Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844719
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Systematic Review

Perioperative tranexamic acid in burn surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Ácido tranexâmico perioperatório em cirurgia de queimados: revisão sistemática e metanálise de ensaios clínicos randomizados  

Maria Eduarda Molinari, Ramon Huntermann, Julia C. Bernardi, Nicoly Fiorese Andrade, Gustavo Barbosa David, Nicolas Ramos, Caroline de Oliveira Fischer Bacca

Downloads: 0
Views: 22

Abstract

Background

Burn injuries often require surgery, posing challenges due to significant intraoperative blood loss and transfusion risks. Tranexamic Acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, stabilizes clots and reduces fibrinolysis, with proven efficacy in various surgical settings. However, the benefits in burn patients are yet to be established.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) comparing TXA versus control in burned patients. Risk Ratios (RR) and Mean Differences (MD) with 95% CIs were computed for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. The primary endpoint of interest was blood loss. Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio software (version 4.2.2). The certainty of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Results

Four RCTs comprising 204 patients were included, with 102 (50%) assigned to the TXA group. The mean patient age across studies ranged from 32.15 to 39.70 years. TXA significantly reduced total blood loss (MD = -183.93 mL; 95% CI: -278.44 to -89.42; p < 0.01), need for packed red blood cell transfusions (RR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.66; p < 0.01), while also improving hematocrit (MD = 3.49%; 95% CI: 1.58 to 5.41; p < 0.01) and hemoglobin levels (MD = 0.87 g.dL-1; 95% CI: 0.35 to 1.39; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

In patients with burns, TXA was associated with reduced blood loss and packed cell transfusions. However, certainty is limited by the small number and heterogeneity of available trials.

Registration

PROSPERO ID: CRD420251000356. Registered on 07 March 2025.

Keywords

Antifibrinolytic; Blood loss; Burn patients; Burn surgeries; Tranexamic acid

Resumo

Introdução

Lesões por queimadura frequentemente requerem intervenção cirúrgica, apresentando desafios devido à significativa perda sanguínea intraoperatória e ao risco de transfusão. O ácido tranexâmico (TXA), um agente antifibrinolítico, estabiliza coágulos e reduz a fibrinólise, com eficácia comprovada em diversos contextos cirúrgicos. No entanto, seus benefícios em pacientes queimados ainda não estão estabelecidos.

Methods

Foi realizada uma revisão sistemática e metanálise. As bases PubMed, Embase e Cochrane foram pesquisadas em busca de Ensaios Clínicos Randomizados (ECRs) que comparassem TXA versus controle em pacientes queimados. Razões de risco (RR) e diferenças de médias (DM) com IC de 95% foram calculadas para desfechos binários e contínuos, respectivamente. O desfecho primário de interesse foi a perda sanguínea. As análises estatísticas foram realizadas utilizando o software RStudio (versão 4.2.2). A certeza da evidência foi avaliada pelo método GRADE.

Resultados

Foram incluídos quatro ECRs, totalizando 204 pacientes, dos quais 102 (50%) foram alocados no grupo TXA. A idade média dos pacientes entre os estudos variou de 32,15 a 39,70 anos. O TXA reduziu significativamente a perda sanguínea total (DM = -183,93 mL; IC 95%: -278,44 a -89,42; p < 0,01), a necessidade de transfusão de concentrado de hemácias (RR = 0,42; IC 95%: 0,26 a 0,66; p < 0,01), além de melhorar o hematócrito (DM = 3,49%; IC 95%: 1,58 a 5,41; p < 0,01) e os níveis de hemoglobina (DM = 0,87 g.dL⁻¹; IC 95%: 0,35 a 1,39; p < 0,01).

Conclusão

Em pacientes queimados, o uso de TXA esteve associado à redução da perda sanguínea e da necessidade de transfusão de concentrado de hemácias. No entanto, a certeza das evidências é limitada pelo pequeno número e pela heterogeneidade dos estudos disponíveis.

Registro

PROSPERO ID: CRD420251000356. Registrado em 07 de março de 2025.

Palavras-chave

Antifibrinolítico; Perda sanguínea; Pacientes queimados; Cirurgias de queimados; Ácido tranexâmico  

Referencias

1. Sterling JP, Heimbach DM. Hemostasis in burn surgery ‒ A review. Burns. 2011;37:559−65.

2. Luo G, Fan H, Sun W, et al. Blood loss during extensive escharectomy and auto-microskin grafting in adult male major burn patients. Burns. 2011;37:790−3.

3. Farny B, Fontaine M, Latarjet J, Poupelin JC, Voulliaume D, Ravat F. Estimation of blood loss during adult burn surgery. Burns. 2018;44:1496−501.

4. Palmieri TL, Caruso DM, Foster KN, et al. Effect of blood transfusion on outcome after major burn injury: A multicenter study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1602−7.

5. Marik PE, Corwin HL. Efficacy of red blood cell transfusion in the critically ill: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:2667−74.

6. Cartotto R, Musgrave MA, Beveridge M, Fish J, Gomez AM. Minimizing Blood Loss in Burn Surgery. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2000;49:1034−9.

7. Cai J, Ribkoff J, Olson S, Raghunathan V, Al-Samkari H, DeLoughery TG, et al. The many roles of tranexamic acid: An overview of the clinical indications for TXA in medical and surgical patients. Eur J Haematol. 2020;104:79−87.

8. Ker K, Prieto-Merino D, Roberts I. Systematic review, metaanalysis and meta-regression of the effect of tranexamic acid on surgical blood loss. Br J Surg [Internet]. 2013;100:1271−9.

9. Heyns M, Knight P, Steve AK, Yeung JK. A Single Preoperative Dose of Tranexamic Acid Reduces Perioperative Blood Loss: A Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2021;273:75−81.

10. Tapking C, Hundeshagen G, Kirchner M, Fischer S, Kneser U, Bliesener B. Tranexamic acid reduced blood transfusions in acute burn surgery: A retrospective case-controlled trial. Burns. 2022;48:522−8.

11. Domínguez A, Alsina E, Landín L, García-Miguel JF, Casado C, Gilsanz F. Transfusion requirements in burn patients undergoing primary wound excision: effect of tranexamic acid. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83:353−60.

12. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane, 2022. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

13. Sterne JAC, Savovic J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

14. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Statistics Medicine. 2002;21:1539−58.

15. The Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) [computer program]. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University Hospital − Rigshospitalet; 2021. Available from: https://ctu.dk/tsa/downloads/.

16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:71.

17. Ajai KS, Kumar P, Subair M, Sharma RK. Effect of single dose intravenous tranexamic acid on blood loss in tangential excision of burn wounds ‒ A double blind randomised controlled trial. Burns. 2022;48:1311−8.

18. Bhatia N, Sen I, Kumari K, Kumar P, Bharti N. Impact of single dose intravenous tranexamic acid on peri-operative blood transfusion requirements in burn patients: A prospective, randomized trial. Egypt J Anaesth. 2017;33:251−5.

19. Castillo-Cardiel G, Avalos-Lopez M, M  endez-Miranda C, et al.  Comparative efficacy of tranexamic acid versus placebo on hemostatic outcomes after the surgical debridement of burn patients: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Burns. 2025;51:107339.

20. Naderi MA, Moghadam AD, Mobayen M, et al. Effects of intravenous tranexamic acid on bleeding during burn surgery: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Burns. 2025;51:107270.

21. Roberts I, Shakur H, Coats T, et al. The CRASH-2 trial: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of the effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events and transfusion requirement in bleeding trauma patients. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17:1−79.

22. McCormack PL. Tranexamic Acid: A Review of its Use in the Treatment of Hyperfibrinolysis. Drugs. 2012;72:585−617.

23. Franchini M, Focosi D, Mannucci PM. Tranexamic Acid: An Evergreen Hemostatic Agent. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2024;50:733−8.

24. Prudovsky I, Kacer D, Zucco VV, et al. Tranexamic acid: Beyond antifibrinolysis. Transfusion (Paris). 2022;62(Suppl 1):S301−12.

25. Fijany AJ, Givechian KB, Zago I, et al. Tranexamic acid in burn surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns. 2023;49:1249−59.

26. Slob J, Gigengack RK, Van Baar ME, Loer SA, Koopman SSHA, Van Der Vlies CH. Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in burn patients undergoing surgery − a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024;24:91.

27. Ma H, Li S, Dou R, et al. Impact of red blood cell transfusion and hemoglobin threshold on 1-year mortality among surgical sepsis survivors: A propensity score matching study. Am J Surg. 2024;237:115790.

28. Wedel C, Møller CM, Budtz-Lilly J, Eldrup N. Red blood cell transfusion associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Yeh CC, editor Plos One. 2019;14:e0219263.

29. Udy AA, Roberts JA, Lipman J, Blot S. The effects of major burn related pathophysiological changes on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drug use: An appraisal utilizing antibiotics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2018;123:65−74.

30. Greenhalgh DG. Management of Burns Longo DL, editor N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2349−59.

31. Wang J, Wang CZ, Salsbury JR, et al. Thermal injury induces early blood vessel occlusion in a porcine model of brass comb burn. Sci Rep. 2021;11:12457.

32. Karadjoff A, Liberati DM, Diebel LN. Tranexamic acid impact on platelet adhesion to the endothelium after shock conditions: A protective effect? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025;98:713−9.

33. Guerriero C, Cairns J, Perel P, Shakur H, Roberts I. on behalf of CRASH 2 trial collaborators. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Administering Tranexamic Acid to Bleeding Trauma Patients Using Evidence from the CRASH-2 Trial Eltzschig HK, editor PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e18987.

34. Hubble MW, Renkiewicz GK, Schiro S, Van Vleet L, Houston S. Estimated Cost-Effectiveness of Implementing a Statewide Tranexamic Acid Protocol for the Management of Suspected Hemorrhage in the Prehospital Setting. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27:366−74.

35. Johansson T, Pettersson L, Lisander B. Tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty saves blood and money: A randomized, doubleblind study in 100 patients. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:314−9.

36. Haase DR, Kimbrel B, Bombardier B, Templeton KJ, Rosenthal HG, Sweeney KR. Tranexamic Acid in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Endoprosthetic Reconstruction: A Cost Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29:961−9.

37. Karanicolas PJ, Lin Y, McCluskey SA, et al. Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Liver Resection: The HeLiX Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2024;332:1080.

38. Schaller C, Petitpierre A, Von Felten S, et al. Thromboembolic events in burn patients: An analysis of risk factors and different anticoagulants. Burns. 2024;50:569−77.

39. Li N, Tan J, Feng X, Li M, Qin L, Zhou J. Early coagulation disorder and the predictive value of D-dimer for deep vein thrombosis in major burn patients. Burns. 2025;51:107398.


Submitted date:
16/07/2025

Accepted date:
16/12/2025

69f24a46a953954695047062 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections