Impact of Grade I obesity on respiratory mechanics during video laparoscopic surgery
Impacto da obesidade Grau I na mecânica respiratória durante cirurgia videolaparoscópica: estudo longitudinal prospectivo
Orlandira Costa Araujo, Eloisa Bonetti Espada, Fernanda Magalhães Arantes Costa, Julia Araujo Vigiato, Maria José Carvalho Carmona, José Pinhata Otoch, João Manoel Silva Jr, Milton de Arruda Martins
Abstract
Introduction and objectives
The association pneumoperitoneum and obesity in video laparoscopy can contribute to pulmonary complications, but has not been well defined in specific groups of obese individuals. We assessed the effects of pneumoperitoneum in respiratory mechanics in Grade I obese compared to non-obese.
Methods
Prospective study including 20 patients submitted to video laparoscopic cholecystectomy, normal spirometry, divided into non-obese (BMI ≤ 25 kg.m-2) and obese (BMI > 30 kg.mg-2), excluding Grade II and III obese. We measured pulmonary ventilation mechanics data before pneumoperitoneum (baseline), and five, fifteen and thirty minutes after peritoneal insufflation, and fifteen minutes after disinflation (final). Results: Mean BMI of non-obese was 22.72 ± 1.43 kg.m-2 and of the obese 31.78 ± 1.09 kg.m-2, p < 0.01. Duration of anesthesia and of peritoneal insufflation was similar between groups. Baseline pulmonary compliance (Crs) of the obese (38.3 ± 8.3 mL.cm H2O-1) was lower than of the non-obese (47.4 ± 5.7 mL.cm H2O-1), p = 0.01. After insufflation, Crs decreased in both groups and remained even lower in the obese at all moments assessed (GLM p < 0.01). Respiratory system peak pressure and plateau pressure were higher in the obese, albeit variations were similar at moments analyzed (GLM p > 0.05). The same occurred with elastic pressure, higher in the obese at all times (GLM p = 0.04), and resistive pressure showed differences in variations between groups during pneumoperitoneum (GLM p = 0,05).
Conclusions
Grade I obese presented more changes in pulmonary mechanics than the non-obese during video laparoscopies and the fact requires mechanical ventilation-related care.
Keywords
References
1 WHO World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. Fact sheet of the World Health Organization (2016) Available on: http:/www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.
2 K.M. Flegal, D. Kruszon-Moran, M.D. Carroll, et al. Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014 JAMA, 315 (2016), pp. 2284-2291
3 S.M. Pereira, M.R. Tucci, C.C.A. Morais, et al. Individual positive end-expiratory pressure settings optimize intraoperative mechanical ventilation and reduce postoperative atelectasis Anesthesiology., 129 (2018), pp. 1070-1081
4 P. Pelosi, I. Ravagnan, G. Giurati, et al. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia and paralysis Anesthesiology., 91 (1999), pp. 1221-1231
5 A.J. Cunningham Anesthesia for minimally invasive procedures P.G.C.B. Barash, R.K. Stoelting (Eds.), Clinical Anesthesia, Lippincott Williams & Wikins, Philadelphia (2001), pp. 1051-1065
6 F. Valenza, G. Chevallard, T. Fossali, et al. Management of mechanical ventilation during laparoscopic surgery Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol., 24 (2010), pp. 227-241
7 A. Baydur, P.K. Behrakis, W.A. Zin, et al. A simple method for assessing the validity of the esophageal balloon technique Am Rev Respir Dis, 126 (1982), pp. 788-791
8 J.C. Sebastian Respiratory physiology and pulmonary complications in obesity Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab., 27 (2013), pp. 157-161
9 L.E. Hodgson, P.B. Murphy, N. Hart Respiratory management of the obese patient undergoing surgery J Thorac Dis., 7 (2015), pp. 943-952
10 J. Eriksen, J. Andersen, J.P. Rasmussen, et al. Effects of ventilation with large tidal volumes or positive end-expiratory pressure on cardiorespiratory function in anesthetized obese patients Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica., 22 (1978), pp. 241-248
11 P. Pelosi, C. Gregoretti Perioperative management of obese patients Best Pract Res Clin Anesth., 24 (2010), pp. 211-225
12 E. Akoumianaki, S.M. Maggiore, F. Valenza, et al. The application of esophageal pressure measurement in patients with respiratory failure Am J Respir Crit Care Med., 189 (2014), pp. 520-531
13 P. Pelosi, M. Croci, I. Ravagnan, et al. The effects of body mass on lung volumes, respiratory mechanics, and gas exchange during general anesthesia Anesth Analg., 87 (1998), pp. 654-660
14 B.G. Fahy, G.M. Barnas, J.L. Flowers, et al. The effects of increased abdominal pressure on lung and chest wall mechanics during laparoscopic surgery Anest Analg., 81 (1995), pp. 744-750
15 L. Rizzoti, M. Vassiliou, A. Amygdalou, et al. Respiratory system mechanics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Resp Medicine., 96 (2002), pp. 268-274
16 J.M. Luce Respiratory complications of obesity Chest., 78 (1980), pp. 626-631
17 M.J. Tobin Respiratory monitoring in the intensive care unit Am Rev Respir Dis., 138 (1988), pp. 1625-1642
18 J.O.C. Auler, C.D. Giannini, D.F. Saragiotto Desafios no manuseio peri-operatório de pacientes obesos mórbidos: como prevenir complicações Rev Bras Anestesiol, 53 (2003), pp. 227-236
19 T. Bluth, R. Teichmann, T. Kiss, et al. Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Trials, 18 (2017), p. 202