Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942003000400002
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Artigo Científico

Efeitos da associação entre pequenas doses subaracnóideas de morfina e cetoprofeno venoso e oral em pacientes submetidas à cesariana

Effects of low spinal morphine doses associated to intravenous and oral ketoprofen in patients submitted to cesarean sections

Eliana Marisa Ganem; Norma Sueli Pinheiro Módolo; Fábio Ferrari; Francisco Carlos Obata Cordon; Edgar Shiguero Koguti; Yara Marcondes Machado Castiglia

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942003000400002 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.53, n4, p.431-439, 2003
PDF
Downloads: 0
Views: 1085

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Pequenas doses subaracnóideas de morfina são eficazes em reduzir a dor pós-operatória de pacientes submetidas à cesariana, com menor incidência de efeitos colaterais. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar a qualidade da analgesia pós-operatória e a ocorrência de efeitos colaterais em pacientes submetidas a cesarianas, sob anestesia subaracnóidea com bupivacaína hiperbárica e morfina nas doses de 0,05 mg e 0,1 mg, associadas ao cetoprofeno pelas vias venosa e oral. MÉTODO: Participaram do estudo 60 gestantes de termo, estado físico ASA I e II, que foram submetidas à cesariana eletiva. As pacientes foram divididas em dois grupos: grupo 1 - morfina 0,1 mg, grupo 2 - 0,05 mg, associada a 15 mg de bupivacaína hiperbárica. Todas receberam cetoprofeno (100 mg) por via venosa no per-operatório e por via oral a cada 8 horas no primeiro dia de pós-operatório. As pacientes foram avaliadas 6, 12 e 24 horas após o término da cirurgia, com relação à intensidade da dor e presença de efeitos colaterais (sedação, prurido, náusea e vômito). A presença destes últimos também foi avaliada no per-operatório. RESULTADOS: Ambos os grupos foram idênticos quanto aos dados antropométricos e à duração da cirurgia e da anestesia. Também foram homogêneos com relação à intensidade da dor pós-operatória e à presença de prurido, sedação, náusea e vômito. CONCLUSÕES: A morfina, nas doses de 0,05 mg e 0,1 mg administradas no espaço subaracnóideo, associada ao cetoprofeno pelas vias venosa e oral, apresentou a mesma qualidade de analgesia pós-operatória e determinou a mesma ocorrência de efeitos colaterais.

Palavras-chave

ANALGÉSICOS, ANALGÉSICOS, ANALGÉSICOS, ANALGÉSICOS, CIRURGIA, CIRURGIA, TÉCNICAS ANESTÉSICAS, TÉCNICAS ANESTÉSICAS

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Low spinal morphine doses are effective in relieving postoperative pain of patients submitted to Cesarean sections, with low incidence of side-effects. This study aimed at evaluating postoperative analgesia and the incidence of side-effects in patients submitted to Cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and 0.05 mg and 0.1 mg morphine associated to intravenous and oral ketoprofen. METHODS: Sixty pregnant women, physical status ASA I and II, undergoing elective Cesarean sections, were divided in two groups: group 1 patients were given 0.1 mg spinal morphine, while group 2 received 0.05 mg morphine, both associated to 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. All patients received perioperative 100 mg intravenous ketoprofen and oral ketoprofen at 8-hour intervals in the first postoperative day. Patients were assessed at 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery for pain intensity and side-effects (sedation, pruritus, nausea and vomiting). Side-effects were also evaluated in the perioperative period. RESULTS: Both groups were similar in demographics and surgery and anesthesia duration. They were also homogeneous in postoperative pain intensity and presence of pruritus, sedation, nausea and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal 0.05 mg and 0.1 mg morphine associated to intravenous and oral ketoprofen have provided the same postoperative analgesia and have determined the same incidence of side-effects.

Keywords

ANALGESICS, ANALGESICS, ANALGESICS, ANALGESICS, ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, SURGERY, SURGERY

Referências

Schnider SM, Levinson G. Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. Anesthesia for Obstetrics. 1993:211-239.

Bhavani-Shankar . Anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Probl in Anesth. 1999;3:333-343.

Cohe S. Strategies for labor pain relief - past, present and future. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997:17-21.

Palmer CM, Voulgaropoulos D, Alvens D. Subarachnoid fentanyl augments lidocaine spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Reg Anesth. 1995;20:389-394.

Sibilla C, Albertazzi P, Zateli R. Pain relief after caesarean section: comparison of different techniques of morphine administration. Int J Obstet Anaesth. 1994;3:203-207.

Stoelting RK. Opioid Agonists and Antagonists. Pharmacology and Physiology in Anesthetic Practice. 1999:77-112.

Dahl JB, Jeppesen IS, Jorgensen H. Intraoperative and postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of intrathecal opioids in patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1919-1927.

Palmer CM, Emerson S, Volgoropolous D. Dose-response relationship of intrathecal morphine for post-cesarean analgesia. Anesthesiology. 1999;90:437-444.

Milner AR, Bogod DG, Harwood RJ. Intrathecal administration of morphine for elective caesarean section: A comparison between 0.1 mg and 0.2 mg. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:871-873.

Swart M, Swell J, Thomas D. Intrathecal morphine for caesarean section: an assessment of pain relief, satisfaction an side-effects. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:364-381.

Souter AJ, Fredman B, White PF. Controversies in the preoperative use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:1178-1190.

Luthman J, Kay NH, White JB. The morphine sparing effects of diclofenac sodium following cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1994;3:82-86.

Cardoso MMSC, Carvalho JCA, Amaro AR. Small doses of intrathecal morphine combined with systemic diclofenac for postoperative pain control after cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:538-541.

Yaksh TL, Wilson PR, Kaikorf . Analgesia produced by a spinal action of morphine and effects upon parturition in the rat. Anesthesiology. 1979;51:386-392.

Pavy TJ, Gambling DR, Merrick PM. Rectal indomethacin potentiates morphine analgesia after caesarean delivery. Anaesth Int Care. 1995;23:555-559.

Cohen SE, Desai JB, Ratner EF. Ketorolac and spinal morphine for postcesarean analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1996;5:14-18.

Chadwick HS, Ready LB. Intrathecal and epidural morphine sulfate for postcesarean analgesia a clinical comparison. Anesthesiology. 1988;68:925-929.

Uchiyama A, Ueyama H, Nakano S. Low dose intrathecal morphine and pain relief following caesarean section. Int J Obst Anesth. 1994;3:87-91.

Slappendel R, Weber EWG, Benraad B. Itching after intrathecal morphine: Incidence and treatment. Eur J Anaesth. 2000;17:616-621.

Fuller JG, McMorland GH, Douglas MJ. Epidural morphine for analgesia after caesarean section: a report of 4880 patients. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37:636-640.

Bromage PR. The price of intraspinal narcotic analgesia: basic constraints. Anesth Analg. 1981;60:461-463.

Warwick JP, Keearns CF, Scott WE. The effect of subhypnotic doses of propofol on the incidence of pruritus after intrathecal morphine for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 1997;52:265-275.

Krause L, Shuster S. Mechanism of action of antipruritic drugs. BMJ. 1983;287:1199-1200.

Yang T, Breen TW, Archer D. Comparison of 0. 25 mg and 0.1 mg intrathecal morphine for analgesia after cesarean and section. Can J Anaesth. 1999;46:856-860.

5ddd31070e882501731da3ea rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Eletrônico) 0104-0014 (Impresso)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 Todos os direitos reservados.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections