Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/jvb/article/doi/10.1590/1677-5449.202501622
Jornal Vascular Brasileiro
Original Article

Subclinical varicose vein recurrence: modern approaches in aesthetic phlebology

Recorrência varicosa subclínica: abordagens modernas em flebologia estética

Serhii Shchukin

Downloads: 0
Views: 5

Abstract

Background: Recurrence after varicose vein treatment is usually framed as varices on a previously treated limb, potentially overlooking patients with cosmetic C0–C1 concerns who still experience duplex Doppler ultrasound-verified reflux.

Objectives: To characterize patterns of subclinical (C1-dominant) recurrences in duplex Doppler ultrasound and evaluate a 2-stage pathway prioritizing hemodynamic correction before aesthetic care.

Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study (2018-2024) was conducted with patients from a vascular clinic. The participants were 354 women with unaesthetic telangiectasias/reticular veins without C2 varices on the index limb after prior varicose treatment. The interventions (exposures) were: (Stage 1) ultrasound-guided 3% polidocanol foam for segments ≤ 3 mm and endovenous laser ablation ≥ 3 mm (anterior accessory saphenous vein/ greater saphenous vein /small saphenous vein/perforators); (Stage 2) 2 sessions of cryo-laser and cryo-sclerotherapy at a 1-month interval, guided by near-infrared augmented-reality. The main outcomes were duplex-verified occlusion of Stage-1 targets at 1 month and aesthetic outcome at 6 months (rated on a 5-point Likert scale). Safety measures included symptomatic venous thromboembolism and minor adverse effects.

Results: At 1 month, all targets were occluded and no symptomatic venous thromboembolisms had occurred. Mapping frequently showed multilevel reflux (anterior accessory saphenous vein, angiomatosis in the vein stump or strip tract, junctional complexes, perforators), with 78% of patients having ≥ 2 sources. At 6 months, good/excellent aesthetic outcomes (Likert scale score 4-5) were achieved in 83.1% of patients (mean score: 4.22). The scoring distribution was: 1 point: 7 (2.0%); 2 points: 11 (3.1%); 3 points: 42 (11.9%); 4 points: 131 (37.0%); and 5 points: 163 (46.0%). Minor events were limited to transient pigmentation/matting.

Conclusions: Subclinical recurrence is chiefly hemodynamic. An etiology-first strategy using duplex Doppler ultrasound followed by cryo-laser and cryo-sclerotherapy yields high early satisfaction and could mitigate early cosmetic recurrence.

Supplementary material

Keywords

varicose veins; recurrence; telangiectasis; sclerotherapy; laser therapy; ultrasonography, Doppler; endovascular procedures; augmented reality; CLaCS (cryo-laser and cryo-sclerotherapy)

Resumo

Contexto: Recorrência pós-tratamento de varizes é geralmente classificada como C2 em membro previamente tratado, potencialmente negligenciando pacientes com queixas estéticas C0–C1 que ainda apresentam refluxo verificado por dúplex.

Objetivos: Caracterizar padrões dúplex de recorrências subclínicas (C1-dominante) e avaliar uma abordagem de duas etapas, priorizando correção hemodinâmica pré-tratamento estético.

Métodos: Coorte retrospectiva unicêntrica em clínica vascular ambulatorial (2018–2024). Participantes: 354 mulheres com telangiectasias/veias reticulares inestéticas sem varizes C2 no membro inicialmente tratado pós-tratamento venoso prévio. Etapa 1: espuma de polidocanol 3% guiada por ultrassom para segmentos ≤3 mm; EVLA para ≥3 mm (VSAA/VSM/VSP/perfurantes). Etapa 2: CLaCS (criolaser + crioescleroterapia) em duas sessões com intervalo de um mês, guiado por realidade aumentada em infravermelho próximo. Principais desfechos e medidas. Primários: oclusão por dúplex dos alvos da Etapa 1 em 1 mês e desfecho estético em 6 meses (Likert, 5 pontos). Segurança: TEV sintomático e efeitos adversos menores.

Resultados: Em 1 mês, todas as veias-alvo estavam ocluídas; nenhum TEV sintomático ocorreu. Mapeamento mostrou frequentemente refluxo multinível (VSAA, angiomatose de coto/faixa, complexos juncionais, perfurantes); 78% tinham ≥2 fontes. Em 6 meses, resultados bons/excelentes (4–5) em 83,1% (média 4,22). A distribuição das pontuações Likert foi: 1 ponto: 7 (2,0%); 2 pontos: 11 (3,1%); 3 pontos: 42 (11,9%); 4 pontos: 131 (37,0%); 5 pontos: 163 (46,0%). Eventos menores foram limitados à pigmentação/matting transitória.

Conclusões: Recorrência subclínica é predominantemente hemodinâmica. Estratégia guiada por dúplex, priorizando etiologia, seguida por CLaCS, produz alta satisfação precoce e pode mitigar a recidiva estética precoce.

