Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.06.006
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Original Investigation

Comparison of three intraoperative analgesic strategies in laparoscopic bariatric surgery – a retrospective study of immediate postoperative outcomes

Comparação de três estratégias analgésicas intraoperatórias em cirurgia bariátrica laparoscópica: um estudo retrospectivo dos resultados pós-operatórios imediatos

Leopoldo Muniz da Silva; Anthony M.H. Ho; Daniel Rodrigues de Oliveira; Arthur de Campos Vieira Abib; Saullo Queiroz Silveira; Anna Beatriz Aranha; Vitor Oliveira André; Patrícia Rennó Pinto; Rafael Souza Fava Nersessian; Glenio B. Mizubuti

Downloads: 2
Views: 1306

Abstract

Introduction and objectives
Multimodal Analgesia (MMA) has shown promising results in postoperative outcomes across a broad spectrum of surgeries, including bariatric surgery. We compared the analgesic effect immediately after Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery (LBS) of the combined effect of MMA and methadone against two techniques that were based mainly on the use of high-potency medium-acting opioids.

Methods
Two hundred seventy-one patients were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score > 3/10 measured by the Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) during the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU) stay. The three protocols of intraoperative analgesia were: (P1) sufentanil at anesthetic induction followed by remifentanil infusion; (P2) sufentanil at induction followed by dexmedetomidine infusion; and (P3) remifentanil at induction followed by MMA including dexmedetomidine, magnesium, lidocaine, and methadone. Only P1 and P2 patients received morphine toward the end of surgery. Poisson regression was used to adjust confounding factors and calculate Prevalence Ratio (PR).

Results
Postoperative VNS > 3 was recorded in 135 (49.81%) patients, of which 93 (68.89%) were subjected to P1, 25 (18.56%) to P2, and 17 (12.59%) to P3. In the final adjusted model, both anesthetic techniques (P3) (PR = 0.10; 95% CI [0.03–0.28]), and (P2) (PR = 0.42%; 95% CI [0.20–0.90]) were associated with lower occurrence of VNS > 3, whereas age range 20–29 was associated to higher occurrence of VNS > 3 (PR = 3.21; 95% CI [1.22–8.44]) in PACU. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) was distributed as follows: (P1) 20.3%, (P2) 31.25% and (P3) 6.77%; (P3 < P1, P2; p < 0.05). Intraoperative hypotension occurred more often in P3 (39%) compared to P2 (20.31%) and P1 (17.46%) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion
MMA + methadone was associated with higher incidence of intraoperative hypotension and lower incidence of moderate/severe pain in PACU after LBS.

Keywords

Bariatric surgery;  Laparoscopy;  Multimodal analgesia;  Perioperative analgesia;  Postoperative pain

Resumo

Introdução e objetivos: A analgesia multimodal (AMM) tem mostrado resultados promissores nos resultados pós-operatórios em um amplo espectro de cirurgias, incluindo a cirurgia bariátrica. Comparamos o efeito analgésico imediatamente após a cirurgia bariátrica laparoscópica (LBS) do efeito combinado de AMM e metadona com duas técnicas baseadas principalmente no uso de opioides de média ação de alta potência. Métodos: Duzentos e setenta e um pacientes foram revisados retrospectivamente. O desfecho primário foi escore de dor pós-operatória > 3/10 medido pela escala numérica verbal (ENV) durante a permanência na unidade de recuperação pós-anestésica (SRPA). Os três protocolos de analgesia intraoperatória foram: (P1) sufentanil na indução anestésica seguida de infusão de remifentanil; (P2) sufentanil na indução seguida de infusão de dexmedetomidina; e (P3) remifentanil na indução seguido de AMM incluindo dexmedetomidina, magnésio, lidocaína e metadona. Apenas os pacientes P1 e P2 receberam morfina no final da cirurgia. A regressão de Poisson foi utilizada para ajustar os fatores de confusão e calcular a razão de prevalência (RP). Resultados: VNS pós-operatório > 3 foi registrado em 135 (49,81%) pacientes, dos quais 93 (68,89%) foram submetidos a P1, 25 (18,56%) a P2 e 17 (12,59%) a P3. No modelo final ajustado, ambas as técnicas anestésicas (P3) [RP = 0,10; IC 95% (0,03–0,28)], e (P2) [RP = 0,42%; IC 95% (0,20–0,90)] foram associados à menor ocorrência de VNS > 3, enquanto a faixa etária de 20 a 29 foi associada a maior ocorrência de VNS > 3 [RP = 3,21; IC 95% (1,22–8,44)] na SRPA. Náuseas e vômitos pós-operatórios (NVPO) distribuíram-se da seguinte forma: (P1) 20,3%, (P2) 31,25% e (P3) 6,77%; (P3 < P1, P2; p < 0,05). A hipotensão intraoperatória ocorreu mais frequentemente em P3 (39%) em comparação a P2 (20,31%) e P1 (17,46%) (p < 0,05). Conclusão: AMM + metadona foi associado a maior incidência de hipotensão intraoperatória e menor incidência de dor moderada/severa na SRPA após LBS.

Palavras-chave

Cirurgia bariatrica; Laparoscopia; Analgesia multimodal; Analgesia perioperatória; Dor pós-operatória

References

1 J. Luo, S. Min Postoperative pain management in the postanesthesia care unit: an update J Pain Res, 10 (2017), pp. 2687-2698

2 J.L. Apfelbaum, J.H. Silverstein, F.F. Chung, et al. Practice guidelines for postanesthetic care: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Postanesthetic Care Anesthesiology, 118 (2013), pp. 291-307

3 M. Majchrzak, A. Brzecka, C. Daroszewski, et al. Increased pain sensitivity in obese patients after lung cancer surgery Front Pharmacol, 10 (2019), p. 626

4 S.A. Schug, A. Raymann Postoperative pain management of the obese patient Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 25 (2011), pp. 73-81

5 K.S. Ladha, E. Patorno, K.F. Huybrechts, et al. Variations in the use of perioperative multimodal analgesic therapy Anesthesiology, 124 (2016), pp. 837-845

6 GS Murphy, JW Szokol Intraoperative methadone in surgical patients: a review of clinical investigations Anesthesiology, 131 (2019), pp. 678-692

7 F.C. Machado, J.E. Vieira, F.A. de Orange, et al. Intraoperative methadone reduces pain and opioid consumption in acute postoperative pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis Anesth Analg., 129 (2019), pp. 1723-1732

8 F.C. Machado, C.C.A. Palmeira, J.N.L. Torres, et al. Intraoperative use of methadone improves control of postoperative pain in morbidly obese patients: a randomized controlled study J Pain Res, 11 (2018), pp. 2123-2129

9 R. Wengritzky, T. Mettho, P.S. Myles, et al. Development and validation of a postoperative nausea and vomiting intensity scale Br J Anaesth, 104 (2010), pp. 158-166

10 N. Siddiqui, C. Arzola, J. Teresi, et al. Predictors of desaturation in the postoperative anesthesia care unit: an observational study J Clin Anesth, 8 (2013), pp. 612-617

11 H. Komen, L.M. Brunt, E. Deych, et al. Intraoperative methadone in same-day ambulatory surgery: a randomized, double-blinded, dose-finding pilot study Anesth Analg, 128 (2019), pp. 802-810

12 M.C. Kendall, L.J. Alvez, K. Pence, T. Mukhdomi, et al. The effect of intraoperative methadone compared to morphine on postsurgical pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Anesthesiol Res Pract (2020), Article 6974321

13 A. Gottschalk, M.E. Durieux, E.C. Nemergut Intraoperative methadone improves postoperative pain control in patients undergoing complex spine surgery Anesth Analg, 112 (2011), pp. 218-223

14 H.Y.V. Ip, A. Abrishami, P.W.H. Peng, et al. Predictors of postoperative pain and analgesic consumption: a qualitative systematic review Anesthesiology, 111 (2009), pp. 657-677

15 N. Kizilcik, O. Koner Magnesium sulfate reduced opioid consumption in obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized clinical trial Obes Surg, 28 (2018), pp. 2783-2788

16 MB El Mourad, SK Arafa Effect of intravenous versus intraperitoneal magnesium sulfate on hemodynamic parameters and postoperative analgesia during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy—a prospective randomized study J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol, 35 (2019), pp. 242-247

17 G. Blaudszun, C. Lysakowski, N. Elia, et al. Effect of perioperative systemic alpha2 agonists on postoperative morphine consumption and pain intensity: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials Anesthesiology, 116 (2012), pp. 1312-1322

18 S. Weibel, Y. Jelting, N.L. Pace, et al. Continuous intravenous perioperative lidocaine infusion for postoperative pain and recovery in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6 (2018), Article CD009642

19 I.L. Tyler, B. Tantisira, P.M. Winter, et al. Continuous monitoring of arterial oxygen saturation with pulse oximetry during transfer to the recovery room Anesth Analg, 64 (1985), pp. 1108-1112

20 RF Simoni, AMSA Pereira, RS Borega, et al. Continuous infusion of remifentanil versus sufentanil in videolaparoscopic surgeries: a comparative study Braz J Anesth, 58 (2008), pp. 193-201

21 R.D. Horsley, E.D. Vogels, D.A.P. McField, et al. Multimodal postoperative pain control is effective and reduces opioid use after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Obes Surg, 29 (2019), pp. 394-400

22 A.M.H. Ho, R. Phelan, G.B. Mizubuti, et al. Bias in before-and-after studies. A narrative overview for anesthesiologists Anesth Analg, 126 (2018), pp. 1755-1762
 

60e702eda953950b734f3e73 rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections