Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/rba/article/doi/10.1016/j.bjane.2019.10.005
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Scientific Article

Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis after ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block: a prospective cohort study

Paralisia hemidiafragmática após bloqueio supraclavicular guiado por ultrassom: um estudo coorte prospectivo

Fabrice Ferré, Jean‐Mathieu Mastantuono, Charlotte Martin, Anne Ferrier, Philippe Marty, Pierre Laumonerie, Nicolas Bonnevialle, Vincent Minville

Downloads: 0
Views: 1083

Abstract

Background and objectives
The frequent onset of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis during interscalene block restricts its use in patients with respiratory insufficiency. Supraclavicular block could be a safe and effective alternative. Our primary objective was to assess the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block and compare it to that of interscalene block.

Methods
Adults warranting elective shoulder surgery under regional anesthesia (Toulouse University Hospital) were prospectively enrolled from May 2016 to May 2017 in this observational study. Twenty millilitres of 0.375% Ropivacaine were injected preferentially targeted to the “corner pocket”. Diaphragmatic excursion was measured by ultrasonography before and 30 minutes after regional anesthesia. A reduction ≥25% in diaphragmatic excursion during a sniff test defined the hemidiaphragmatic paralysis. Dyspnoea and hypoxaemia were recorded in the recovery room. Predictive factors of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (gender, age, weight, smoking, functional capacity) were explored. Postoperative pain was also analysed.

Results
Forty-two and 43 patients from respectively the supraclavicular block and interscalene block groups were analysed. The incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis was 59.5% in the supraclavicular block group compared to 95.3% in the interscalene block group (p < 0.0001). Paradoxical movement of the diaphragm was more common in the interscalene block group (RR = 2, 95% CI 1.4–3; p = 0.0001). A similar variation in oxygen saturation was recorded between patients with and without hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (p = 0.08). No predictive factor of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis could be identified. Morphine consumption and the highest numerical rating scale numerical rating scale (NRS) at 24 hours did not differ between groups.

Conclusions
Given the frequent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following supraclavicular block, this technique cannot be recommended for patients with an altered respiratory function.

Keywords

Regional anesthesia;  Phrenic nerve;  Diaphragmatic paralysis

Resumo

Justificativa e objetivos
O aparecimento frequente de paralisia hemidiafragmática durante o bloqueio interescalênico restringe seu uso em pacientes com insuficiência respiratória. O bloqueio supraclavicular pode ser uma opção segura e eficaz. Nosso objetivo primário foi avaliar a incidência de paralisia hemidiafragmática após bloqueio supraclavicular guiado por ultrassom e compará-lo com o bloqueio interescalênico.

Métodos
Os adultos agendados para cirurgia eletiva do ombro sob anestesia regional (Hospital Universitário de Toulouse) foram prospectivamente incluídos neste estudo observacional, de maio de 2016 a maio de 2017. Vinte mililitros de ropivacaína a 0,375% foram injetados, preferencialmente objetivando a interseção da primeira costela e da artéria subclávia. A excursão diafragmática foi medida por ultrassonografia antes e 30 minutos após a anestesia regional. Uma redução ≥ 25% na excursão diafragmática durante um sniff test definiu a paralisia hemidiafragmática. Dispneia e hipoxemia foram registradas na sala de recuperação. Fatores preditivos de paralisia hemidiafragmática (sexo, idade, peso, tabagismo, capacidade funcional) foram explorados. A dor pós-operatória também foi avaliada.

Resultados
Quarenta e dois e 43 pacientes dos grupos bloqueio supraclavicular e bloqueio interescalênico, respectivamente, foram avaliados. A incidência de paralisia hemidiafragmática foi de 59,5% no grupo bloqueio supraclavicular em comparação com 95,3% no grupo bloqueio interescalênico (p < 0,0001). O movimento paradoxal do diafragma foi mais comum no grupo bloqueio interescalênico (RR = 2, 95% IC 1,4–3; p = 0,0001). Uma variação semelhante na saturação de oxigênio foi registrada entre os pacientes com e sem paralisia hemidiafragmática (p = 0,08). Nenhum fator preditivo de paralisia hemidiafragmática pôde ser identificado. O consumo de morfina e o maior escore na escala numérica na escala numérica (NRS) em 24 horas não diferiram entre os grupos.

Conclusões
Devido à frequente incidência de paralisia hemidiafragmática após bloqueio supraclavicular, essa técnica não pode ser recomendada para pacientes com função respiratória alterada.

Palavras-chave

Anestesia regional;  Nervo frênico;  Paralisia diafragmática

References

1 M.J. Fredrickson, S. Krishnan, C.Y. Chen Postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery: a critical appraisal and review of current techniques Anaesthesia, 65 (2010), pp. 608-624

2 F. Ferré, N. Cugnin, C. Martin, et al. Regional anesthesia with noninvasive ventilation for shoulder surgery in a patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a case report A A Case Rep, 8 (2017), pp. 261-264

3 W.F. Urmey, K.H. Talts, N.E. Sharrock One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography Anesth Analg, 72 (1991), pp. 498-503

4 D.Q. Tran, M.F. Elgueta, J. Aliste, et al. Diaphragm-sparing nerve blocks for shoulder surgery Reg Anesth Pain Med, 42 (2017), pp. 32-38

5 S.D. Petrar, M.E. Seltenrich, S.J. Head, et al. Hemidiaphragmatic paralysis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular versus infraclavicular brachial plexus blockade: a randomized clinical trial Reg Anesth Pain Med, 40 (2015), pp. 133-138

6 S.H. Renes, H.H. Spoormans, M.J. Gielen, et al. Hemidiaphragmatic paresis can be avoided in ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block Reg Anesth Pain Med, 34 (2009), pp. 595-599

7 A. Boussuges, Y. Gole, P. Blanc Diaphragmatic motion studied by m-mode ultrasonography: methods, reproducibility, and normal values Chest, 135 (2009), pp. 391-400

8 L.G. Soares, R. Brull, J. Lai, et al. Eight ball, corner pocket: the optimal needle position for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block Reg Anesth Pain Med, 32 (2007), pp. 94-95

9 M.J. Nadeau, S. Levesque, N. Dion Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia for upper limb surgery Can J Anaesth, 60 (2013), pp. 304-320

10 F.D. McCool, G.E. Tzelepis Dysfunction of the diaphragm N Engl J Med, 366 (2012), pp. 932-942

11 P.H. Mak, M.G. Irwin, C.G. Ooi, et al. Incidence of diaphragmatic paralysis following supraclavicular brachial plexus block and its effect on pulmonary function Anaesthesia, 56 (2001), pp. 352-356

12 M. Loukas, C.R. Kinsella Jr, R.G. Louis Jr, et al. Surgical anatomy of the accessory phrenic nerve Ann Thorac Surg, 82 (2006), pp. 1870-1875

13 P. Marty, F. Ferré, B. Basset, C. Marquis, B. Bataille, M. Chaubard, et al. Diaphragmatic paralysis in obese patients in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: consequences and causes J Anesth, 32 (2018), pp. 333-340

14 D.B. Auyong, N.A. Hanson, R.S. Joseph, et al. Comparison of Anterior Suprascapular, Supraclavicular, and Interscalene Nerve Block Approaches for Major Outpatient Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind, Noninferiority Trial Anesthesiology, 129 (2018), pp. 47-57

15 T. Ryu, B.T. Kil, J.H. Kim Comparison between ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and interscalene brachial plexus blocks in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, parallel study Medicine (Baltimore), 94 (2015), p. e1726

16 D. Matamis, E. Soilemezi, M. Tsagourias, E. Akoumianaki, S. Dimassi, F. Boroli, et al. Sonographic evaluation of the diaphragm in critically ill patients. Technique and clinical applications Intensive Care Med, 39 (2013), pp. 801-810

17 A. Sarwal, F.O. Walker, M.S. Cartwright Neuromuscular ultrasound for evaluation of the diaphragm Muscle Nerve, 47 (2013), pp. 319-329
 

5e4599bd0e8825c55259a71e rba Articles
Links & Downloads

Braz J Anesthesiol

Share this page
Page Sections