Material suplementar

Palavras-chave

varizes; recorrência; telangiectasia; escleroterapia; terapia a laser; ultrassonografia doppler; procedimentos endovasculares; realidade aumentada; CLaCS (criolaser e crioescleroterapia)

References

1 De Maeseneer MG, Kakkos SK, Aherne T, et al, and the Esvs Guidelines Committee. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic venous disease of the lower limbs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022;63(2):184-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.12.024. PMid:35027279.

2 O’Donnell TF, Balk EM, Dermody M, Tangney E, Iafrati MD. Recurrence of varicose veins after endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein in randomized trials. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2016;4(1):97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.11.004. PMid:26946904.

3 Gloviczki P, Lawrence PF, Wasan SM, et al. The 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery, American Venous Forum, and American Vein and Lymphatic Society clinical practice guidelines for the management of varicose veins of the lower extremities. Part II. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12(1):101670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.011. PMid:37652254.

4 Baccellieri D, Ardita V, Pannone A, et al. Factors influencing recurrent varicose vein formation after radiofrequency thermal ablation for truncal reflux performed in two high‑volume venous centers. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12(2):101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.014. PMid:37703941.

5 Perrin MR, Guex JJ, Ruckley CV, et al. and the REVAS Group. Recurrent varices after surgery (REVAS): a consensus document. Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;8(4):233-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/096721090000800402. PMid:10950599.

6 Kern P. Pathophysiology of telangiectasias of the lower legs and its therapeutic implication: a systematic review. Phlebology. 2018;33(4):225-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355518756480. PMid:29388868.

7 Nasser MM, Ghoneim BM, Eldaly W, Elmahdy H. A comparative study between cryo‑laser cryo‑sclerotherapy and sclerotherapy in the treatment of telangiectasia and reticular veins: a randomized controlled trial. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024;12(4):101874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101874. PMid:38522666.

8 Nakano LC, Cacione DG, Baptista‑Silva JC, Flumignan RL. Treatment for telangiectasias and reticular veins. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;10(10):CD012723. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012723.pub2. PMid:34637138.

9 Pavei P, Spreafico G, Bernardi E, Giraldi E, Ferrini M. Favourable long‑term results of endovenous laser ablation of great and small saphenous vein incompetence with a 1470‑nm laser and radial fibre. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021;9(2):352-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.06.015. PMid:32599308.

10 Fonseca MM, Mocelin FJ, Poltronieri LR, Guimaraes Filho JL. Treatment of varicose veins using the cryo‑laser after foam technique. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2024;10(4):101549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101549. PMid:39027725.

11 Miyake K, Grill MH, Feitoza HSN. Case report: Novel leg vein treatment CLaCS guided by augmented reality 11‑year follow‑up. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023;22(Suppl. 2):16-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.15832. PMid:37318788.

12 Miot HA. Sample size in clinical and experimental trials. J Vasc Bras. 2011;10(4):275-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492011000400001.

13 von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, and the STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007;335(7624):806-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. PMid:17947786.

14 Mariani F, Carbone L, Sozio G, et al. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy of the saphenous trunks is associated with a low 5-year recurrence rate and improved quality of life in patients with chronic venous disease: a multicenter study. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2025;13(4):102212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2025.102212. PMid:39983866.

15 Müller L, Alm J. Feasibility and technique of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of recurrent varicose veins deriving from the sapheno‑femoral junction—a case series of 35 consecutive procedures. PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0235656. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235656. PMid:32628724.

16 Müller L, Debus ES, Karsai S, Alm J. Technique and early results of endovenous laser ablation in morphologically complex varicose vein recurrence after small saphenous vein surgery. PLoS One. 2024;19(10):e0310182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310182. PMid:39392807.

17 Cong L, Sun J, Wang L, et al. Hybrid endovenous laser ablation reduces the recurrence of varicose veins below the knee compared with radiofrequency ablation: a real‑world study. Arch Med Sci. 2023;19(6):1739-46. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms/163449. PMid:38058714.

18 Jun J, Yoon M, Jung H, Jun H. Feasibility and safety of flush endovenous thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein with consecutive foam sclerotherapy of saphenofemoral junction tributaries: a single‑center experience. J Clin Med. 2024;13(23):7148. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237148. PMid:39685607.

19 Bertanha M, Yoshida WB, Bueno de Camargo PA, et al. Polidocanol plus glucose versus glucose alone for the treatment of telangiectasias: triple-blind, randomised controlled trial (PG3T). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021;61(1):128-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.07.007. PMid:32778489.

20 Miyake RK. Cryo-laser and cryo-sclerotherapy guided by augmented reality: report of 140 cases. Phlebologie. 2014;43(5):257-61. https://doi.org/10.12687/phleb2218-5-2014.
 


Submitted date:
09/04/2025

Accepted date:
12/17/2025

Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)"> Sociedade Brasileira de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular (SBACV)">
69bc473da95395031324cea4 jvb Articles
Links & Downloads

J Vasc Bras

Share this page
Page Sections