Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
https://app.periodikos.com.br/journal/alb/article/doi/10.1590/S2179-975X13017
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
Original Article

Relative condition factor: Le Cren's legacy for fisheries science

Fator de condição relativo: o legado de Le Cren para a ciência pesqueira

Éder André Gubiani; Renata Ruaro; Vinícius Ricardo Ribeiro; Úrsula Morgana Gomes de Santa Fé

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2179-975X13017 Acta Limnol. Bras. (Online), vol.32, e3, 2020
PDF
Downloads: 0
Views: 1387

Abstract

Abstract: : Aim: In this paper we present a scientometric analysis aimed at to assess and quantify the contribution of Le Cren’s condition factor and the main ideas advanced by ‘Le Cren, 1951’ to studies on the health of individuals or populations in aquatic environments. Specifically, we addressed the following questions: (i) what are the temporal and spatial citation trends of ‘Le Cren, 1951’?; (ii) Which journals cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ most frequently?; (iii) In which types of aquatic environments and organisms have Le Cren’s condition factor been most commonly applied?; (iv) Which of the main applications addressed in ‘Le Cren, 1951’ have been most frequently used by fisheries scientists?; (v) Which of the methods (i.e., Quételet’s index or body mass index, Fulton’s condition factor, Le Cren’s condition factor, relative weight, residual index and scaled mass index) used to estimate condition factor identified in the papers that cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ have been most frequently used? In addition, the main criticisms of the use of the relative condition factor are discussed.

Methods: We carried out a scientometric analysis on the papers published from 1951 to December 2015 that cited Le Cren’s article. The papers were obtained from the Thomson Reuters database (ISI Web of Knowledge, apps.isiknowledge.com) in May 2016.

Results: In total, 1128 papers were assessed. The number of citations increased significantly over time. Most citations occurred in two journals (Journal of Fish Biology and Journal of Applied Ichthyology). Most of papers were carried out in marine environments. In addition, we show that Le Cren's paper has been cited mainly in articles that estimate the condition factor or the weight-length relationship of populations. Finally, we emphasize that the relative condition factor proposed by Le Cren in 1951 is still the main method used to estimate the body condition of an individual or population.

Conclusions: Le Cren's significant contribution to animal well-being is undeniable, and we emphasize that among the methods identified in the papers that cited ‘Le Cren, 1951’ that estimated body condition, the relative condition factor proposed by Le Cren in 1951 is still the most commonly used method.

Keywords

Eric D. Le Cren, body condition, condition indices, length-weight relationship, aquatic ecosystems

Resumo

Resumo: : Objetivo: Assim, o objetivo deste trabalho foi realizar uma análise cienciométrica para avaliar e quantificar a contribuição do fator de condição relativo e das principais ideias propostas por ‘Le Cren, 1951’ em estudos sobre a saúde de um indivíduo ou população em ambientes aquáticos. Especificamente, respondemos as seguintes questões (i) quais foram as tendências espaciais e temporais nas citações de ‘Le Cren, 1951’? (ii) quais revistas citaram ‘Le Cren, 1951’ mais frequentemente? (iii) em quais tipos de ambientes aquáticos e organismos o fator de condição relativo tem sido mais frequentemente aplicado? (iv) quais as principais aplicações abordadas em ‘Le Cren, 1951’ foram mais frequentemente utilizadas por cientistas pesqueiros? E (v) quais métodos (i.e. índice de Quételet ou índice de massa corpórea, fator de condição de Fulton, fator de condição de Le Cren, peso relativo, índice residual ou índice de massa escalonado) usados para estimar o fator de condição, identificados nos trabalhos que citaram ‘Le Cren, 1951’, têm sido mais frequentemente usados? Além disso, as principais críticas ao uso do fator de condição relativo são discutidas

Métodos: Em maio de 2016, nós realizamos uma análise cienciométrica dos trabalhos publicados de 1951 a dezembro de 2015 que citaram o artigo de Le Cren utilizando a base de dados da Thomson Reuters (ISI Web of Knowledge, apps.isiknowledge.com).

Resultados: Ao todo 1128 artigos foram contabilizados. O número de citações aumentou significativamente ao longo do tempo. A maioria das citações ocorreu em dois periódicos (Journal of Fish Biology and Journal of Applied Ichthyology). A maior parte dos artigos foi realizada em ambientes aquáticos. O artigo de Le Cren tem sido citado principalmente em artigos que estimaram o fator de condição ou a relação peso-comprimento de uma população. Além disso, nós enfatizamos que o fator de condição relativo proposto por Le Cren em 1951 ainda é o principal método utilizado para estimar a condição corporal de um indivíduo ou população.

