30DEC

Libyan International Conference for Health Sciences

The First Libyan International Conference for Health Sciences (2024): Open University, Tripoli, Libya
Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/medjpps/article/doi/10.5281/zenodo.7479700

Mediterranean Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Original article

Rapid roadside drug testing in saliva using in vitro tongue

Mohamed H. Assaleh, Shaban G. Elosta, Ravi Shankar Ayyanar, Prakash Katakam, Shanta K. Adiki

Downloads: 0
Views: 23

Abstract

The propagation of drugs on the road was the main reason for focusing on the development of the rapid methods which are used to detect the presence of drugs which may have been taken. Oral fluid has become a popular specimen to test for the presence of drugs. In vitro tongues were prepared with different concentrations of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC E4M); one of these concentrations was chosen to be used for tests. Chemical reagents were prepared which included: cobalt thiocyanate, fast blue B test, Marquis, Mandelin and Zimmerman reagents which were used to examine eight drugs in three different concentrations, each of 10.0 mg/mL, 5.0 mg/mL and 1.0 mg/mL where each reagent was used for a particular drug. The drugs were amphetamine, cannabis, cocaine, 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), codeine, diazepam, heroin, methadone and morphine. Each drug was tested by a specific reagent. The difference in the concentrations gave various results in terms of achieving positive results and the ratio of the clarity of the colour. The amount of the drug on the tongue was between 20 μg and 400 μg. Positive and negative results were obtained in this study. Most of the high concentrations gave positive results; however, the low concentrations gave different results which were between positive, negative and light or very light in colour. In conclusion, there is an explanation of the difference in sensitivity of the effects of the different kinds of reagents in the drug, such as cobalt thiocyanate which was more sensitive at the low concentration of heroin and gave a clear result.

Keywords

Chemical spot test, colorimetric tests, drug test, in vitro tongue, roadside testing

References

  1. Cameron M, Newstead S, Clark B, Thompson L (2022) Evaluation of an increase in roadside drug testing in victoria based on models of the crash effects of random and targeted roadside tests. Journal of Road Safety. 33 (2): 17-32. doi: 10.33492/JRS-D-20-00272
  2. Pirro V, Jarmusch AK, Vincenti M, Cooks RG (2015) Direct drug analysis from oral fluid using medical swab touch spray mass spectrometry. Analytica Chimica Acta. 861: 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2015.01.008
  3. The national highway traffic safety administration standardized field sobriety testing procedures horizontal gaze nystagmus instructions. (n.d.). www.NJ.gov.
  4. Verstraete AG (2005) Oral fluid testing for driving under the influence of drugs: history, recent progress and remaining challenges. Forensic Science International. 150 (2-3): 143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.023
  5. Van der Linden G, Wille SM, Ramírez-Fernandez M, Verstraete A, Samyn N (2015) Roadside drug testing: Comparison of two legal approaches in Belgium. Forensic Science International. 249: 148-155.  doi: 10.1016/ j.forsciint.2015.01.034
  6. Bunn T, Singleton M, Chen I-C (2019) Use of multiple data sources to identify specific drugs and other factors associated with drug and alcohol screening of fatally injured motor vehicle drivers. Accidental; Analysis and Prevention. 122: 287-294.  doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.012
  7. Jenkins AJ, Goldberger BA (2002) On-site drug testing (Jenkins AJ, Goldberger BA, Eds. 2002nd ed.). Humana Press. Harvard, Vancouver. doi: 10.1385/1592592724
  8. Castro A, Lendoiro E, Jiménez-Morigosa C, Cruz A, Lopez-Rivadulla M (2016) Drug detection on Spanish roadsides. Toxicologie Analytique et Clinique. 28 (2): S15. doi: 10.1016/j.toxac.2016.03.022
  9. Kadehjian L (2005) Legal issues in oral fluid testing. Forensic Science International. 150 (2-3): 151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.024
  10. Carlin M (2009) Forensic science: Roadside drug testing. Measurement and Control. 42 (10): 306-309. doi: 10.1177/002029400904201003
  11. Raphael C, Wong HY (2005) Drugs of abuse; body fluid Ttesting. Humana Press Inc. ISBN: 978-1588294357.
  12. Aberl F, VanDine R (2005) Saliva and sweat testing with drugwipe®. In: Drugs of abuse (pp. 161-175). Forensic Science and Medicine. Humana Press. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59259-951-6_10
  13. Flanagan RJ, Taylor AA, Watson ID, Whelpton R (2008) Fundamentals of analytical toxicology: Clinical and forensic. Wiley-Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781119122357.ch1
  14. Drummer OH (2006) Drug testing in oral fluid. The Clinical Biochemist Reviews. 27 (3): 147-159. PMC: 1579288.
  15. Cole MD (2003) The analysis of controlled substances. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-470-86455-5.
  16. O’Neal CL, Crouch DJ, Fatah AA (2000) Validation of twelve chemical spot tests for the detection of drugs of abuse. Forensic Science International. 109 (3): 189-201. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(99)00235-2
  17. Nagy G, Szöllősi I, Szendrei K (2005) Colour tests for precursor chemicals of amphetamine-type substances. Scientific and Technical Notes. SCITEC/20. United Nations, Office on Drugs and Crime. Szeged University, Hungary.
  18. Cooper G, Negrusz A (2013) Clarke’s analytical forensic toxicology (2nd ed.). Pharmaceutical Press. UK. ISBN: 9780857110541.
  19. Bell S (2010) Drugs, poisons and chemistry. Facts on file, Chelsea House. ISBN: 978-0816055104.
  20. Moffat AC, Osselton MD, Widdop B (2011) Clarke’s analysis of drugs and poisons (4th ed.) Pharmaceutical Press. London, Chicago. ISBN: 9780853697114.
  21. Kapp RW (2006) Clarke’s analysis of drugs and poisons, 3rd ed. (Edit. Moffat AC, Osselton MD, Widdop B) pp. 480. Publisher: Pharmaceutical Press: London. 2004. ISBN: 0-853-69473-7.
  22. Samuels E (2000) Color test reagents/kits for preliminary identification of drugs of abuse. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. 1-24. NCJ Number 183258.
  23. Agg KM, Craddock AF, Bos R, Francis PS, Lewis SW, Barnett NW (2006) A rapid test for heroin (3,6-diacetylmorphine) based on two chemiluminescence reactions. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 51 (5): 1080-1084. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00215.x 
  24. Kovar K-A, Laudszun M (1989) Chemistry and reaction mechanisms of rapid tests for drugs of abuse and precursors chemicals. 2-19. UN. Division of Narcotic Drugs. Applied Scientific Research and Technical Information Section. Vienna, Austria.
  25. Alhefeiti MA, Barker J, Shah I (2021) Roadside drug testing approaches. Molecules. 26 (11): 3291. doi: 10.3390/molecules26113291

Submitted date:
10/01/2022

Reviewed date:
10/27/2022

Accepted date:
11/05/2022

Publication date:
11/08/2024

672dc6d5a95395706d373b23 medjpps Articles
Links & Downloads

Mediterr J Pharm Pharm Sci

Share this page
Page Sections