Manual Therapy, Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/mtprehab/article/doi/10.17784/mtprehabjournal.2016.14.381
Manual Therapy, Posturology & Rehabilitation Journal
Research Article

Inter-relationship between footprints and photogrammetry

Cunha, Francisco Valmor Macedo; Rodrigues, Tárik Augusto Amorim; Alves, Jonas Almeida; Santos, Jean Douglas Moura; Martins, Maria do Carmo Carvalho

Downloads: 1
Views: 341

Abstract

Introduction: Alterations in foot landing position have often been associated with the appearance of deformities in lower limbs. However, there are no studies that prove the relationship between these two variables in healthy individuals. Objective: To investigate the relation between changes in feet and lower limbs by plantigraphy and computerized photogrammetry. Methods: The study included 70 young adults, 42 women (height: 1.60±0.01 m; body weight: 58.0±0.92 kg; body mass index: 22.0±0.31 kg/m2 ) and 28 men (height: 1.70±0.01 m; body weight: 70.0±1.4 kg; body mass index: 23.0±0.42 kg/m2 ) with mean age of 21.62±2.0 and 22.18±2.09 years, respectively. Plantigraphy of both feet and photographic capture in the anterior frontal plane of lower limbs and foot, posterior frontal of the tendon of the calcaneus and in the sagittal plane of lower limbs were performed. Results: A strong positive correlation was observed between the Chippaux-Smirak and the Staheli indexes (Men– r: 0.863 and p<0.001; Women– r: 0.973 and p<0.001) and a weak positive correlation between the malleolar angle and the Cavanagh-Rodgers index (Men– r: 0.386 and p 0.003; Women– r: 0.280 and p 0.010). Conclusion: There was no correlation between footprint indexes and lower limb angles measured by computerized photogrammetry.

Keywords

photogrammetry, lower limb, foot, posture, medial longitudinal arch.

References

1 Hernandez AJ, Kimura LK, Laraya MHF, Fávaro E. Cálculo do índice do arco plantar de Staheli e a prevalência de pés planos: estudo em 100 crianças entre 5 e 9 anos de idade. Acta ortopédica brasileira. 2007;15(2):68-71.

2 Pezzan PAO, Sacco ICN, Silvia MAJ. Postura do pé e classificação do arco plantar de adolescentes usuárias e não usuárias de calçados de salto alto. Revista brasileira de fisioterapia. 2009;1(5):398-404.

3 Krishan K. Establishing correlation of footprints with body weight–Forensic aspects, Forens Scien Internat. 2008;179:63–69.

4 Trombini-Souza F, Ribeiro AP, Iunes DH, Monte-Raso VV. Correlações entre as estruturas dos membros inferiores. Fisioter Pesq. 2009;16(3):205-210.

5 Carvalho JA. Órteses: um recurso terapêutico complementar. Barueri - SP: Manole, 2006.

6 Mccrory JL, Young MJ, Boulton AJM, Cavanagh PR. Arch index as a predictor of arch height. Foot. 1997;7:79-81.

7 Hunt AE, Fahey AJ, Smith RM. Static measures of calcaneal deviation and arch angle as predictors of rearfoot motion during walking. Aust J Physiother. 2000;46:9-16.

8 Bricot B. Posturologia. 2 ed. São Paulo: Icone, 2001.

9 Urry SR, Wearing SC. The Accuracy of footprint contact area measurements: relevance to the design and performance of pressure platforms. The Foot. 2001;11:151-157.

10 Urry SR, Wearing SC. Arch indexes from ink footprints and pressure platforms are different. Foot. 2005;15:68-73.

11 Cantalino JLR, Mattos HM. Análise das impressões plantares emitidas por dois equipamentos distintos. ConScientiae Saúde. 2008;7(3):367-372.

12 Ricieri DV. Validação de um protocolo de fotogrametria computadorizada e quantificação angular do movimento tóracoabdominal durante a ventilação tranqüila. Dissertação (Mestrado) – UNITRI, Uberlândia: Centro Universitário do Triângulo, 2000.

13 Ribeiro AP, Trombini-Souza F, Iunes DH, Monte-raso VV. Confiabilidade inter e intra-examinador da fotopodometria e intra-examinador da fotopodoscopia. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia. 2006;10(4):435-439.

14 Iunes DH, Bevilaqua-grossi D, Oliveira AS. Análise comparativa entre avaliação postural visual e por fotogrametria computadorizada. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia. 2009;13(4):308-315.

15 Nikolaidou ME, Boudolos KD. A footprint-based approach for the rational classification of foot types in young schoolchildren. The Foot. 2006; 16: 82-9.

16 Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1987;69:426-428.

17 Gaymer C, Whalley H, Achten J, Vatish M. Midfoot plantar pressure significantly increases during late gestation. The Foot 2009;19:114-116.

18 Rodriguez N, Volpe RG. Clinical diagnosis and assessment of the pediatric pes planovalgus deformity. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2010;27:43–58.

19 Braz RG, Goes FPDC, Carvalho GA. Confiabilidade e validade de medidas angulares por meio do software para avaliação postural. Fisioterapia Mov. 2008;21(3):117-126.

20 Santos JDM, Oliveira MA, Silveira NJF, Carvalho SS, Oliveira AG. Confiabilidade inter e intraexaminadores nas mensurações angulares por fotogrametria digital e goniometria. Fisioter Mov. 2011;24(3):389-400.

21 Ramos GM, Pereira SRF, Nucci A. Avaliação computacional da impressão plantar valores de referência do índice do arco em amostra da população brasileira. Acta fisiatr.2007;14(1):7–10.

22 Hawes MR et al. Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot Ankle internat. 1992;13(1);22-26.

23 Mccrory JL, Young MJ, Boulton AJM, Cavanagh PR. Arch index as a predictor of arch height. Foot. 1997;7:79-81.

24 Guimarães GV, Freitas HFG, Silva PRS, Teixeira LR. Pés: devemos avaliá-los ao praticar atividade físico-esportiva? Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2000;6(2):57-59.

25 Azevedo LAP, Nascimento LFC. A distribuição da força plantar está associada aos diferentes tipos de pés? Rev Paul Pediatr. 2009;27(3):309-14.

26 Chen CH, Huang MH, Chen TW, Weng MC, Lee CL, Wang GJ. The correlation between selected measurements from footprint and radiograph of flatfoot. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2006;87:235-240.

27 Kanatli U, Yetkin H, Cila E. Footprint and radiographic analysis of the feet. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2001;21(2):225-228.

28 Qamra SR, Deodhar SD, Jit I. Podographical and metrical study for pes planus in a Northwestern Indian population. Human Biology. 1980;52:435–445.

29 Abreu AV, Barbosa JRP, Coelho JFP. Alinhamento dos joelhos no plano frontal dos 12 aos 17 anos. Rev Bras Ortop. 1996;31(1):83-88.

30 Castro PCG, Lopes JAF. Avaliação computadorizada por fotografia digital, como recurso de avaliação da reeducação postural global. Acta Fisiatr. 2003;10(2):83-88.

31 Tanaka C, Farah E. Anatomia funcional das cadeias musculares. São Paulo: Ícone, 1997.

32 Oliveira AP, Otowicz I. Análise do apoio dos pés no chão e a sua correlação com as disfunções biomecânicas da articulação ílio-sacra. Terapia Manual. 2004;2(3):122-127

33 Mathieson I, Upton D, Birchenough A. Comparison of footprint parameters calculated from static and dynamics footprints. The Foot. 1999;9(1):145-149.

5a9ee1a90e8825842577d859 mtprehab Articles
Links & Downloads

Man. Ther., Posturology Rehabil. J.

Share this page
Page Sections