Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/jvb/article/doi/10.1590/S1677-54492008000300017
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Brief Communication

Experiência preliminar com novo filtro de veia cava: resultados de 15 implantes

Preliminary experience with a new vena cava filter: results of 15 implantations

Winston B. Yoshida; Hamilton A. Rollo; Mariângela Giannini; Marcone L. Sobreira; Regina Moura

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492008000300017 J Vasc Bras, vol.7, n3, p.282-288, 2008
PDF
SciELO
Downloads: 0
Views: 1442

Resumo

Este estudo apresenta resultados preliminares obtidos com um novo filtro permanente de veia cava, baseado no desenho de Greenfield, com três hastes prolongadas de um total de seis, para dar estabilidade central ao filtro na luz da veia cava. Neste artigo, relatamos sua avaliação clínica preliminar quanto à aplicabilidade, eficácia e segurança. De agosto de 2004 a dezembro de 2006, 15 filtros foram implantados em nove homens e seis mulheres, com idades variando de 38 a 79 anos (média de 57,8 anos). O acesso foi feito sempre por via transjugular. As indicações foram: trombose venosa proximal, com contra-indicação de anticoagulação em 12 pacientes; complicações hemorrágicas com anticoagulação em dois pacientes; e embolia pulmonar, apesar de anticoagulação adequada, em um paciente. Os filtros foram avaliados quanto à liberação, inclinação, mau posicionamento e perfuração de cava. No seguimento, avaliou-se trombose no local de acesso, tromboembolismo venoso recorrente, migração do filtro e trombose de cava pelo ultra-som. Nenhum paciente recebeu anticoagulantes no seguimento. O filtro foi liberado com sucesso em todos os casos sem mau posicionamento, inclinação, perfuração ou trombose de acesso. Os pacientes foram seguidos entre 3 e 23 meses (média de 11 meses). Nenhum paciente teve recorrência de tromboembolismo venoso. Não houve casos de trombose de veia cava ou migração do filtro. Óbito ocorreu em sete casos, todos relacionados com a moléstia de base. Os resultados preliminares indicam potencial eficácia e segurança do uso do novo filtro no período estudado.

Palavras-chave

Filtro de veia cava, desenho de próteses, embolia pulmonar, embolia pulmonar, trombose venosa

Abstract

This study presents preliminary results obtained from a new permanent filter, based on Greenfield's filter design, with prolongations on three of six struts to stabilize it centrally in the vena caval lumen. The preliminary clinical evaluation of the filter with regard to feasibility, efficacy and safety is reported. From August 2004 to December 2006, 15 vena cava filters were deployed in nine men and six women, who ranged in age from 38 to 79 years (mean, 57.8 years). The approach used was always transjugular. Indications for filter placement were proximal deep venous thrombosis with a contraindication to anticoagulation in 12 patients; hemorrhagic complications with anticoagulation in two patients; and pulmonary embolism, despite adequate anticoagulation in one patient. New vena cava filters were evaluated for releasing, tilting, malpositioning and caval perforation. Follow-up included assessment of access site thrombosis and filter migration, recurrent venous thromboembolism, and caval thrombosis by duplex ultrasound. No patient received anticoagulants in the follow-up. In all patients the filter was successfully released, with no malpositioning, tilting, perforation or access thrombosis. The patients were followed for 3 to 23 months (mean = 11 months). No patient developed recurrent venous thromboembolism. No other patients developed inferior vena cava thrombosis or filter migration. Death occurred in seven patients, all related to baseline illness. This preliminary study suggests good feasibility and safety of the new filter up to the observation period.

Keywords

Vena cava filters, prosthesis design, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary embolism, venous thrombosis

References

Yoshida WB, Lastoria S. Procedimentos de interrupção venosa na trombose venosa profunda e embolia pulmonar. Doenças vasculares periféricas. 2002;2:1473-85.

