) has provided predominantly unilateral block. Twenty minutes were enough for blockade installation. Major unilateral spinal anesthesia advantages are hemodynamic stability, patients’ satisfaction and faster anesthetic recovery.

Keywords

ANESTHETICS, ANESTHETICS, ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES

References

Imbelloni LE, Beato L, Gouveia MA. Unilateral spinal anesthesia with hypobaric bupivacaine. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2002;52:542-548.

Imbelloni LE, Beato L, Gouveia MA. A low hypobaric bupivacaine doses for unilateral spinal anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2003;53:579-585.

Imbelloni LE, Beato L, Gouveia MA. Low dose of isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2004;54:423-430.

Tanasichuk MA, Schultz EA, Matthews JH. Spinal hemianalgesia: an evaluation of a method, its applicability, and influence on the incidence of hypotension. Anesthesiology. 1961;22:74-85.

Casati A, Fanelli G, Cappelleri G. Low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45:850-854.

Lund PC, Rumbal AC. Hypobaric pontocaine spinal anesthesia: 1640 consecutives cases. Anesthesiology. 1947;8:181-199.

Gouveia MA, Labrunie GM. Raquianestesia hipobárica com tetracaína 0,1%. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1985;35:232-233.

Gouveia MA, Labrunie GM. Raquianestesia hipobárica com bupivacaína a 0,15%. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1985;35:519-521.

Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamaki KK, Pitkanen MT et al. Low-dose bupivacaine: a comparison of hypobaric and near isobaric solutions for arthroscopic surgery of the knee. Anaesthesia. 1999;54:540-545.

Lotz SMN, Crosgnac M, Katayama M. Anestesia subaracnóidea com bupivacaína a 0,5% hiperbárica: influência do tempo de permanência em decúbito lateral sobre a dispersão cefálica. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1992;42:257-264.

Pittoni G, Toffoletto F, Calcarella G. Spinal anesthesia in outpatient knee surgery: 22-gauge versus 25-gauge Sprotte needle. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:73-79.

Esmaoglu A, Boyaci A, Ersoy O. Unilateral spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42:1083-1087.

Iselin-Chaves IA, Van Gessel EF, Donald FA. The effects of solution concentration and epinephrine on lateral distribution of hyperbaric tetracaine spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:755-759.

Gouveia MA. Fatores que Controlam a Dispersão das Drogas na Raquianestesia. Tratado de Anestesia Raquidiana. 2001;7:67-73.

Povey HM, acobsen J, Westergaard-Nielsen J. Subarachnoid analgesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine: effect of a 60-minutes period of sitting. Acta Anaesthestiol Scand. 1989;33:295-297.

Kuusniemi KS, Pihlajamaki KK, Pitkanen MT. A low dose of plain or hyperbaric bupivacaine for unilateral spinal anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:605-610.

Kim KC, Moneta MD. Unilateral spinal anesthesia can be obtained with low dose bupivacaine. Anesthesiology. 1992;77(^s3A):A803.

Imbelloni LE, Carneiro ANG, Sobral MGC. Tempo de gotejamento de líquido cefalorraquidiano com agulhas espinhais tipo Quincke. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1995;45:155-158.

Imbelloni LE, Sobral MGC, Carneiro ANG. Cefaléia pós-raquianestesia e o desenho das agulhas. Experiência com 5050 casos. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2001;51:43-52.

Enk D, Ott B, Meyer J. Influence of injection speed on the incidence of strictly unilateral spinal anesthesia using a 27G Whitacre needle. Anesthesiology. 1995;83(3A):A775.

Meyer J, Enk D, Penner M. Unilateral spinal using low-flow injection through a 29-gauge Quincke needle. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:1188-1191.

Casati A, Fanelli G, Aldegheri G. Frequency of hypotension during conventional or asymmetric hyperbaric spinal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:214-219.

Fanelli G, Borghi B, Casati A. Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:746-751.

Beardsley D, Holman S, Gant R. Transient neurologic deficit after spinal anesthesia: local anesthetic maldistribution with pencil point needles?. Anesth Analg. 1995;81:314-32.

Casati A, Fanelli G, Cappelleri G. Does speed of intrathecal injection affect the distribution of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine?. Br J Anesth. 1998;81:355-357.

5dd6e5a90e8825293d13f287 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections