The inductor role of cardiac consultation in the pre-anesthetic evaluation of asymptomatic patients submitted to non-cardiac minor and intermediate-risk surgery: a cross-sectional study
O papel indutor da interconsulta cardiológica em avaliações préanestésicas de pacientes assintomáticos submetidos a cirurgias nãocardíacas de baixo e médio portes: um estudo transversal.
Antonio Carlos Cerqueira Oliveira Paulo Adriano Schwingel Lucas Archanjo dos Santos Luis Cláudio Lemos Correia
Abstract
Introduction
Asymptomatic patients with moderate functional capacity do not require Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) workup in the preoperative period of non-cardiac surgeries, especially when scheduled for minor and intermediate-risk surgeries. The workup is inappropriate because it promotes over diagnosing and pointless treatments. Moreover, those patients usually undergo cardiology assessment, in addition to pre-anesthetic evaluation.
Objective
Investigate the role of cardiology consultation as mediator in inappropriate assessment of CAD for preoperative of non-cardiac surgeries.
Method
Retrospective study performed in a private anesthesia service using medical charts of asymptomatic patients with a history of controlled systemic disease and moderate functional capacity, submitted to pre-anesthetic consultation for minor and intermediate risk surgeries. Cardiology consultations were identified by the presence of a consultation report by a cardiologist. CAD workup was defined as undergoing cardiac stress tests.
Results
We included 390 medical charts of patients with mean age of 48.6 ± 15.4 years, 67% women and 69% intermediate risk surgeries. CAD workup was infrequent and performed in 3.9% of patients. Besides, pre-anesthetic evaluation, 93 (24%) patients had a cardiology consultation. Among those patients, 15.1% were submitted to CAD workup, compared to 0.34% of patients without cardiology assessment (p < 0.001; RR = 4.4; 95% CI: 3.5–5.6).
Conclusions
Inappropriate testing for CAD investigation is infrequent for asymptomatic individuals submitted to minor and intermediate risk surgeries. However, cardiology consultation increases substantially the likelihood of a patient undergoing CAD workup, suggesting that, unlike the anesthesiologist, the cardiologist is a major mediator of this kind of management.
Keywords
Resumo
Justificativa: Pacientes assintomáticos com capacidade funcional moderada não têm indicação de pesquisa de doença arterial coronariana (DAC) no pré-operatório de cirurgias não cardíacas, especialmente de pequeno ou médio portes. Essa pesquisa é inapropriada por promover sobrediagnóstico e tratamentos fúteis. Ademais, esses pacientes eventualmente passam por avaliação cardiológica além da pré-anestésica. Objetivo: Explorar o papel da consulta cardiológica como mediador de pesquisa inapropriada de DAC em pré-operatório de cirurgias não cardíacas. Método: Estudo retrospectivo realizado em serviço de anestesiologia privado com prontuários de pacientes assintomáticos, sem histórico de doenças sistêmicas descompensadas e capacidade funcional moderada, submetidos a consulta pré-anestésica para cirurgias de pequeno e médio portes. Consulta cardiológica foi identificada pela presença de relatório de interconsulta realizada por cardiologista. Pesquisa de DAC foi definida pela execução de testes de estresse cardíaco. Resultados: Foram incluídos 390 prontuários, idade 48,6±15,4 anos, 67% mulheres e 69% cirurgias de médio porte. Pesquisa de DAC foi infrequente, realizada em 3,9% dos pacientes. Além da avaliação pré-anestésica, consulta cardiológica foi realizada em 93 (24%) pacientes. Dentro desses pacientes 15,1% foram submetidos a pesquisa de DAC, comparados aos 0,34% nos pacientes sem avaliação cardiológica (P<0,001; RR:4,4 IC95%:3,5–5,6). Conclusões: Exames inapropriados para pesquisa de DAC são infrequentes na população de pessoas assintomáticas submetidas a cirurgias de pequeno a médio portes. No entanto, a presença de avaliação cardiológica aumenta substancialmente a probabilidade do paciente se submeter a este tipo de exame, sugerindo que, diferente do anestesiologista, o cardiologista é um importante mediador deste tipo de conduta.
Palavras-chave
References
1 F. García-Miguel, P. Serrano-Aguilar, J. López-Bastida Preoperative assessment Lancet., 362 (2003), pp. 1749-1757
2 R. Sahi, A. Sayami, R.M. Gajurel, et al. Prevalence and patterns of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for rheumatic and non-rheumatic valvular heart disease in a tertiary care center of Nepal Nepal Hear J., 15 (2018), pp. 21-24
3 S.F. Khuri, J. Daley, W. Henderson, et al. The National Veterans Administration Surgical Risk Study: risk adjustment for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care J Am Coll Surg., 180 (1995), pp. 519-531
4 K.M. Sheffield, P.S. McAdams, J. Benarroch-Gampel, et al. Overuse of preoperative cardiac stress testing in medicare patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery Ann Surg., 257 (2013), pp. 73-80
5 M.F. Roizen Cost-effective preoperative laboratory testing JAMA., 271 (1994), pp. 319-320
6 S. Dzankic, D. Pastor, C. Gonzalez, J.M. Leung The prevalence and predictive value of abnormal preoperative laboratory tests in elderly surgical patients Anesth Analg., 93 (2001), pp. 301-308
7 V. Velanovich The value of routine preoperative laboratory testing in predicting postoperative complications: a multivariate analysis Surgery., 109 (3 Pt 1) (1991), pp. 236-243
8 B. Peterson, M. Ghahramani, M. Emerich, A.J. Foy Frequency of appropriate and low risk noncardiac preoperative stress testing across medical specialties Am J Cardiol., 122 (2018), pp. 744-748
9 O.D. Schein, J. Katz, E.B. Bass, et al. The value of routine preoperative medical testing before cataract surgery. Study of Medical Testing for Cataract Surgery N Engl J Med., 342 (2000), pp. 168-175
10 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Preoperative Tests The Use of Routine Preoperative Tests for Elective Surgery, National Collaborating Centre for Acute Care, London (2003)
11 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Preoperative tests (Update) Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London (2016)
12 M. Flamm, G. Fritsch, J. Seer, S. Panisch, A.C. Sönnichsen Non-adherence to guidelines for preoperative testing in a secondary care hospital in Austria: the economic impact of unnecessary and double testing Eur J Anaesthesiol., 28 (2011), pp. 867-873
13 T. Johansson, G. Fritsch, M. Flamm, et al. Effectiveness of non-cardiac preoperative testing in non-cardiac elective surgery: a systematic review Br J Anaesth., 110 (2013), pp. 926-939
14 J.H. Abramson WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential Epidemiol Perspect Innov., 8 (2011), p. 1
15 T.H. Lee, E.R. Marcantonio, C.M. Mangione, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery Circulation., 100 (1999), pp. 1043-1049
16 M.A. Hlatky, R.E. Boineau, M.B. Higginbotham, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index) Am J Cardiol., 64 (1989), pp. 651-654
17 M.R. Sousa, R. Mourilhe-Rocha, A.A.V. Paola, et al. 1st Guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology on processes and skills for education in cardiology in Brazil: executive summary Arq Bras Cardiol, 98 (2012), pp. 98-103
18 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). ASA physical status classification system. https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system. Published 2014.
19 A.P. Garcia, K.A. Pastorio, R.L. Nunes, G.F. Locks, M.C.S. Almeida Indication of preoperative tests according to clinical criteria: need for supervision Rev Bras Anestesiol., 64 (2014), pp. 54-61
20 M.R.N. Issa, N.F.C. Isoni, A.M. Soares, M.L. Fernandes Avaliação pré-anestésica e redução dos custos do preparo pré-operatório Rev Bras Anestesiol., 61 (2011), pp. 65-71
21 H. Tariq, R. Ahmed, S. Kulkarni, et al. Development, functioning, and effectiveness of a preoperative risk assessment clinic Heal Serv Insights., 9 (Suppl 1) (2016), p. 1
22 B.M. Parker, J.E. Tetzlaff, D.L. Litaker, W.G. Maurer Redefining the preoperative evaluation process and the role of the anesthesiologist J Clin Anesth., 12 (2000), pp. 350-356
23 J. Chen, H. Liu Is perioperative home the future of surgical patient care? J Biomed Res., 29 (2015), pp. 173-175
24 J.F. Foss, J. Apfelbaum Economics of preoperative evaluation clinics Curr Opin Anaesthesiol., 14 (2001), pp. 559-562
25 E.A. Kerr, J. Chen, J.B. Sussman, M.L. Klamerus, B.K. Nallamothu Stress testing before low-risk surgery: so many recommendations, so little overuse JAMA Intern Med., 175 (2015), pp. 645-647
26 C.K. Cassel, J.A. Guest Choosing wisely: Helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care JAMA - J Am Med Assoc., 307 (2012), pp. 1801-1802
27 S. De Hert, G. Imberger, J. Carlisle, et al. Preoperative evaluation of the adult patient undergoing non-cardiac surgery Eur J Anaesthesiol., 28 (2011), pp. 684-722
28 D.F. Reilly, M.J. McNeely, D. Doerner, et al. Self-reported exercise tolerance and the risk of serious perioperative complications Arch Intern Med., 159 (1999), pp. 2185-2192
29 L.A. Fleisher, K.E. Fleischmann, A.D. Auerbach, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA Guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery Circulation., 130 (2014), pp. e278-333