Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1590/S0034-70942003000100010
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Miscellaneous

Considerações sobre analgesia controlada pelo paciente em hospital universitário

Patient controlled analgesia in a university hospital

Guilherme Antônio Moreira de Barros; Lino Lemonica

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942003000100010 Braz J Anesthesiol, vol.53, n1, p.69-82, 2003
PDF
Downloads: 0
Views: 1030

Resumo

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O rápido progresso obtido nas técnicas cirúrgicas e anestésicas nos últimos anos proporcionou extraordinário aumento das indicações de procedimentos invasivos. Por outro lado, com o envelhecimento da população, o período de recuperação pós-operatória passou a ser motivo de maior preocupação da equipe de saúde. Para tanto, novas técnicas de analgesia foram criadas e desenvolvidas e, dentre elas, destaca-se a Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente (ACP). Em nosso país, o Serviço de Dor Aguda (SEDA) da Disciplina de Terapia Antálgica e Cuidados Paliativos, do Departamento de Anestesiologia da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - UNESP, utiliza há muitos anos esta técnica de analgesia. Com a finalidade de atestar a qualidade do serviço prestado, a pesquisa objetiva verificar a eficácia e segurança do método, assim como identificar e caracterizar a população atendida. MÉTODO: De modo retrospectivo, foram avaliados 679 pacientes tratados pelo SEDA, exclusivamente com o método de ACP, durante três anos. Os pacientes foram incluídos na análise aleatoriamente, sem restrições quanto à idade, ao sexo, ao tipo de cirurgia e considerando-se unicamente a possibilidade de indicação da ACP. Foram estudados os seguintes atributos: sexo, idade, tipo de cirurgia, intensidade da dor, dias de acompanhamento, analgésicos utilizados, vias de administração, ocorrência de efeitos colaterais e complicações da técnica. RESULTADOS: 3,96% dos pacientes submetidos a cirurgias e 1,64% dos internados no período observado foram acompanhados com técnica ACP. A cirurgia torácica foi a mais freqüentemente atendida, com 25% dos pacientes. A morfina foi o medicamento mais utilizado (54,2%), sendo a via peridural a preferencial (49,5%). A escala numérica verbal média foi de 0,8 (0-10). Os efeitos colaterais ocorreram em 22,4% dos doentes tratados. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados foram considerados excelentes quanto à qualidade da analgesia, embora com ocorrência de efeitos colaterais indesejáveis, tendo havido boa aceitação da técnica de analgesia pelas clínicas atendidas.

Palavras-chave

ANALGESIA, ANALGESIA, DOR

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The rapid development seen in recent years in surgical and anesthetic techniques allowed for an increased indication of invasive procedures. At the same time, with the aging of the population, the postoperative recovery period became the focus of major concern for the healthcare team. For such, new analgesic techniques were developed, among them, Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA). In Brazil, the Acute Pain Service (SEDA) of the Anesthesiology Department, Botucatu Medical School - UNESP, has been using PCA for many years. Aiming at verifying the quality of the service provided, this research has evaluated the efficacy and safety of the technique, in addition to identifying and characterizing patients submitted to PCA. METHODS: Participated in this retrospective study 679 patients treated by SEDA with the PCA method only, during a 3-year period. Patients were randomly included in the study with no restrictions concerning age, gender and type of surgery, considering only the possibility of PCA. The following parameters were evaluated: gender, age, type of surgery, pain score, treatment duration, analgesic drugs used, administration route, side effects and complications. RESULTS: The PCA technique was used in 3.96% of patients submitted to surgical procedures and in 1.64% of all hospitalized patients. Thoracic surgeries were the most frequent procedures and accounted for 25% of patients. Morphine was the most commonly used analgesics (54.2%) and the epidural route was the most frequent route of administration. Mean verbal numeric scale was 0.8 (0-10), and side effects were present in 22.4% of treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results were considered excellent in terms of quality of analgesia, although with the incidence of some side effects. The PCA technique was widely accepted by the medical specialties of the hospital.

Keywords

ANALGESIA, ANALGESIA, PAIN

References

Jayr C. Repercussion of postoperative pain, benefits attending to treatment. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1998;17:540-554.

Rawal N. Analgesia technique and post-operative morbidity. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1995:47-52.

Sinatra RS. Current methods of controlling post-operative pain. Yale J Biol Med. 1991;64:351-374.

Moon MR, Luchette FA, Gibson SW. Prospective, randomized comparison of epidural versus parenteral opioid analgesia in thoracic trauma. Ann Surg. 1999;229:684-692.

Lavandhomme P, Kock M. Practical guidelines on the postoperative use of patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 1998;13:9-16.

Mcleod GA, Davies HT, Colvin JR. Shaping attitudes to postoperative pain relief: the role of the acute pain team. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995;10:30-34.

Ready LB, Edwards WT. Adult Postoperative Pain. Management of Acute Pain. 1992:22-25.

Scherperell P. Patient controlled analgesia. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1991;10:169-283.

Rawal N. 10 years of acute pain services-achievements and challenges. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:68-73.

Stacey BR, Rudy TE, Nethaus D. Management of patient-controlled analgesia: a comparison of primary surgeons and a dedicated pain service. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:130-134.

Tsui SL, Lo RJ, Tong WN. A clinical audit for postoperative pain control on 1443 surgical patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1995;33:37-48.

Rawal N, Berggren L. Organization of acute pain services: a low-cost model. Pain. 1994;57:117-123.