Greenfield LJ, Michna BA. Twelve-year clinical experience with the Greenfield vena caval filter. Surgery. 1988;104:706-12.

Katsamouris AA, Waltman AC, Delichatsios MA, Athanasoulis CA. Inferior vena cava filters: in vitro comparison of clot trapping and flow dynamics. Radiology. 1988;166:361-6.

Kinney TB. Update on inferior vena cava filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:425-40.

Streiff MB. Vena caval filters: a comprehensive review. Blood. 2000;95:3669-77.

Aswad MA, Sandager GP, Pais SO. Early duplex scan evaluation of four vena caval interruption devices. J Vasc Surg. 1996;24:809-18.

Messmer JM, Greenfield LJ. Greenfield caval filters: long-term radiographic follow-up study. Radiology. 1985;156:613-8.

Abad C, Pomar JL, Morales MA. [Accidental opening of a Greenfield filter at the right atrium]. Angiologia. 1990;42:182-4.

Greenfield LJ, Peyton R, Crute S, Barnes R. Greenfield vena caval filter experience: late results in 156 patients. Arch Surg. 1981;116:1451-6.

Lang W, Schweiger H, Fietkau R, Hofmann-Preiss K. Spontaneous disruption of two Greenfield vena caval filters. Radiology. 1990;174:445-6.

Donaldson MC, Wirthlin LS, Donaldson GA. Thirty-year experience with surgical interruption of the inferior vena cava for prevention of pulmonary embolism. Ann Surg. 1980;191:367-72.

Kupferschmid JP, Dickson CS, Townsend RN, Diamond DL. Small-bowel obstruction from an extruded Greenfield filter strut: an unusual late complication. J Vasc Surg. 1992;16:113-5.

Rogers FB, Shackford SR, Ricci MA, Huber BM, Atkins T. Prophylactic vena cava filter insertion in selected high-risk orthopaedic trauma patients. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11:267-72.

Greenfield LJ, Proctor MC, Cho KJ. Extended evaluation of the titanium Greenfield vena caval filter. J Vasc Surg. 1994;20:458-64.

Rogers FB, Strindberg G, Shackford SR. Five-year follow-up of prophylactic vena cava filters in high-risk trauma patients. Arch Surg. 1998;133:406-11.

Kinney TB, Rose SC, Weingarten KE, Valji K, Oglevie SB, Roberts AC. IVC filter tilt and asymmetry: comparison of the over-the-wire stainless-steel and titanium Greenfield IVC filters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8:1029-37.

Yoshida WB, Sequera J, De Abreu Maffei FH. Long-term histopathologic evaluation of inferior vena cava after modified Greenfield filter implantation: Experimental study in sheep. Int Angiol. 2004;23:170-6.

Dorfman GS. Percutaneous inferior vena caval filters. Radiology. 1990;174(3):987-92.

Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study. Circulation. 2005;112:416-22.

Hingorani A, Ascher E, Markevich N. Risk factors for mortality in patients with upper extremity and internal jugular deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41:476-8.

Rectenwald JE, Greenfield LJ, Henke PK, Proctor MC, Wakefileld TW. Vena caval interruption procedures. Vascular surgery. 2005;2:2198-216.

Yoshida WB, Rollo HA, Lastoria S, Maffei FHA. Interrupção venosa como tratamento de exceção na trombose venosa profunda e embolia pulmonar. Cir Vasc Angiol. 1987;3:23-9.

Streiff MB. Vena caval filters: a review for intensive care specialists. J Intensive Care Med. 2003;18:59-79.

Baglin TP, Brush J, Streiff M. Guidelines on use of vena cava filters. Br J Haematol. 2006;134:590-5.

Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F. A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis: Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:409-15.

Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)"> Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)">
5ddd660c0e88257a3e1da3e9 jvb Articles
Links & Downloads
1677-7301 (Electronic)
J Vasc Bras ©2024 All rights reserved.

J Vasc Bras

Share this page
Page Sections