Comparison of anesthesia management in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a retrospective cohort study
Comparação do manejo da anestesia no implante de válvula aórtica transcateter: um estudo de coorte retrospectivo
Gönül Erkan, Buket Ozyaprak, Ferdane Aydoğdu Kaya, Ihsan Dursun, Levent Korkmaz
Abstract
Background and objectives
We aimed to investigate the effects of two different anesthetic techniques in our patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
Methods
In this study, 303 patients who underwent TAVI procedure with a diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided according to the type of anesthesia given during each procedure as; general anesthesia (GA), local anesthesia (LA).
Results
LA was preferred in 245 (80.8%) of 303 patients who underwent TAVI, while GA was preferred in 58 patients (19.1%). Median ages of our patients who received LA and GA were 83 and 84, respectively. The procedure and anesthesia durations of the patients in the GA group were longer than the LA group (p< 0.00001, p < 0.00001, respectively). Demographic and pre-operative clinical data were similar in comparison between two groups (p > 0.05) except for peripheral artery disease. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity in both groups. While the number of inotrope use was significantly higher in patients who received GA (p < 0.00001), no significant differences were found between LA and GA patients in terms of major complications and mortality (p > 0.05). Intensive care and hospital stays were significantly shorter in the LA group (p = 0.001, p = 0.023, respectively).
Conclusion
The anesthetic technique of TAVI procedure did not have a significant effect on outcomes including; complications, mortality and success of the procedure. LA provides shorter duration of procedure and hospital stay.
Keywords
Resumo
Justificativa e objetivos: Nosso objetivo foi investigar os efeitos de duas técnicas anestésicas diferentes em nossos pacientes submetidos ao implante de válvula aórtica transcateter (IVAT). Métodos: Neste estudo, foram avaliados retrospectivamente 303 pacientes submetidos ao procedimento de IVAT com diagnóstico de estenose aórtica grave entre 1º de janeiro de 2012 e 31 de dezembro de 2018. Os pacientes foram divididos de acordo com o tipo de anestesia administrada durante cada procedimento como; anestesia geral (AG), anestesia local (AL). Resultados: O AL foi preferido em 245 (80,8%) dos 303 pacientes submetidos ao IVAT, enquanto o AG foi preferido em 58 pacientes (19,1%). As idades medianas de nossos pacientes que receberam AL e AG foram 83 e 84, respectivamente. A duração do procedimento e da anestesia dos pacientes do grupo AG foi maior que do grupo AL (p0,05), exceto para doença arterial periférica. A hipertensão foi a comorbidade mais comum em ambos os grupos. Embora o número de uso de inotrópicos tenha sido significativamente maior nos pacientes que receberam AG (p0,05). Terapia intensiva e internações hospitalares foram significativamente menores no grupo AL (p = 0,001, p = 0,023, respectivamente). Conclusão: A técnica anestésica do procedimento IVAT não teve efeito significativo nos desfechos incluindo; complicações, mortalidade e sucesso do procedimento. AL proporciona menor duração do procedimento e internação hospitalar.
Palavras-chave
References
1 V.T. Nkomo, J.M. Gardin, T.N. Skelton, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study Lancet., 368 (2006), pp. 1005-1011
2 C.M. Otto, B. Prendergast Aortic-valve stenosis-from patients at risk to severe valve obstruction N Engl J Med., 371 (2014), pp. 744-756
3 P. Varadarajan, N. Kapoor, R.C. Bansal, et al. Clinical profile and natural history of 453 nonsurgically managed patients with severe aortic stenosis Ann Thorac Surg., 82 (2006), pp. 2111-2115
4 W. Dichtl, H.F. Alber, G.M. Feuchtner, et al. Prognosis and risk factors in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis and their modulation by atorvastatin (20 mg) Am J Cardiol., 102 (2008), pp. 743-748
5 D.S. Bach, D. Siao, S.E. Girard, et al. Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: the potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes., 2 (2009), pp. 533-539
6 T. Adademir, D. Çekmecelioğlu, D. Çevirme, et al. It’s not fair to compare transcatheter aortic valve implantation with surgical replacement E J Cardiovasc Med., 5 (2017), pp. 91-94
7 M.E. Gürcü, F. Güzelmeriç, A. Erkılınç, et al. Kliniğimizde Transkateter Aort Replasmanı Yapılan Hastalarda Anestezi Deneyimimiz GKDA Derg., 22 (2016), pp. 145-151
8 S.J. Brecker, S. Bleiziffer, J. Bosmans, et al. Impact of Anesthesia Type on Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Multicenter ADVANCE Study) Am J Cardiol., 117 (2016), pp. 1332-1338
9 M. Azizoğlu, L. Özdemir, B. Özkan, et al. Transkateter Aortik Valv İmplantasyonu İşleminde Anestezi Deneyimlerimiz JARSS., 26 (2018), pp. 164-168
10 B.R. Lindman, P. Pibarot, S.V. Arnold, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with diabetes and severe aortic stenosis at high risk for surgery: an analysis of the PARTNER 13 Trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valve) J Am Coll Cardiol., 63 (2014), pp. 1090-1099
11 R.D. Covello, G. Landoni, A. Zangrillo Anesthetic management of transcatheter aortic valve implantation Curr Opin Anaesthesiol., 24 (2011), pp. 417-425
12 L. Bergmann, P. Kahlert, H. Eggebrecht, et al. Trans¬femoral aortic valve implantation under sedation and monitored anaesthetic care--a feasibility study Anaesthesia., 66 (2011), pp. 977-982
13 R.D. Covello, G. Maj, G. Landoni, et al. Anesthetic management of percutaneous aortic valve implantation: focus on challenges encountered and proposed solutions J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth., 23 (2009), pp. 280-285
14 A. Franco, C. Gerli, L. Ruggeri, et al. Anaesthetic management of transcatheter aortic valve implantation Ann Card Anaesth., 15 (2012), pp. 54-63
15 A. Vahanian, O. Alfieri, F. Andreotti, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012) Eur Heart J., 33 (2012), pp. 2451-2496
16 G. Dall’Ara, H. Eltchaninoff, N. Moat, et al. Transcatheter Valve Treatment Sentinel Registry (TCVT) Investigators of the EurObservational Research Programme (EORP) of the European Society of Cardiology. Local and general anaesthesia do not influence outcome of transfemoral aortic valve implantation Int J Card., 177 (2014), pp. 448-454
17 M. Eskandari, O. Aldalati, R. Dwarakowski, et al. Comparison of general anaesthesia and non-general anaesthesia approach in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation Heart., 104 (2018), pp. 1621-1628
18 R. Lange, S. Bleiziffer, N. Piazza, et al. Incidence and treatment of procedural cardiovascular complications associated with trans-arterial and trans-apical interventional aortic valve implantation in 412 consecutive patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg., 40 (2011), pp. 1105-1113
19 J. Fassl Pro: transcatheter aortic valve implantation should be performed with general anesthesia J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth., 26 (2012), pp. 733-735
20 L.J. Motloch, D. Rottlander, S. Reda, et al. Local versus general anesthesia for transfemoral aortic valve implantation Clin Res Cardiol., 101 (2012), pp. 45-53
21 A.S. Petronia, C. Giannini, M. De Carlo, et al. Anaesthetic management of transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the Italian Core Valve registry EuroIntervention., 12 (2016), pp. 381-388
22 E. Melidi, G. Latsois, K. Toutouzas, et al. Cardio-anesthesiology considerations for the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedure Hellenic J Cardiol., 57 (2016), pp. 401-406
23 P.G. Guinot, J.P. Depoix, L. Etchegoyen, et al. Anesthesia and perioperative management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: analysis of 90 consecutive patients with focus on perioperative comp¬lications J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth., 24 (2010), pp. 752-761
24 F. Guarracino, G. Landoni Con: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation should not be performed under general anesthesia J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth., 26 (2012), pp. 736-739
25 Nutritional anaemias Report of a WHO scientific group World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser., 405 (1968), pp. 5-37
26 T. Walther, M. Arsalan, W.-K. Kim, et al. Review: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation EMJ Int Cardiol., 1 (2014), pp. 117-123
27 P.A. Villablanca, D. Mohananey, K. Nikolic, et al. Comparison of local versus general anesthesia in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis Catheter Cardiovasc Interv., 91 (2018), pp. 330-342
28 M. Yamamoto, K. Meguro, G. Mouillet, et al. Effect of local anesthetic management with conscious sedation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation Am J Cardiol., 111 (2013), pp. 94-99
29 C. Ehret, R. Rossaint, A.C. Foldenauer, et al. Is local anaesthesia a favourable approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing local and general anaesthesia BMJ Open., 7 (2017), Article e016321
30 A. Çiftçi, E. Kesimci, T. Gümüş, et al. Lokal anestezi ve sedasyon altında yapılan transkateter aort kapak cerrahisi hastalarındaki anestezi deneyimlerimiz GKDA Derg., 20 (2014), pp. 202-208
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email