Instrumento de avaliação de habilidades cirúrgicas relacionadas à realização de uma anastomose vascular
Instrument for assessing surgical skills related to performing a vascular anastomosis
Gabriela de Oliveira Buril; Joseph Monteiro de Carvalho; Vânia dos Santos Nunes-Nogueira
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Technical skill is one of the most important components of surgical competence and must be thoroughly learned and developed over the course of surgical residency. However, there are still few instruments for directly appraising and quantifying surgical skill and the majority of centers rely on the subjective observations of tutors. The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review on the subject of instruments for appraisal of surgical skills available for assessment of vascular anastomosis performed by vascular surgery residents. A review was conducted using the following search terms: “educational measurement”, “vascular surgery”, and “internship and residency”. The initial search results comprised 616 articles. After application of the eligibility criteria, just four studies were included in the review, only one of which was conducted in Brazil. Three of the studies used Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) to assess residents. However, all used separate and different supplementary checklists for evaluation of specific skills related to anastomoses. Appropriate appraisal and precise feedback during residency training are an extremely important part of residents’ training. Systematic and objective feedback enables errors to be corrected and skills to be polished. Since there is no instrument for assessment of the surgical skills needed to perform anastomosis, after completion of the review a rating instrument was proposed focused on this important skill that vascular surgery residents must acquire. The instrument comprises a compilation of the instruments reviewed and includes a proposed checklist for use in real-world settings.
Keywords
Referências
1 Wilasrusmee C, Phromsopha N, Lertsitichai P, Kittur DS. A new vascular anastomosis model: relation between outcome and experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(2):208-13.
2 Torres IO, Becari A, Escudeiro GPM, et al. The use of a low-fidelity simulator to improve vascular anastomosis skills of residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Vasc Surg. 2022;83:87-96.
3 Duran CA, Shames M, Bismuth J, Lee JT. Validated assessment tool paves the way for standardized evaluation of trainees on anastomotic models. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28(1):115-21.
4 Fann JI, Caffarelli AD, Georgette G, et al. Improvement in coronary anastomosis with cardiac surgery simulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(6):1486-91.
5 Jogerst KM, Eurboonyanun C, Park Y, et al. Implementation of the ACS/ APDS Resident Skills Curriculum reveals a need for rater training: An analysis using generalizability theory. Am J Surg. 2021;222(3):541-8.
6 Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick H, et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84(2):273-8. PMid:9052454.
7 Campos MEC, Oliveira MMR, Assis LB, Reis AB, Gonçalves FB. Validation of the objective structured assessment of technical skill in Brasil. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2020;66(3):328-33.
8 Peter MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil H. Scoping Rewiews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual For Evidence Synthesis. Adelaide: JBI; 2020. p. 406-451.
9 Wilasrusmee C, Lertsithichai P, Kittur DS. Vascular anastomosis model: relation between competency in a laboratory-based model and surgical competency. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;34(4):405-10.
10 Shah D, Haisch CE, Noland SL. Case reporting, competence, and confidence: a discrepancy in the numbers. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(2):304-12.
11 Tavlasoglu M, Durukan AB, Gurbuz HA, Jahollari A, Guler A. Skill acquisition process in vascular anastomosis procedures: a simulation-based study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(5):812-8.
12 Fann JI, Caffarelli AD, Georgette G, et al. Improvement in coronary anastomosis with cardiac surgery simulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(6):1486-91.
13 Doyle JD, Webber EM, Sidhu RS. A universal global rating scale for the evaluation of technical skills in the operating room. Am J Surg. 2007;193(5):551-5, discussion 555.
14 Galvão TF, Pereira MG. Revisões sistemáticas e outros tipos de síntese: comentários à séria metodológica publicada na Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2022;31(3):e2022422.
15 Campbell F, Tricco AC, Munn Z, et al. Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, anda evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different – the “Big Picture” review family. Syst Rev. 2023;12(1):45.
16 Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMAScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73.
Submetido em:
25/03/2024
Aceito em:
08/09/2024
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email