Kwan JW. Use of infusion devices for epidural or intrathecal administration of spinal opioids. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990;47:S18-23.

Rosenberg M. Patient-controlled analgesia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:386-389.

Schug SA, Torrie JJ. Safety assessment of postoperative pain management by an acute pain service. Pain. 1993;55:387-391.

Upton RN, Semple TT, Macintyre PE. Pharmacokinetic optimization of opioid treatment in acute pain therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997;33:225-244.

Owen H, White PF. Patient-Controlled Analgesia: An Overview. Acute Pain: Mechanisms & Management. 1992:151-164.

Silverman DG, Preble LM, Paige D. Basal infusion as supplement to PCA in orthopedic patients. Anesth Analg. 1990;72:S256.

Sinatra R, Chung KS, Silverman DG. An evaluation of morphine and oxymorphine administered by a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) or PCA + basal infusion in post cesarean delivery patients. Anesthesiology. 1989;71:502-507.

Finnegan RF, Linem J, Austin JE. Patient-controlled analgesia: the comparison of pain control and patient satisfaction and side-effects in intra-abdominal surgery. Pain. 1990;5:S148.

Owen H, Reekie RM, Clements JA. Analgesia from morphine and ketamine: a comparison of infusions of morphine an ketamine for postoperative analgesia. Anaesthesia. 1987;42:151-156.

Owen H, Szekely SM, Plummer JL. Variables of patient-controlled analgesia, 2: Concurrent infusion. Anaesthesia. 1989;44:11-13.

Parker RK, Holtmann B, White PF. Patient-controlled analgesia: failure of opioid infusion to improve pain management after surgery. JAMA. 1991;266:1947-1952.

Vinik HR, Hammonds W, Len A. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) combined with continuous infusion. Anesth Analg. 1990;70:S418.

Wu MYC, Purcell GJ. Patient-controlled analgesia: the value of a background infusion. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1990;18:575-576.

Meuret G, Jocham H. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the domiciliary care of tumor patients. Cancer Treat Rev. 1996;22(^sA):137-140.

McGrath PA. Pain Assessment in Children: A Practical Approach. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy: Pediatric Pain. 1990:5-30.

Preble LM, Guveyan JA, Sinatra RS. Patient Characteristics Influencing Postoperative Pain Management. Acute Pain: Mechanisms and Management. 1992:140-150.

Holritz K, Lucas A. Implementation of an anesthesia pain management service program. Cancer Pract. 1993;1:129-136.

Lehmann KA. Modifiers of patient-controlled analgesia efficacy in acute and chronic pain. Curr Rev Pain. 1999;3:447-452.

Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH. A phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain. 2000;87:33-41.

Yoshida WB, Maffei FHA. O Papel da Simpatectomia nas Arteriopatias Isquêmicas. Doenças Vasculares Periféricas. 1985:187-193.

Angst MS, Ramaswamy B, Riley ET. Lumbar epidural morphine in humans and supraspinal analgesia do experimental heat pain. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:312-324.

Chauvin M, Samii K, Schermann JM. Plasma concentration of morphine after IM, extradural and intrathecal administration. Br J Anaesth. 1981;53:991-993.

Chauvin M, Samii K, Schermann JM. Plasma pharmacokinetics of morphine after IM, extradural and intrathecal administration. Br J Anaesth. 1982;54:843-847.

Lauretti GR, Mattos AL, Lima IC. Tramadol and beta- cyclodextrin piroxican: effective multinodal balanced analgesia for the intra and postoperative period. Reg Anesth. 1997;22:243-248.

Fischer RL, Lubenow TR, Liceaga A. A comparison of continuous epidural infusion of fentanyl-bupivacaine and morphine-bupivacaine in management of post-operative pain. Anesth Analg. 1988;67:559-563.

Greeg RV, Denson DD, Knarr DC. Continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine and morphine vs. systemic narcotic analgesics for post-operative pain relief. Anesthesiology. 1988;69:A384.

Omoigui S. The Pain Drugs Handbook. 1995:271-278.

Blanco J, Blanco E, Rodriguez G. One year's experience with an acute pain service in a Spanish University Clinic hospital. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1994;11:417-421.

Jensen TS. Mechanisms of Neuropathic Pain. Pain 1996: An Updated Review. Refresher Course Syllabus. 1996:77-86.

Tanaka PP. Estudo comparativo entre o modelo de analgesia com morfina controlada pelo paciente e com cetoprofeno e dipirona no pós-operatório de colecistectomia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 1998;48:191-197.

Lutti MN, Simoni RF, Cangiani LM. Analgesia controlada pelo paciente com morfina ou fentanil no pós-operatório de reconstrução de ligamentos do joelho: estudo comparativo. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2000;50:8-13.

Valverde Fº J, Ruiz-Neto PP, Freire RCMC. Análise descritiva de serviço de dor aguda pós-operatória em hospital terciário. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2000;50:386-390.

Lutti MN, Vieira JL, Eickhoff DR. Analgesia controlada pelo paciente com fentanil e sufentanil no pós-operatório de reconstrução de ligamentos do joelho: estudo comparativo. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2002;52:166-174.

5ddd3ca30e8825801e1da3e9 rba Articles
Links & Downloads
2352-2291 (Electronic) 0104-0014 (Printed)
Braz J Anesthesiol ©2024 All rights reserved.

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections