Has article title relation with the number of citations in Brazilian medical literature?
Renan Kleber Costa Teixeira, Daniel Haber Feijó, Luan Teles Ferreira de Carvalho, Faustino Chaves Calvo, Deivid Ramos dos Santos, Nara Macedo Botelho
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the importance of the title structure on the citation rate in Brazilian literature. Methods: All the original research articles published in five Brazilian medical journals were analyzed. The numbers of citations of each article was retrieved from Google Scholar and each title was placed into one of the three groups: 1) titles describing the research methods/ design (methods-describing title); 2) titles describing the results/conclusions (results-describing title); and 3) titles that were nonclassifiable. Number of words and characters; reference to a geographical area; use of a hyphen or colon; mentioning of drugs; and description of study design were extracted. Results: There were 442 (88.4%) methods-describing titles, 43 (8.6%) resultsdescribing titles, and 15 (3%) questions titles. The number of citations for the group 1 was significantly less than the number of citations for group 2 and group 3 articles (p<0.05). There were no correlations between the number of characters and words in the title and the numbers of citations. Titles referring to a specific geographical region were significantly more cited than titles that did not reference a geographical region. Conclusion: The structure proposing a question, along with the results-describing titles were found to be relevant for a high citation rate nationally since it facilitates the literature review. The presence of a specific geographical location on the title also proved to be significant probably due to a great regionalization of diseases in Brazil.
Keywords
Referências
1. Rostami F, Mohammadpoorasl A, Hajizadeh M. The effect of characteristics of title on citation rates of articles. Scientometrics. 2014;98(3):2007-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1118-1.
2. Simkin MV, Roychowdhury VP. Read before you cite. Complex Syst. 2003;14:269-74.
3. Volpato GL. Dicas para redação científica. 2. ed. Botucatu: Diagrama, Comunicação Gráfica e Editora. 2006.
4. Ball R. Scholarly communication in transition: the use of question marks in the titles of scientific articles in medicine, life sciences and physics 1966–2005. Scientometrics. 2009;79(3):667-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1984-5.
5. Jamali H, Nikzad M. Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations. Scientometrics. 2011;88(2):653-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0412-z.
6. Soler V. Writing titles in science: an exploratory study. Engl Specif Purposes. 2007;26(1):90-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.08.001.
7. Habibzadeh F, Yadollahie M. Are shorter article titles more attractive for citations? Cross- sectional study of 22 scientific journals. Croat Med J. 2010;51(2):165-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.165. PMid:20401960.
8. American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine. Information for Authors. 2014. Avaliable in: https://annals.org/aim/pages/authors
9. Jacques TS, Sebire NJ. The impact of article titles on citation hits: an analysis of general and specialist medical journals. JRSM Short Rep. 2010;1(1):1-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2009.100020. PMid:21103094.
10. Anthony L. Characteristic features of research article titles in computer science. IEEE Trans Prof Commun. 2010;44(3):187-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/47.946464.
11. Wang Y, Bai Y. A corpus-based syntactic study of medical research article titles. System. 2007;35(3):388-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.01.005.
12. Kane TS. Oxford Essential Guide to writing. New York: Berkley; 2000
13. Imbelloni LE. Títulos de trabalhos científicos: obrigado pela informação contida em seu título. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012 Mar-Abr;62(2):139-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-70942012000200001. PMid:22440370.
14. Manten AA, Greenhalgh JFD. Titles of scientific papers. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1997;2(1):1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(77)90035-9.
15. Cáceres AM, Gândara JP, Puglisi ML. Scientific writing and the quality of papers: towards a higher impact. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011;23(4):401-6. PMid:22231065.
16. Paiva CE, Lima JP, Paiva BS. Articles with short titles describing the results are cited more often. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(5):509-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(05)17. PMid:22666797.
17. Reuters T. Journal Citation Reports [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2012 Apr 16]. Available from: http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/science/science_products/a-z/journal_citation_reports/
18. Delgado-López-Cózar E, Cabezas-Clavijo Á. Ranking journals: could Google scholar metrics be an alternative to journal citation reports and Scimago journal rank? Learn Publ. 2013;26(2):101-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/20130206.
19. Thomson Reuters. Journal Citation Reports. 2012.Avaliable in: http://thomsonreuters.com/products services/science/science products/a-z/journal citation reports/
20. Florence AT. Cited but not read and read but not cited. Int J Pharm. 2015;492(1-2):264-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.07.038. PMid:26196274.
21. Neill US. How to write a scientific masterpiece. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(12):3599-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1172/JCI34288. PMid:18060016.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email