Conclusões: Assim, a contribuição significativa de Le Cren para o estudo da saúde animal é inegável e nós enfatizamos que entre os métodos, identificados nos artigos que citaram ‘Le Cren, 1951’, para estimar a condição corporal, o fator de condição relativo proposto por Le Cren ainda é o mais utilizado.
 

Palavras-chave

Eric D. Le Cren, condição corporal, índices de condição, relação peso-comprimento, ecossistemas aquáticos

Referências

Bachman, G. and Widemo, F. Relationships between body composition, body size and alternative reproductive tactics in a lekking sandpiper, the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax). Functional Ecology, 1999, 13(3), 411-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00323.x.

Barone, R.S.C., Lorenz, E.K., Sonoda, D.Y. and Cyrino, J.E.P. Fish and fishery products trade in Brazil, 2005 to 2015: A review of available data and trends. Scientia Agrícola, 2017, 74(5), 417-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0300.

Bolger, T. and Connolly, P.L. The selection of suitable indices for the measurement and analysis of fish condition. Journal of Fish Biology, 1989, 34(2), 171-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1989.tb03300.x.

Chang, B.D. and Navas, W. Seasonal variation in growth, condition and gonads of Dormitator latifrons (Richardson) in the Chone River basin, Ecuador. Journal of Fish Biology, 1984, 24(6), 637-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1984.tb04834.x.

Cone, R.S. The need to reconsider the use of condition indices in fishery science. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 1989, 118(5), 510-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1989)118<0511:TNTRTU>2.3.CO;2.

De Meis, L., Arruda, A.P. and Guimarães, J. The impact of science in Brazil. International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology life, 2007, 59(4-5), 227-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15216540701258140

Delahunty, G. and De Vlaming, V.L. Seasonal relationships of ovary weight, liver weight and fat stores with body weight in the goldfish, Carassius auratus (L.). Journal of Fish Biology, 1980, 16(1), 5-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1980.tb03683.x.

Dobson, F.S. and Michener, G.R. Maternal traits and reproduction in Richardson’s ground squirrels. Ecology, 1995, 76(3), 851-862. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1939350.

Froese, R. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: History, meta-analysis and recommendations. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 2006, 22(4), 241-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x.

Froese, R., Tsikliras, A.C. and Stergiou, K.I. Editorial note on weight-length relations of fishes. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria, 2011, 41(4), 261-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.3750/AIP2011.41.4.01.

Fulton, T.W. The rate of growth of fishes. Twenty-second Annual Report, Part III. Edinburgh: Fisheries Board of Scotland, 1904, pp. 141-241.

Heidinger, R.C. and Crawford, S.D. Effect of temperature and feeding rate on the liver-somatic index of the largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1977, 34(5), 633-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/f77-099.

Hile, R. Age and growth of the cisco, Leucichthys artedi (LeSuer), in the lakes of the northeastern highlands, Wisconsin. Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Fisheries, 1936, 48, 211-317.

Jacobs, S.R., Elliott, K., Guigueno, M.F., Gaston, A.J., Redman, P., Speakman, J.R. and Weber, J.M. Determining seabird body condition using nonlethal measures. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 2012, 85(1), 85-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/663832. PMid:22237292.

Jakob, E.M., Marshall, S.D. and Uetz, G.W. Estimating fitness: a comparison of body condition indices. Oikos, 1996, 77(1), 61-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3545585.

Johnson, M.D. Measuring habitat quality: A review. The Condor, 2007, 109(3), 489-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/condor/109.3.489.

Keys, A., Fidanza, F., Karvonen, M.J., Kimura, N. and Taylor, H.L. Indices of relative weight and adiposity. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 1972, 25(6), 329-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(72)90027-6. PMid:4650929.

Labocha, M.K. and Hayes, J.P. Morphometric indices of body condition in birds: a review. Journal of Ornithology, 2012, 153(1), 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0706-1.

Labocha, M.K., Schutz, H. and Hayes, J.P. Which body condition index is best? Oikos, 2014, 123(1), 111-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00755.x.

Le Cren, E.D. The length–weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology, 1951, 20(2), 201-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1540.

Lewinsohn, T.M. and Prado, P.I. How many species are there in Brazil? Conservation Biology, 2005, 19(3), 619-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00680.x.

Lloret, J. and Ratz, H.J. Condition of cod (Gadus morhua) off Greenland during 1982–1998. Fisheries Research, 2000, 48(1), 79-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-7836(00)00111-9.

Lloret, J., de Sola, L.G., Souplet, A. and Galzin, R. Effects of large-scale habitat variability on condition of demersal exploited fish in the north-western Mediterranean. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 2002, 59(6), 1215-1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmsc.2002.1294.

Lowe-McConnell, R. Eric David Le Cren 1922-2011 (Freshwater Biological Association). Journal of Fish Biology, 2011, 79(7), 1681-1684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03168.x.

Nikolsky, G.V. The ecology of fishes. New York: Academic Press, 1963, 352 p.

Peig, J. and Green, A.J. New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos, 2009, 118(12), 1883-1891. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17643.x.

Peig, J. and Green, A.J. The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Functional Ecology, 2010, 24(6), 1323-1332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01751.x.

Pelicice, F.M., Azevedo-Santos, V.M., Vitule, J.R.S., Orsi, M.L., Lima Junior, D.P., Magalhães, A.L.B. and Pompeu, P.S., PETRERE JUNIOR, M. and AGOSTINHO, A.A. Neotropical freshwater fishes imperilled by unsustainable policies. Fish and Fisheries, 2017, 18(6), 1119-1133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/faf.12228.

Quételet, A. Recherches sur le poids de l’homme aux different âges. vol. 7. Bruxelles: Nouveaux Memoire de l’Academie Royale des Sciences et Belles-Lettres de Bruxelles, 1832.

Regalado, A. Brazilian Science: riding a gusher. Science, 2010, 330(6009), 1306-1312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.330.6009.1306. PMid:21127226.

Reis, R.E., Albert, J.S., Di Dario, F., Mincarone, M.M., Petry, P. and Rocha, L.A. Fish biodiversity and conservation in South America. Journal of Fish Biology, 2016, 89(1), 12-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jfb.13016. PMid:27312713.

Reis, R.E., Kullander, O. and Ferraris Junior, C.J. Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 2003, 742 p.

Ricker, W.E. Computation and interpretation of the biological statistics of fish populations. Bulletin - Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1975, 191, 1-382.

Schäfer, R.B., Cooke, S.J., Arlinghaus, R., Bonada, N., Brischoux, F., Casper, A.F., Catford, J.A. and Rolland, V. Perspectives from early career researchers on the publication process in ecology - a response to Statzner and Resh (2010). Freshwater Biology, 2011, 56(11), 2405-2412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02673.x.

Schulte-Hostedde, A.I., Millar, J.S. and Hickling, G.J. Evaluating body condition in small mammals. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2001, 79(6), 1021-1029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z01-073.

Schulte-Hostedde, A.I., Zinner, B., Millar, J.S. and Hickling, G.J. Restitution of mass-size residuals: validating body condition indices. Ecology, 2005, 86(1), 155-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/04-0232.

Shine, R., Lemaster, M.P., Moore, I.T., Olsson, M.M. and Mason, R.T. Bumpus in the snake den: effects of sex, size, and body condition on mortality of red-sided garter snakes. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 2001, 55(3), 598-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0598:BITSDE]2.0.CO;2. PMid:11327166.

Souza, E.P.S., Cabrera, E.M.S. and Braile, D.M. The article of the future. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular; Orgao Oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, 2010, 25(2), 141-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76382010000200003. PMid:20802903.

Toussaint, A., Charpin, N., Brosse, S. and Villéger, S. Global functional diversity of freshwater fish is concentrated in the Neotropics while functional vulnerability is widespread. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1), 22125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep22125. PMid:26980070.

Viblanc, V.A., Bize, P., Criscuolo, F., Le Vaillant, M., Saraux, C., Pardonnet, S., Gineste, B., Kauffmann, M., Prud’homme, O., Handrich, Y., Massemin, S., Groscolas, R. and Robin, J.P. Body girth as an alternative to body mass for establishing condition indexes in field studies: a validation in the king penguin. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, 2012, 85(5), 533-542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/667540. PMid:22902382.

Wege, G.J. and Anderson, R.O. Relative weight (Wr): a new index of condition of largemouth bass. In: G.D. NOVINGER and J.D. DILLARD, eds. New approaches to the management of small impoundments. Bethesda, Maryland: North Central Division, American Fisheries Society Special Publication, 1978, pp. 79-91.
 

Submetido em:
07/12/2017

Aceito em:
28/11/2019

Publicado em:
03/08/2020

5f285b8e0e88258d010e4939 alb Articles
Links & Downloads
2179-975X (Eletrônico)
Acta Limnol. Bras. (Online) ©2024 Todos os direitos reservados.

Acta Limnol. Bras. (Online)

Share this page
Page Sections